November 18th, 2009
Bureau Of Transportation | One more mouth to feed.5 comments
November 11th, 2009
Washington Co. DA’s Office | Abusing a domestic violence law.25 comments
November 4th, 2009
University Of Oregon | Who’s killing Rudolph?7 comments
October 28th, 2009
Metro | A blowhard answer to global warming? 6 comments
October 21st, 2009
Michael Ruppert | Peak trouble for an Oregon author.23 comments
October 7th, 2009
Beaverton Police | Zero tolerance for video recorders.11 comments
September 30th, 2009
Lynn Peterson | C’mon, Dems. Are Kitzhaber and Bradbury that formidable?3 comments
September 23rd, 2009
Denny Doyle | Beaverton mayor hits a foul ball.3 comments
September 2nd, 2009
Oregon Bankers Association | For bailouts, then against them.6 comments
August 19th, 2009
Wal-Mart | Save money. Live worse.9 comments
![]() Arno Political Consulting |
[February 25th, 2004] For veteran rogue-rousters, some activities naturally set off alarm bells. Take signature-gathering: Although the recent ban on per-signature bounties appears to have greatly reduced the amount of fraud, it hasn't eliminated another problem--the misleading sales pitch.
In recent days, the petitioners for Measure 36 have stepped up their signature-gathering on Portland streets. Like its predecessor, Measure 7, the measure would require that government reimburse property owners if their property value is affected by a regulation.
But, as Katy Daily, a politically savvy downtown pedestrian, noted, you'd have a hard time figuring that out based on what some signature gatherers (also known as "circulators") are saying.
Daily called the Rogue Desk to suggest we check out the circulators--who are on the payroll of Arno Political Consulting of Sacramento. Last week, we approached three separate circulators to see how they explained the measure.
In the first instance, the circulator at the corner of 10th Avenue and Yamhill Street told us the measure would prevent the government from devaluing your land, then taking it over using the courts--a process known as eminent domain.
"So this is about eminent domain?" the Rogue operative asked.
"Yeah," said the circulator.
That's not true. The misinformation was repeated by two other signature gatherers we interviewed and, according to Daily, several others near Pioneer Courthouse Square.
Oregonians In Action, the group sponsoring the measure and paying Arno, wasn't pleased to hear about this. "It absolutely concerns me if the signature gatherers are misrepresenting the measure," says OIA director Dave Hunnicutt. "I don't see a connection between this measure and eminent domain. If [misrepresentation] is happening, we will stop it."
Bill Arno, co-owner of Arno Consulting, told WW the "eminent domain" line isn't coming from his shop.
"We actually give people written pitch sheets that say nothing about eminent domain," Arno says. "If they are saying anything about eminent domain, then they have independently arrived at that conclusion and we'll take corrective action in our crew."
How about not turning in the signatures that were gathered dishonestly? "That's certainly something that we'd consider," says Hunnicutt. "I have no idea how to figure out how you would do that."
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Arno Political Consulting”
Arno Political ConsultingMy son, a signature circulator, has recently contracted with a financier to work for 18.50/hour in return for 26 signatures. To obtain the signatures he is sub-contrac...
The initiative that supposedly banned pay per signature was very broad in scope. Knowing that it was unconstitutional, the Secretary of State watered down its interpretation. Now that it has survived ...
Mr Michael R., isn't the biggest problem in petitioning rampant hair loss? I agree, pay per hour as a means of reducing fraud is completely non-sensical. It's not really the money that people are upse...











