Logo
ISSUE #31.23 • MUSIC • Q&A

Greil Marcus SOUNDS OFF


The pop-culture patriarch talks about music snobs, ringtones and why bomb threats were important to the making of Bob Dylan.

Share: | Permalink
Email | Print | Rate It! | 0 comments
Recently in "Music"

November 18th, 2009
Clublist Spotlight • A Better ’Stache0 comments

November 18th, 2009
CD Reviews: MarchFourth Marching Band, Curious Hands0 comments

November 18th, 2009
Meth Teeth Sunday, Nov. 22 | Making the best of this bummer called life.0 comments

November 18th, 2009
Primer: Girls0 comments

November 18th, 2009
Sparkle And Fade | The rise and fall of Everclear and The Cherry Poppin’ Daddies.0 comments

November 11th, 2009
CD Review: The Dimes | The King Can Drink the Harbor Dry (Pet Marmoset Records)2 comments

November 11th, 2009
Finn Riggins, Friday, Nov. 13 | Finn Riggins ditched the big yellow bus, but it’s not about to ditch its home state of Idaho.0 comments

November 11th, 2009
Kelly Blair Bauman Monday, Nov. 16 | Kelly Blair Bauman sees Portland burning, and he’s got the midlife-crisis folk to soundtrack the destruction.0 comments

November 11th, 2009
Primer: Saul Williams0 comments

November 11th, 2009
Living The Dream | Portland’s Dirtnap Records just stumbled into its 10th year.2 comments


Greil Marcus
BY MARK BAUMGARTEN | mbaumgarten at wweek dot com

[April 13th, 2005] The publication of Greil Marcus' Like a Rolling Stone: Bob Dylan at the Crossroads is a landmark for the heady music critic. The book marks the 40th anniversary of "Like a Rolling Stone," a 6-minute, 6-second barnburner of a record that Dylan somehow got on the radio. The seminal song also launched Marcus' career as a music journalist and his first scribblings on Dylan, two events that coincided in a review of "Like a Rolling Stone" published in the fall of 1965 in his college paper, Berkeley's The Daily Californian.

The 225-page book is a thorough dissection of Dylan's masterpiece. "It was an event," Marcus writes, "not the event of its commercial release, or even the event of when it reached the public at large, but the event generated by the performance itself." WW spoke to Marcus about the major event, and those other minor ones.

WW: You say the recording of "Like a Rolling Stone" was so much due to chance. What would Dylan's legacy have been had that song never happened?

I think he would be much more of an art figure than a cultural presence, or even a historical actor. In other words, he would be someone who was appreciated, someone who was loved, reviled or dismissed. But it would be so much more on the basis of the quality of his art as opposed to the fact that this is someone you couldn't ignore, someone you had to have an opinion about, someone you had to take into account. I think it's this song that doesn't so much put him on the map as it makes him part of it.

Did the song divide listeners when it was released?

I don't know if I would say that is true. It was a pop song-a pop hit-and, I mean, I lived in California and the whole "Is Bob Dylan betraying folk music?" nonsense didn't make it all the way to California. My friends and I were baffled at the supposed controversy back East in the summer of 1965. I think the people who were still clinging to the notion that folk music was pure and the radio was corrupt just kind of dropped away, or their voices were no longer heard.

When you talk about the folk scene rejecting Dylan, isn't there something larger going on that's a part of being a music fan? Are those rejections meaningless because they represent such a small group of fans?

I'm sure there was an element of that in it, that "Our Bobby is now out there in the world." But I think whether this whole incident is trivial or not-and I think historically it's very trivial-it isn't trivial in the sense that the controversy, the rancor, the rage, the condemnation that Dylan faced every night went into his music and made it stronger. He was fighting a battle, and he was fighting it with his music. So I think to the degree that people were calling him every obscene and horrible name in the book, phoned in bomb threats to his concert halls, threatened to boycott him, stood up and walked out, threw things at the stage, that brought the combativeness and sense of high stakes-that's already there in "Like a Rolling Stone."













icon Story continues below

advertisement

advertisement

You write about the politics of the charts in 1965 extensively in the book. Do you follow the charts closely now? Do you feel like there is as much at stake as there was back then?

In 1965, not only was there the sense that the best music being made was showing up in the Top 40-that it wasn't a restrictive format-in fact it was a format that was really in flux. Radio stations didn't know what people wanted to hear-didn't know the most efficient way to sell their commercials-so they were very open to trying almost anything, and that meant a lot of left-field stuff really hit. But the other factor is that stations or markets in other parts of the country were not the same. A record could be No. 1 in Detroit and not chart at all in San Francisco or New York. There was a real sense that what was going on was on the radio, and that hasn't been true for a long, long time, because of much more demographically targeted radio formats and because what's a hit here is likely gonna be a hit there or vice versa. And now there are much more narrow playlists in every format.

So what is the barometer now?

It could be true that the barometer is really ringtones. That may be where the taste of the nation is being exercised most intensely and where the whole notion of young people identifying with this or that performer is most direct. Who's on your cell phone this week? God knows that's where a lot of the money is being made, in downloading ringtones.

What's the most significant thing to happen in popular music in the past year?

I think "Hey Ya" still being on the radio. The notion that a song can continue to find its way from station to station, format to format, person to person and not go away-I think that's just wonderful.

Greil Marcus will speak at 7:30 pm Monday, April 18, at the Pacific Northwest College of Art, 1241 NW Johnson St., 227-2583. $10, $7 senior and college, $5 youth. All ages.

 

Rate This Story
Be the first to rate this story.

 
read all 0 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “Greil Marcus SOUNDS OFF”

 
 
 





Ad

Ad

Ad

Sponsored Links: WW Personals
Musician's Market
Snowboard Jackets
Legal Tips
Camping Gear


Recently in Willamette Week
December 31st 1969Washington State | The Canada of Oregon has it all—a Stonehenge replica, a longboarder's concrete wet dream and dark, damp underground lava caves. Vive les rocks.
December 31st 1969Oregon's Outer Edges | Crater Lake. Hell's Canyon. Wallowa and Steens mountain ranges. Hell, yeah.
December 31st 1969Central Oregon/High Desert | No rain, plenty of snow, obsidian flows and great local beer. The folks from the real eastside know how to unbend outside.
December 31st 1969Great Cascades/Columbia Gorge | With plenty of room to roam—and hot springs for your weary feet—it's the place to ramble and relax for the weekend.
December 31st 1969Willamette Valley | Monks, tracks, tubing and wine make the fertile strip a virile place to play.
December 31st 1969Stumptown | Tons of public parks, an extinct volcano and nude beach volleyball to keep you jolly. Get out and collect those merit badges, without leaving the city.
December 31st 1969The Coast | The beaches are public. You own them. Go play—hike in the old-growth forests.
December 31st 1969Cycle Tour 101: Your on-bike guide to Highway 101 | To ride the greatest bike route in Oregon, you need to get out of Portland.
December 31st 1969Doggin' It | What happens when a Portland running club jogs with pooches from the pound?
December 31st 1969Over the Edge | Sam Drevo will paddle yr ass.