Fact Check
January 7th, 2009
Murmurs • Amid The Challenges, A Commitment To Show Up.0 comments
January 7th, 2009
Hot Air | An Oregon chemist tends the fires of global-warming deniers.1 comment
January 7th, 2009
Rogue of the Week • Barack Obama | Partying on our last dime8 comments
January 7th, 2009
Mobile Sten | What’s the man who was City Hall’s biggest deal maker doing in Bend?0 comments
January 7th, 2009
The Weekly Fix • Just Like Starting Over0 comments
January 7th, 2009
Cover Story • Jody De Simone Wants To Kick Your Ass | A Pearl District pr woman takes a “crash course” in mixed martial arts.25 comments
January 7th, 2009
Clearing The Smoke | More fights and outdoor urination, plus other predictions after the new smoking ban’s first week.
January 7th, 2009
The Score • Estate Of Denial | Think prosecuting elder abuse will be easy under Newly passed Measure 57? Maybe not.1 comment
January 7th, 2009
Letters to the Editor • Inbox0 comments
January 7th, 2009
Ask the Editor • What Were We Thinking? | WW Editor Mark Zusman answers your questions about our coverage.0 comments
![]() |
[May 24th, 2006] Two weeks after The Oregonian's Sunday edition ran a front-page profile of math whiz Mark Provo, the paper corrected five factual errors.
But Provo says those fixes don't address what he calls other errors of fact and a complete misrepresentation of his research by Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Tom Hallman Jr. "Unbelievable,'' Provo says of the corrections that ran May 21.
Provo says he received one email from Hallman's editor, Jack Hart, asking about a few biographical details, but that nobody contacted him about his broader and more serious complaints.
Among the alleged screw-ups that Provo says went unaddressed was a line that Provo subsisted on lettuce when strapped for cash and kept his clothes in a closet his motel room doesn't have (Provo says he kept those clothes in a suitcase. For more details, see www.markprovo.com).
Provo also says he was not allowed to rebut a professor who analyzed his work for the paper. Hart and Hallman did not return WW's calls and emails seeking comment.
Reporters inside the daily's newsroom say that collectively the mistakes raise concerns that "where there's smoke, there's fire" when it comes to Provo's harder-to-verify accusations that Hallman (now on the O's Ford quintuplets beat) fabricated scenes and put thoughts in Provo's head. Quick!
www.oregonlive.com/weblogs/editors/index.ssf?/mtlo...
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Fact Check”
Portland ErrogonTwo weeks for correcting errors in a story is another example of how the insufferable arrogance at the PO. There is absolutely no reason why the PO could not have quickly correc...
Fact CheckI think the Oregonian editor went a long way in showing what a flake this Mark Provo guy is in their blog entry. I thought the story reeked too much of journalistic novella and was tr...









