Death And Taxes
November 19th, 2008
Meltdown Lowdown | So how is Portland’s new, new economy looking now?0 comments
November 19th, 2008
Letters to the Editor • Inbox0 comments
November 19th, 2008
The Tragic 8 Pall | One more thing from California for Oregonians to object to: Prop 8.3 comments
November 19th, 2008
Tug Of War | A controversial prof creates a skirmish at PSU over academic freedom. 25 comments
November 19th, 2008
Rogue of the Week • Butch Miller | Un-fare play.18 comments
November 19th, 2008
Nonviolent Femmes | Sisters of the Road invites Portland to come learn the steps of the nonviolent movement.0 comments
November 19th, 2008
Murmurs • News That Needs No Background Check27 comments
November 19th, 2008
Off The Mic | Local hip-hop artist faces extortion charge just before his album debuts.17 comments
November 19th, 2008
Cover Story • House Of Gain | Aleksey Kalenichenko’s real-estate schemes cost banks hundreds of thousands of dollars. It’s still a mystery how he pulled it off.11 comments
November 19th, 2008
The Weekly Fix • The Weekly Fix | Our Spin On 7 Days of News0 comments
![]() |
[October 5th, 2005] Chances are, you'll never be affected by the estate tax that some in Congress are laboring to repeal.
Unless you've got a wealthy aunt about to croak or have tucked away a Xanadu to leave to your heirs, you probably won't approach the $1.5 million that can expose some assets to a tax of more than 45 percent.
Yet supporters of repealing the levy, which they label the "death tax," shout about its being a morbid grab from the dead and the downfall of mom-'n'-pop businesses. While most of those moms, pops and other constituents are unlikely to be taxed post-mortem (with deductions and exemptions, the tax hits less than 2 percent of dying adults), it's a little more personal for many lawmakers in Washington.
Here's a look at the gross assets of Oregon's congressional delegation, based on their annual financial disclosure forms (which collects info in broad dollar ranges), and where their estates would land if the pols happened to keel over before the question comes up for a vote. The conclusion: This is more a party vote than a wealth-based one.
| Name | Party | Total assets (2004) | Subject to the tax? | Position on repealing? | Fun fact! |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sen. Gordon Smith | Republican | $ 8 million -$38 million | Yes | Yes | Richest senator in the Northwest. |
| Sen. Ron Wyden | Democrat | $964,000 -$2.1 million | Perhaps | No (voted for repeal in 2002) | Recently married Nancy Bass, co-owner of New York City's Strand Bookstore-Wyden's assets are sure to grow. |
| Rep. Earl Blumenauer | Democrat | $2 million -$5 million | Yes | No | Owns at least nine properties in Portland. |
| Rep. David Wu | Democrat | $494,000 -$678,000 | No | No | Wu gets no pay for serving on two Portland boards. |
| Rep. Darlene Hooley | Democrat | $253,000 -$646,000 | No | No | Apparently Oregon's "poorest" lawmaker. |
| Rep. Greg Walden | Republican | $2 million -$6 million | Yes | Yes | Owns Columbia Gorge Broadcasters, which pipes talk radio and "good time oldies" into Hood River. |
| Rep. Peter DeFazio | Democrat | $563,000 -$1.5 million | Unlikely | No | Oregon's messiest personal financial disclosure: a hand-scrawled report. |
advertisement
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Death And Taxes”









