CUTTING CAMPAIGN CHECKS
How Portland's new campaign-money rules have worked elsewhere.
December 3rd, 2008
Murmurs • Lights! Cameras! News!1 comment
December 3rd, 2008
The Score • Big Dam Fight | The Legislature may end a long-festering dispute affecting one billionaire, a half-million Oregonians and more fish than you can count.0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
Rogue of the Week • TMT Development | Bully in a bar fight.3 comments
December 3rd, 2008
An Old Addition | A manager twice accused of date rape is back at a Southeast bar.0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
Letters to the Editor • Inbox0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
Scrooged! | Doesn’t matter if you’re naughty or nice. Here’s who the economy is causing to get scratched off gift lists. 0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
Hoop Dreams | Can the Blazers really be this good?0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
Uneasy Riders | Ticket to gripe: Trimetdown.com.0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
Cover Story • The Naked And The Dread | The Recession has knocked everything but our socks off.1 comment
December 3rd, 2008
The Weekly Fix • Our Spin On 7 Days of News 0 comments
![]() IMAGE: ERIC KILKENNY |
[June 1st, 2005] Barring a last-minute petition frenzy in the next couple of weeks, Portland will become the first city in America to offer full public campaign funding to give taxpayer money to qualifying City Hall candidates.
Supporters of Portland's new system say the option will attract more diverse candidates and curb big money's influence. Foes say it's a boondoggle in the making.
Arizona and Maine have offered public funds to state candidates for several years.If past is prologue, here's what's happened in those two states to illustrate the reform's promises-and potential problems.
In 2002, Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano, a Democrat, used public funds to narrowly beat a Republican who didn't tap taxpayer money.
In Maine, despite minor abuses, public financing-which voters established by initiative in 1996-is highly popular. Nearly 80 percent of state legislative candidates in 2004 used public campaign money.
State Rep. Deborah Pelletier-Simpson, a Democrat, was a waitress and single mom when she waged her first campaign in 2000. Now she's the chair of Maine's House Judiciary Committee. "I was living in poverty," she says. "It's safe to say that I wouldn't be here if it weren't for public financing."
Candidates for the Maine House need to collect 50 checks to qualify for $4,000. Based on her experience, Pelletier-Simpson says Portland shouldn't expect the flood of free-spending novelty candidates some critics predict.
"Getting 50 checks sounds easy, but it isn't," she says.
Other stories aren't so heartwarming.
In 2003, the Tucson Citizen detailed public-financing abuses that included three thirtysomething Libertarians buying booze and hiring goofy-costumed canvassers for a "youth-oriented" campaign.
One candidate used public money to pay his Screen Actors Guild dues. Several legislative hopefuls put family members on the payroll as consultants. This March, the Arizona elections commission kicked a state representative out of office for exceeding the financing system's funding limits.
Portland City Auditor Gary Blackmer, who along with Commissioner Erik Sten wrote the city's new campaign rules, says public money can be monitored. Blackmer notes that Arizona's wrongdoers were caught-the Libertarians, for instance, had to give the money back.
A seven-person commission appointed by Portland's mayor and council will govern Portland's system. Along with the auditor's office, it will have the power to fine misbehaving candidates and recapture misspent funds.
"If a candidate has a brother who suddenly becomes a political expert,'' Blackmer says, "ultimately they'll have to pay the money back."
The Oregon Restaurant Association flirted with a petition drive to refer the council decision to the ballot. But the powerful lobby appears to be backing down, as public-finance supporters lean on local restaurateurs.
RECENT COMMENTS ON “CUTTING CAMPAIGN CHECKS”










