TWO WHEELS, TOO FURIOUS
Cyclists feeling left out on new and "improved" St. Johns Bridge.
December 3rd, 2008
Murmurs • Lights! Cameras! News!1 comment
December 3rd, 2008
The Score • Big Dam Fight | The Legislature may end a long-festering dispute affecting one billionaire, a half-million Oregonians and more fish than you can count.0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
Rogue of the Week • TMT Development | Bully in a bar fight.3 comments
December 3rd, 2008
An Old Addition | A manager twice accused of date rape is back at a Southeast bar.0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
Letters to the Editor • Inbox0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
Scrooged! | Doesn’t matter if you’re naughty or nice. Here’s who the economy is causing to get scratched off gift lists. 0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
Hoop Dreams | Can the Blazers really be this good?0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
Uneasy Riders | Ticket to gripe: Trimetdown.com.0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
Cover Story • The Naked And The Dread | The Recession has knocked everything but our socks off.1 comment
December 3rd, 2008
The Weekly Fix • Our Spin On 7 Days of News 0 comments
![]() IMAGE: BIANCA BOSKER |
[August 3rd, 2005] Local cyclists are spinning their wheels in anger at the restriping of four lanes of traffic-with no room for bicycles-on the renovated St. Johns Bridge.
Cyclists say the no-bike-lanes decision by the state, which owns and maintains Portland's northernmost bridge, unfairly favors freight interests over bike safety.
"Clearly, there are powerful interests here," said Evan Manvel, executive director of the advocacy group Bicycle Transportation Alliance. "This is a missed opportunity."
The striping, which wrapped up last week on the nearly completed bridge project, limits biking access to a 5-foot-wide sidewalk shared with pedestrians. The extension of the narrow sidewalks by up to 4 feet around the bridge towers was the only improvement for cycling.
The Oregon Department of Transportation began the $38 million renovation in 2003 to restore the historic suspension bridge to its former glory. But bike advocates fear ODOT is taking this message way too literally, rejecting their alternative plan to limit the mid-bridge traffic lanes to one in each direction, leaving a wide shoulder on each side for bikers.
ODOT regional manager Charlie Sciscione doesn't necessarily disagree, but he believes there's no better solution for a span that averages 24,000 cars and trucks a day. "It's an old bridge," he said. "The lanes are too narrow. But it's a treasure."
Before the project began, ODOT assembled a board that included bike advocates, the City of Portland, TriMet, the Port of Portland, freight interests, and St. Johns residents.
A board majority decided the alternative striping plan created its own safety issues, and that freight must take priority because the bridge opens onto Highway 30.
Nevertheless, cyclists see the project limiting bike access in North Portland and blowing an opportunity to make safe links for cyclists across the river.
On July 19, activists organized a naked bike ride across the bridge to protest the plan. The nude ride went off smoothly, attracting 17 bare bikers, although an apparent lack of signage illustrating their cause left the nude riders feeling a bit uncovered.
RECENT COMMENTS ON “TWO WHEELS, TOO FURIOUS”
Guess it's my week to come across as an anti-bike arseYes, bike lines would be nice, but to cut the space for auto traffic IN HALF by reducing it to a two lane bridge is in no way an acceptable...
Bad Argument>until there are 24,000 bikes crossing the bridge each day as well.Which there never will be without Bike lanes that make Biking safer and m,ore attractive. By going four lanes, it...
2 WHEELS....2FURIOUS...I'm in desperate need of some wdk40 my bikes a little oily and needs attention, I have a big race tomorrow against my rival and I want to kick his ass, please give me som...










