November 4th, 2009
University Of Oregon | Who’s killing Rudolph?5 comments
October 28th, 2009
Metro | A blowhard answer to global warming? 5 comments
October 21st, 2009
Michael Ruppert | Peak trouble for an Oregon author.23 comments
October 7th, 2009
Beaverton Police | Zero tolerance for video recorders.11 comments
September 30th, 2009
Lynn Peterson | C’mon, Dems. Are Kitzhaber and Bradbury that formidable?3 comments
September 23rd, 2009
Denny Doyle | Beaverton mayor hits a foul ball.3 comments
September 2nd, 2009
Oregon Bankers Association | For bailouts, then against them.6 comments
August 19th, 2009
Wal-Mart | Save money. Live worse.9 comments
August 12th, 2009
Rep. Earl Blumenauer | Phoning it in.15 comments
August 5th, 2009
Brenda Sturdevant | Offended by a miniskirt.3 comments
![]() |
[June 14th, 2006] You'd think bean curd would practically sell itself in Portland, which www.goveg.com calls "the nation's leading vegetarian city."
But apparently this week's Rogue, Dae Han Tofu, felt its white, flabby cubes needed to be a little more attractive to Portland's health nuts. A routine federal inspection of the company's Northwest Portland facility revealed several violations.
Namely, the Food and Drug Administration contended in a May 11 warning letter to Dae Han Tofu that the protein content of its Organic Tofu was only 61 percent of what the label claimed. FDA spokeswoman Stephanie Magill says every food product must contain at least 80 percent of the nutritional levels advertised on its label.
Besides accusing Dae Han owner Calvin Chun of inflated protein counts, the FDA also charged Chun with mislabeling his entire product line.
All five of his tofu creations' packages bragged about being "low calorie." But even the leanest among them exceeded the FDA's definition for that term. Dae Han's worst offender, its "Hot-n-Spicy" variety, topped the standard by as much as four times.
The FDA also said Chun's wares did not deserve the "high protein" label they brandished. The FDA requires so-called high-protein foods to deliver 20 percent of consumers' daily needs for protein. Dae Han falls short of that, serving up from 10 to 15 percent.
Chun, who was threatened by the FDA with product seizure as a penalty for the violations, told WW he would change the labels to reflect the lab's findings. But he adds that it would be nearly impossible to meet the FDA's standards.
Really? The FDA database shows no records of any other tofu manufacturers in the Northwest being charged with mislabeling at any time in the past five years.
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Dae Han Tofu”
Dae Han Tofu was the BEST. Another local OTA Tofu runs a solid second to Calvins INCREDIBLE Dae Han tofu. Myself and other business owners who used Dae Han loved the company.
Will...
Stats vary greatly at times.This article is weird isn't it? This labeling issue happens all the time and the FDA just works with the company and IT IS NEVER made an issue in the local press. I as a a...












