Empty Gazes
Searching for enigma, Jock Sturges finds only boredom.
December 31st, 2008
Visual Arts Best of 2008 | Bright spots in a challenging year for the arts.1 comment
November 26th, 2008
Dark Corners: Dan Gilsdorf/Horia Boboia | Two installations explore the spooky corridors of the creative mind.0 comments
November 12th, 2008
Q & A • Jeanine Jablonski | Economy be damned, Fourteen30’s got bold ideas for our art scene.4 comments
October 29th, 2008
The Nines | Don’t just look at local art—sleep with it.1 comment
October 22nd, 2008
Brenden Clenaghen at Pulliam Deffenbaugh | Portrait of an artist—in search of a new style.0 comments
October 15th, 2008
Juri Morioka At Butters | The New York painter transcends the prosaic.2 comments
October 1st, 2008
Bruce Conkle at Rocksbox0 comments
October 1st, 2008
Gate Closing | Why is Jennifer Gately leaving the Portland Art Museum?3 comments
September 17th, 2008
Volume at Worksound | Portland artists explore space in curator-about-town Jeff Jahn’s latest show. 0 comments
September 3rd, 2008
Ed Ruscha at the Portland Art Museum | An edgy elegy to youth from a pop art original.0 comments
![]() Fanny (D107) by Jock Sturges at Butters Gallery. |
[May 24th, 2006] Generally, a portraitist is only as good as his subjects. Up until now, this has worked in Jock Sturges' favor, as he's photographed nudist families in Northern California and the South of France, making a name for himself as a poet of the pubescent pastorale, his nymphets shimmering with down and dew. For all the notoriety of his subject matter, Sturges has never trivialized his models' T&A; their nudity is a vehicle toward simplicity, drawing our eyes not to naughty bits, but to faces, eyes and what presumably lies behind them. Sturges has always had a knack for capturing the implacable gaze: an open expression that suggests an old soul reawakening inside a young mind. Whether such precocious wisdom actually exists behind these tawny, freckle-faced facades is immaterial; the appearance of wisdom within the frame is sufficient. Which brings us to Sturges' latest outing at Butters, in which the contemporary zeitgeist seems finally to have caught up with the artist and turned his romantic visions from honeyed to hackneyed.
The photographer tries, oh how he tries, to plumb his subjects' depths, only to run aground in shallows; searching for a Mona Lisa smile, he finds only a Barbie doll's empty stare. The tweener and Gen Y girls populating these pictures harbor no secrets in their eyes, only boredom. They are here on this nude beach because their parents made them come; they would rather be texting their friends or downloading ringtones. From their vacant semblances Sturges wants to coax the same Bertolucci burnish in 2006 that he captured in 1976. Alas, XBox and wi-fi have leeched the enigma out of young eyes, leaving vapidity in the void where possibility used to reside. In the absence of the pregnant gaze of old, Sturges forces his models to turn away (as in Fanny, D106) or to feign depth where none is present. In Fanny, D107, the eponymous model flexes her forearm with Popeye machismo, but her sparkless eyes keep the image from being the feminist, genderqueer statement it desperately wants to be. And so Sturges retreats into the forest, photographing Vanessa et Miranda in backlit wide shot, two would-be sprites frolicking among the trees, reduced to silhouettes. Pity poor Sturges: Only distance and lighting tricks can turn his displaced mall rats into myths and metaphors.
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Empty Gazes”
Empty GazesPity poor Richard Speer. He can’t imagine a world in which Jock Sturges and his subjects work collaboratively on a life-long project of documenting the transformation from childhood ...
Love the picture. Now that is Fine Art!










