Logo
ISSUE #32.29 • NEWS • NEWS STORY

Fact Check

Social bookmarking | Permalink
Email | Print | Rate It! | 2 comments
Recently in "News"

January 7th, 2009
Murmurs • Amid The Challenges, A Commitment To Show Up.0 comments

January 7th, 2009
Hot Air | An Oregon chemist tends the fires of global-warming deniers.1 comment

January 7th, 2009
Rogue of the Week • Barack Obama | Partying on our last dime8 comments

January 7th, 2009
Mobile Sten | What’s the man who was City Hall’s biggest deal maker doing in Bend?0 comments

January 7th, 2009
The Weekly Fix • Just Like Starting Over0 comments

January 7th, 2009
Cover Story • Jody De Simone Wants To Kick Your Ass | A Pearl District pr woman takes a “crash course” in mixed martial arts.25 comments

January 7th, 2009
Clearing The Smoke | More fights and outdoor urination, plus other predictions after the new smoking ban’s first week.

1 comment

January 7th, 2009
The Score • Estate Of Denial | Think prosecuting elder abuse will be easy under Newly passed Measure 57? Maybe not.1 comment

January 7th, 2009
Letters to the Editor • Inbox0 comments

January 7th, 2009
Ask the Editor • What Were We Thinking? | WW Editor Mark Zusman answers your questions about our coverage.0 comments


BY IAN DEMSKY | idemsky at wweek dot com

[May 24th, 2006] Two weeks after The Oregonian's Sunday edition ran a front-page profile of math whiz Mark Provo, the paper corrected five factual errors.

But Provo says those fixes don't address what he calls other errors of fact and a complete misrepresentation of his research by Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Tom Hallman Jr. "Unbelievable,'' Provo says of the corrections that ran May 21.

Provo says he received one email from Hallman's editor, Jack Hart, asking about a few biographical details, but that nobody contacted him about his broader and more serious complaints.

Among the alleged screw-ups that Provo says went unaddressed was a line that Provo subsisted on lettuce when strapped for cash and kept his clothes in a closet his motel room doesn't have (Provo says he kept those clothes in a suitcase. For more details, see www.markprovo.com).

Provo also says he was not allowed to rebut a professor who analyzed his work for the paper. Hart and Hallman did not return WW's calls and emails seeking comment.

Reporters inside the daily's newsroom say that collectively the mistakes raise concerns that "where there's smoke, there's fire" when it comes to Provo's harder-to-verify accusations that Hallman (now on the O's Ford quintuplets beat) fabricated scenes and put thoughts in Provo's head. Quick!












icon Story continues below

advertisement

advertisement

NOTE: The Oregonian replied to Willamette Week after our print deadline with this response, which was posted on Oregon Live:

www.oregonlive.com/weblogs/editors/index.ssf?/mtlo...

 

Rate This Story
Be the first to rate this story.

 
read all 2 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “Fact Check”

1

Portland ErrogonTwo weeks for correcting errors in a story is another example of how the insufferable arrogance at the PO. There is absolutely no reason why the PO could not have quickly correc...

Story Forum Archive, May 24th, 2006 12:00am
2

Fact CheckI think the Oregonian editor went a long way in showing what a flake this Mark Provo guy is in their blog entry. I thought the story reeked too much of journalistic novella and was tr...

Story Forum Archive, May 24th, 2006 12:00am
 
 
 





Ad

Ad

Ad

Sponsored Links: WW Personals
Musician's Market
Snowboard Jackets
Legal Tips


Recently in Willamette Week
December 31st 1969