November 18th, 2009
Bureau Of Transportation | One more mouth to feed.5 comments
November 11th, 2009
Washington Co. DA’s Office | Abusing a domestic violence law.25 comments
November 4th, 2009
University Of Oregon | Who’s killing Rudolph?7 comments
October 28th, 2009
Metro | A blowhard answer to global warming? 6 comments
October 21st, 2009
Michael Ruppert | Peak trouble for an Oregon author.23 comments
October 7th, 2009
Beaverton Police | Zero tolerance for video recorders.11 comments
September 30th, 2009
Lynn Peterson | C’mon, Dems. Are Kitzhaber and Bradbury that formidable?3 comments
September 23rd, 2009
Denny Doyle | Beaverton mayor hits a foul ball.3 comments
September 2nd, 2009
Oregon Bankers Association | For bailouts, then against them.6 comments
August 19th, 2009
Wal-Mart | Save money. Live worse.9 comments
![]() |
[November 8th, 2006] Here at Rogue Central, we've been keeping our eye on how this week's designee, the Portland Development Commission, has handled a piece of property at Southwest 3rd Avenue and Oak Street (see "Suite Deal, WW, June 14, 2006).
The basic issue: In 2002, PDC paid about $1.7 million to buy and fix up that long-decrepit property, then valued it at negative $2.7 million in order to give it to developer Trammell Crow this year. (The benefit: If the property is deemed worthless, the developer doesn't have to pay union wages, which are higher.)
In July, City Commissioner Randy Leonard got suspicious enough to demand an independent audit of the 3rd and Oak transactions, a move that infuriated Mayor Tom Potter but won council support. A preliminary draft of the audit, conducted for the city by ECONorthwest and Integra Realty Resources, shows the property is worth $1.86 million—or $4.56 million more than PDC's negative valuation.
But City Attorney Linda Meng wrote an email to Leonard last week explaining the final version of the audit was taking longer than anticipated because "PDC has provided some documents for review but has not yet provided all documents.... In particular, emails and other documents they consider confidential have not been provided."
So it came to this: A wholly owned agency of the city refusing to turn over records—not to some lowly reporter, but to an auditor hired by the city attorney under a council resolution.
Leonard, who has long criticized the PDC for not sharing information and resisting a council review of its budget, took the extraordinary step Monday of filing a resolution asking Meng to subpoena the withheld records. That's a move usually reserved for adversarial legal proceedings—not inter-office communication.
After Leonard filed his resolution, PDC finally offered to turn over its emails and documents, which agency spokesman John Jackley says should be exempt under public records law. Leonard says the offer comes with conditions he's unwilling to accept.
"Their secrecy makes my point about the need for more council oversight better than I ever could," Leonard says.
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Portland Development Commission”
What possible catastrophe can cause a property to drop $4.4 million in value in 4 years? And if the cause of this unimaginable loss has to be remedied by Trammell Crow , who will determine if the prop...
Willamette Week has misrepresented this story from its original lead article to this Rogue of the Week article. First of all, there is NO appraisal at -$2.7 million. There is a memo provided as pure...













