November 18th, 2009
Bureau Of Transportation | One more mouth to feed.4 comments
November 11th, 2009
Washington Co. DA’s Office | Abusing a domestic violence law.24 comments
November 4th, 2009
University Of Oregon | Who’s killing Rudolph?7 comments
October 28th, 2009
Metro | A blowhard answer to global warming? 6 comments
October 21st, 2009
Michael Ruppert | Peak trouble for an Oregon author.23 comments
October 7th, 2009
Beaverton Police | Zero tolerance for video recorders.11 comments
September 30th, 2009
Lynn Peterson | C’mon, Dems. Are Kitzhaber and Bradbury that formidable?3 comments
September 23rd, 2009
Denny Doyle | Beaverton mayor hits a foul ball.3 comments
September 2nd, 2009
Oregon Bankers Association | For bailouts, then against them.6 comments
August 19th, 2009
Wal-Mart | Save money. Live worse.9 comments
![]() American Medical Response |
[September 8th, 2004] It's not always fair to sweat the small stuff. But there are places where picking nits seems appropriate. Ambulances, for example. That's why the results of a recent state inspection of American Medical Response, the company that contracts to provide Multnomah County's ambulance service, are troubling.
According to an Aug. 24 "letter of instruction" from the state to AMR, investigators found a litany of rule violations during a pre-arranged inspection of AMR's Portland operation on Aug. 10 and 11. The letter, which WW obtained through a public-records request, socks AMR for record-keeping quibbles. But it also says the company fails to stock enough medicine or replace outdated equipment and expired medications.
"[I]n several cases some of the supplies were critical and the units were prohibited from responding until fully stocked. In discussions with several of the employees they reported that it is not uncommon for on-duty crews to 'rob' off-duty cars of supplies not available in the supply room," according to the letter, which says inspectors found violations on all 16 ambulances they looked at.
The letter, which orders AMR to fix problems within 30 days, has the company crying foul. Spokesman Larry Harvey says the scathing assessment came "out of the blue" after AMR agreed to help the state, which hadn't inspected the company since 1997, test out a new inspection regime. Regional director Randy Lauer says the state flat didn't know what it was doing. He says many of the record-keeping violations were the product of misunderstandings and overhyped comments about minor problems with seldom-used medicines and equipment--nerve-gas antidote and spare flashlight batteries, for example.
"It was a very sloppy inspection," says Lauer, adding that all 16 ambulances were judged acceptable despite violations. "If they conduct this kind of inspection in other parts of the state, they're going to come under a lot of heat."
OK. That may be. But the fact is, AMR had 18 days advance warning of the inspection--if there was ever a chance to ace a pop quiz, this was it. And when it comes to emergency response, can't we be forgiven for being sticklers once in a while?
RECENT COMMENTS ON “American Medical Response”
AMR Multnomah County is a really crappy company. We get 15 minutes in the morning to check out the ambulance. If we take longer we get written up. The 15 minutes is not enough time to get the job done...
AMR is a company driven only by profits. The more time we dink around to properly stock our rigs the more money the company loses! Employees get caught in a cross fire trying to do their jobs the corr...
i am a supervisor at amr and i think we have to stay in the office in case something unforseen happens we cant worry about crews cryin all the time
AMR is not only sloppy but the moral amongst the employees is horrible. The managers where I worked are the good ole boy network who treat the employees like crap, so the ambulances are just one of th...













