THE HUNT FOR DEEP VOLT
State pursuing leak in Texas Pacific_PGE deal.
December 3rd, 2008
Murmurs • Lights! Cameras! News!1 comment
December 3rd, 2008
The Score • Big Dam Fight | The Legislature may end a long-festering dispute affecting one billionaire, a half-million Oregonians and more fish than you can count.0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
Rogue of the Week • TMT Development | Bully in a bar fight.3 comments
December 3rd, 2008
An Old Addition | A manager twice accused of date rape is back at a Southeast bar.0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
Letters to the Editor • Inbox0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
Scrooged! | Doesn’t matter if you’re naughty or nice. Here’s who the economy is causing to get scratched off gift lists. 0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
Hoop Dreams | Can the Blazers really be this good?0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
Uneasy Riders | Ticket to gripe: Trimetdown.com.0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
Cover Story • The Naked And The Dread | The Recession has knocked everything but our socks off.1 comment
December 3rd, 2008
The Weekly Fix • Our Spin On 7 Days of News 0 comments
![]() |
[June 29th, 2005] While Texas Pacific Group has moved on from its failed purchase of Portland General Electric, Oregon utility regulators are now focused on who leaked information damaging to the now-dead deal.
On behalf of Oregon's Public Utility Commission, the state Justice Department sent letters to 18 parties who had access to information ruled confidential by the commission about the deal when it was alive.In January, two months before the PUC nixed the $2.35 billion Texas Pacific purchase, WW published documents that contradicted Texas Pacific's public statements about running PGE (see "The PGE Papers," Jan. 5, 2005).
The documents revealed that Texas Pacific had privately concluded PGE was poorly run and that Texas Pacific could easily lay off hundreds of PGE employees, make more than a billion dollars in five years and probably sell PGE to another utility.
The letter last week from Senior Assistant Attorney General Tim Nord seeks a voluntary confession. If that doesn't happen, Nord promises to proceed with subpoenas and interviews in an investigation that he called "an expense and burden, brought about by the unlawful actions of a minority of the participants." (WW has not received a letter.)
Asked why to spend taxpayer money on chasing down a leak from a group that includes industry organizations, watchdog organizations and other utilities, Nord and PUC spokesman Bob Valdez cited a need to protect the integrity of future cases by safeguarding the disclosure and review of "sensitive" materials. The commission could not immediately estimate how much the probe has, or could, cost.
Among the potential sanctions are a $10,000 fine per violation of the confidentiality order.
"We take this leak very seriously," Valdez says. "But it might prove difficult to correct."
RECENT COMMENTS ON “THE HUNT FOR DEEP VOLT”
So What?The deal is dead and Oregonians are the better for it. Thank God for the leak.—Pravda or Consequences
whistle-blower protection?Doesn't Oregon have a whistle-blower protection law? What about the Feds? This certainly would be a good time to use it or speedily pass a retroactive bill through t...
YOU need to keep digging deeper.[I edited, for readability, some stuff from the last attempt to post a comment. Feel free to remove the brackets below, and this note here.]I had been trying to ...
whistle-blower protection?Doesn't Oregon have a whistle-blower protection law? What about the Feds? This certainly would be a good time to use it or speedily pass a retroactive bill through t...









