Where Money Grows On Trees
How a nature lover's unclear final wishes led to clear-cutting trees —and the Audubon Society making money out of the deal.
November 19th, 2008
Meltdown Lowdown | So how is Portland’s new, new economy looking now?0 comments
November 19th, 2008
Letters to the Editor • Inbox0 comments
November 19th, 2008
The Tragic 8 Pall | One more thing from California for Oregonians to object to: Prop 8.3 comments
November 19th, 2008
Tug Of War | A controversial prof creates a skirmish at PSU over academic freedom. 25 comments
November 19th, 2008
Rogue of the Week • Butch Miller | Un-fare play.18 comments
November 19th, 2008
Nonviolent Femmes | Sisters of the Road invites Portland to come learn the steps of the nonviolent movement.0 comments
November 19th, 2008
Murmurs • News That Needs No Background Check27 comments
November 19th, 2008
Off The Mic | Local hip-hop artist faces extortion charge just before his album debuts.17 comments
November 19th, 2008
Cover Story • House Of Gain | Aleksey Kalenichenko’s real-estate schemes cost banks hundreds of thousands of dollars. It’s still a mystery how he pulled it off.11 comments
November 19th, 2008
The Weekly Fix • The Weekly Fix | Our Spin On 7 Days of News0 comments
![]() A stumping conclusion for a naturalist's beloved trees. IMAGE: KEVIN BROOKS |
[February 15th, 2006] When Lawrence Schlottman died at age 83, he was buried with his wife, Norma, and his pet crow, Daisy.
Schlottman's choice in death didn't surprise neighbors of his 3.4-acre property, home to cedar, Douglas fir and maple trees on the Tualatin River near I-205.
"He would come out on the weekends and just sit on his property and watch the birds," says one of those neighbors, Kevin Brooks.
What does surprise Brooks and others is what became of Schlottman's beloved property nearly five years after his death in 2001: Half of it has been clear-cut.
Schlottman, who had no children, willed his assets to the Audubon Society of Portland, putting them in a trust administered by the Bank of America.
Schlottman's will says trust income is to be used first to care for another pet bird "for the remainder of [its] natural life," then to be used "for the feeding of wild birds" and to support the Audubon Society.
So when a developer bought Schlottman's property in December and started clear-cutting, the Audubon Society landed in the uncomfortable position of getting interest from a trust fattened by money from a sale that ended up destroying natural habitat.
Brooks says Schlottman told him his will would have provisions that his property never be developed. But Schlottman's will never mentions protecting the property.
Real-estate agent Annie Johnson listed the property on the bank's behalf for $425,000 last September. Johnson says John Margeson, a vice president in Bank of America's trust real estate office in Seattle, told her the bank had talked with the Audubon Society about the potential sale and that "it had all been settled."
advertisement
Margeson told her the bank preferred the land not be clear-cut, but that there would be no legal restrictions on the sale. Johnson ended up agreeing to $317,500 for the property from Habib Shekarriz, because the site was not selling due to nearby freeway noise.
After the sale, Johnson talked with Shekarriz about keeping the property in its natural state, but she says there was no legal way to prevent the new owner from cutting the trees.
Meryl Redisch, executive director of the Audubon Society of Portland, says her nonprofit group told the bank a year ago that it wanted the property protected. She wrote the bank on Jan. 25 asking why it had sold the property without restrictions and expressing dismay that the recent sale "damages our work and our reputation."
Margeson referred WW's questions to Rich Brown, a senior vice president with Bank of America in Portland. Brown said the bank would not discuss client relationships but added it followed Schlottman's directives.
Zoning restrictions allow only a single-family house on the site, and Shekarriz plans to build a house there. He declined to give any more details.
As for Brooks, he stresses he doesn't have a beef with the new owner. "He owns the property, he's a developer," he says. "He can tear out the trees and build a million-dollar mansion if he wants to."
But Brooks wonders why all this had to happen to land that he described as "as natural as nature gets."
"Now," Brooks says, "there are just piles and piles of debris."
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Where Money Grows On Trees”
Where Money Grows On TreesAudubon obviously knew there were no protections if the property were sold.The money was just too tempting.Sort of the same thing when they behave and be silent when o...
Where Money Grows On TreesEven the noblest of institutions seem to lose focus when money fogs their view.When most of the income and monies acquired by charitable organizations go toward admini...
Where Money Grows On TreesAudubon Society of Portland is heart sick over the destruction of Mr. Schlottman's property. Anyone who would think for a minute that my organization would countenance...









