Logo
Lovejoy Surgicenter
ISSUE #31.31 • NEWS • FEEDBACK
[LETTERS TO THE EDITOR]

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR


6/8/2005

Recently in "Letters to the Editor"

November 18th, 2009
Inbox1 comment

November 11th, 2009
Inbox2 comments

November 4th, 2009
Inbox1 comment

October 28th, 2009
Inbox0 comments

October 21st, 2009
Inbox1 comment

October 14th, 2009
Inbox1 comment

October 7th, 2009
Inbox5 comments

September 30th, 2009
Inbox2 comments

September 23rd, 2009
Inbox2 comments

September 16th, 2009
Inbox0 comments

BY WW EDITORIAL STAFF | newsdesk at wweek dot com

[June 8th, 2005] Artbroken

"Where's the Art?," Angela Valdez's May 18 cover story investigating Richard Valencia (a.k.a. Russell Blackburn) and his shady dealings with 82-year-old Margaret Rosenborg, was important and well-researched. In the interest of accuracy and to give readers a sense of just how large Margaret's loss is, I feel compelled to provide a bit more information.

Contrary to the assertion that my gallery's sales of Ralph Rosenborg paintings "never earned more than a few thousand dollars," the 60 paintings I sold amounted to at least $150,000.

Besides the $21,000 and the 58 paintings (worth well over $200,000 now, and far more should there be a major Rosenborg retrospective), Richard Valencia also "borrowed" many irreplaceable archival materials (letters, photographs, early catalogs, etc.) with which to write his skinny "book." He refuses to acknowledge even that he has them.

Valdez writes, "Margaret says she doesn't know who to trust. Mark Woolley, without her permission, dropped off a letter at Valencia's Roseburg home demanding the paintings be returned...." Valencia lives in Redmond, not Roseburg. I happened to be in Central Oregon and received Margaret's explicit permission in a phone call to deliver the letter before actually doing so.

We thought Valencia might avail himself of "doing the right thing" before press time. Instead, he chose to ignore the requests. He can still write his own ending to this sad story.













icon Story continues below

advertisement

advertisement

Mark A. Woolley
Northwest 9th Avenue

sauceboxer Rebellion

My weekly lunchtime ritual is to sit down with the newest copy of Willamette Week. You can imagine my horror when I read the May 11 issue's scathing review ["Drink and Be Merry"] of Saucebox, which has been around for 10 years and received rave reviews in national publications.

Nancy Rommelmann was all over the place in her writing. Part of me was laughing at her absurdity, the other part of me was blown away at how mean-spirited her review was. My guess she was having a bad day and took it out on the restaurant.

Anytime I have been to Saucebox, we have enjoyed the music and haven't had to compete with the clanging of downtown traffic. The dim sum pupu platter for two, which she described as tasting "as though it was pulled from the freezer case," is hands-down one of the best appetizers out there. Perhaps Ms. Rommelmann's taste buds aren't fully developed to appreciate good food when she tastes it. And maybe she shouldn't write her reviews "hung over" from all of the mojitos she managed to suck down. I also find it odd that she didn't mention the baked coconut cream she had, as stated in her online journal (http://www.nancyrommelmann.typepad.com).

Saucebox's owners shouldn't get worked up, though; it's not like she's a New York Times food critic. This, too, shall pass.

Marna Gatlin
Warren



Rate This Story
Be the first to rate this story.

 
read all 4 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “LETTERS TO THE EDITOR”

1

Provincialism againI'm tired of Portlanders dismissing other Portlanders for not being of "national" importance. To do so is itself the height of provincialism--and rather self-hating at that....

Story Forum Archive, Jun 9th, 2005 12:00am
2

Marna Gatlin's Faulty LogicWhat weird logic. According to Ms. Gatlin, if a reviewer does not like a dish at a restaurant, the only possible explanation is that he or she must be having a bad da...

Story Forum Archive, Jun 9th, 2005 12:00am
3

CorrectionHey Marna, get some specs: I mentioned the coconut cream in the review, not on my blog. But thanks for the link.—Nancy

Story Forum Archive, Jun 25th, 2005 12:00am
4

LETTERS TO THE EDITORYou know what folks when I am wrong I am wrong. I actually went to Ms. Rommelmann's website and read her bio. So my apologies all around. I still dig Saucebox's food:)

Story Forum Archive, Jan 5th, 2006 12:00am
 
 
 





Recently in Willamette Week
December 31st 1969Washington State | The Canada of Oregon has it all—a Stonehenge replica, a longboarder's concrete wet dream and dark, damp underground lava caves. Vive les rocks.
December 31st 1969Oregon's Outer Edges | Crater Lake. Hell's Canyon. Wallowa and Steens mountain ranges. Hell, yeah.
December 31st 1969Central Oregon/High Desert | No rain, plenty of snow, obsidian flows and great local beer. The folks from the real eastside know how to unbend outside.
December 31st 1969Great Cascades/Columbia Gorge | With plenty of room to roam—and hot springs for your weary feet—it's the place to ramble and relax for the weekend.
December 31st 1969Willamette Valley | Monks, tracks, tubing and wine make the fertile strip a virile place to play.
December 31st 1969Stumptown | Tons of public parks, an extinct volcano and nude beach volleyball to keep you jolly. Get out and collect those merit badges, without leaving the city.
December 31st 1969The Coast | The beaches are public. You own them. Go play—hike in the old-growth forests.
December 31st 1969Cycle Tour 101: Your on-bike guide to Highway 101 | To ride the greatest bike route in Oregon, you need to get out of Portland.
December 31st 1969Doggin' It | What happens when a Portland running club jogs with pooches from the pound?
December 31st 1969Over the Edge | Sam Drevo will paddle yr ass.