Logo
Lovejoy Surgicenter
ISSUE #31.20 • NEWS • NEWS STORY

Don't Mess with Taxes


Portland joins effort to bring ratepayers' money back from Houston.

Social bookmarking | Permalink
Email | Print | Rate It! | 0 comments
Recently in "News"

December 3rd, 2008
Murmurs • Lights! Cameras! News!1 comment

December 3rd, 2008
The Score • Big Dam Fight | The Legislature may end a long-festering dispute affecting one billionaire, a half-million Oregonians and more fish than you can count.0 comments

December 3rd, 2008
Rogue of the Week • TMT Development | Bully in a bar fight.3 comments

December 3rd, 2008
An Old Addition | A manager twice accused of date rape is back at a Southeast bar.0 comments

December 3rd, 2008
Letters to the Editor • Inbox0 comments

December 3rd, 2008
Scrooged! | Doesn’t matter if you’re naughty or nice. Here’s who the economy is causing to get scratched off gift lists. 0 comments

December 3rd, 2008
Hoop Dreams | Can the Blazers really be this good?0 comments

December 3rd, 2008
Uneasy Riders | Ticket to gripe: Trimetdown.com.0 comments

December 3rd, 2008
Cover Story • The Naked And The Dread | The Recession has knocked everything but our socks off.1 comment

December 3rd, 2008
The Weekly Fix • Our Spin On 7 Days of News 0 comments


BY NIGEL JAQUISS | njaquiss at wweek dot com

[March 23rd, 2005] Fresh from helping to defeat Texas Pacific Group's bid for Portland General Electric, the City of Portland is joining with a PGE nemesis to wrestle back millions of local tax dollars from PGE.

PGE has previously acknowledged having collected about $7 million from Multnomah County ratepayers since 1997 to cover the utility's county income-tax bill. But rather than passing those taxes along, it gave the money to its now-bankrupt parent company, Enron, which pocketed all but $4,000 (see "Enron's Tax Holiday," WW, Jan. 19, 2005).

PGE's rationale: It files a joint tax return with Enron, and Enron has consistently reported large losses more than enough to offset PGE's profits. Thus, it is OK for the Texas energy giant to siphon the local dollars. "PGE and other utilities are following Oregon tax rules and a PUC directive," says Kregg Arntson, a PGE spokesman.

Dan Meek and Linda Williams, lawyers with the Utility Reform Project who have long battled PGE, disagree. In January, they filed an initial $7 million lawsuit seeking to halt PGE's collection of the tax; in late February, they amended their lawsuit to seek class-action status for Multnomah County residents, which could allow the collection of triple damages.

PGE then sought a ruling from the state Public Utility Commission seeking a clarification of the utility's ability to collect and not pay the tax. "This is an issue that has been capturing the interest of the public," Arntson says. "We're asking the commission for direction."













icon Story continues below

advertisement
OMSI
advertisement

Meek says the issue turns on a PUC rule that says a utility is allowed to collect any taxes from ratepayers that it is required to pay. But he argues PGE's conduct is inconsistent.

"If they are 'required to pay' the tax, they can collect it," he says. "I have no problem with that. But since they didn't pay the tax-and they admit that-they must not be required to."

That's where the city comes in. Under a longstanding agreement with Multnomah County, the City's Bureau of Licenses collects the county's Business Income Tax-the local tax that PGE is collecting but not paying.

Commissioner Randy Leonard, who ran Licenses until Mayor Tom Potter took all the bureaus in for budgeting, is pushing for PGE to fork over the $7 million it gave to Enron.

So on March 9, the day before the PUC sent Texas Pacific packing, deputy city attorney Ben Walters filed a motion with the PUC asking to intervene in the dispute.

Aside from getting stiffed as a tax collector, the city has two reasons for intervening: It is also one of PGE's largest customers, with an annual bill of about $8.5 million, and therefore is paying a lot of taxes into the utility's pocket. "The outcome of this proceeding will have a significant impact on the City's fiscal interests," Walters wrote.

Rate This Story
Be the first to rate this story.

 
read all 0 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “Don't Mess with Taxes”

 
 
 




OMSI
Ad
ART
Ad

Ad

Sponsored Links: WW Personals
Musician's Market
Snowboard Jackets
Legal Tips


Recently in Willamette Week
December 3rd 2008The Naked And The Dread | The Recession has knocked everything but our socks off.
December 3rd 2008Paulson’s Pitch | Why does Hank Paulson’s son want $85 million of your money?
December 3rd 2008House Of Gain | Aleksey Kalenichenko’s real-estate schemes cost banks hundreds of thousands of dollars. It’s still a mystery how he pulled it off.
December 3rd 2008Just Add Milk | Director Gus Van Sant delivers the story of the gay-rights movement’s patron saint in his most political film to date.
December 3rd 2008Core Issue | Barack Obama says the way we pay teachers is rotten. Does Bill Sizemore (Bill Sizemore?!) have the answer?
December 3rd 2008Ad Nauseam | Do TV ads about hot dogs, golf clubs and rape work? We bring in the experts.
December 3rd 2008WW Voters’ Guide, November 2008 | Tough choices, no brainers: Our endorsements for the general election.
December 3rd 2008Unlucky Strike | The Oregon lottery is going into detox—and our state budget is along for the smoke-free ride.
December 3rd 2008Jail Junkies | Who knows more about stopping property crime: Kevin Mannix or an ex-addict who stole 1,000 cars?