Logo
Lovejoy Surgicenter
ISSUE #33.15 • NEWS • NEWS STORY

North By Northwest


Is Scott Caplan a cloak-and-dagger Portland lawyer, or did the CIA fool him into helping torture accused terrorists?

Social bookmarking | Permalink
Email | Print | Rate It! | 8 comments
Recently in "News"

July 2nd, 2008
Cover Story • Manhunter | Almost every state lets bounty hunters chase down its most wanted. Why doesn’t Oregon?63 comments

July 2nd, 2008
Bill Of Fair | Ex-restaurateur puts hopes of returning to Portland in a “widow’s bill.” 0 comments

July 2nd, 2008
Murmurs • Scoundrels seeking a refuge besides patriotism? You’re always welcome here.2 comments

July 2nd, 2008
Rogue of the Week • Legacy Good Samaritan | Please, go by streetcar20 comments

July 2nd, 2008
Broadcast Dues | While Portland Beavers go up to the major leagues, the team’s broadcaster soldiers on.1 comment

July 2nd, 2008
Blog Of War | Online chat about a Georgia weapons manufacturer ends in real-time Oregon court battle.10 comments

July 2nd, 2008
Textual Criticism | MSG FM CMSR SAM: WHR R U GOING? WATCH THE ROAD!!16 comments

July 2nd, 2008
The Reed Guard | A woman sues for alleged sex assault in another case involving the College’s security.16 comments

July 2nd, 2008
The Score • Escapees and exiles edition.0 comments

July 2nd, 2008
Letters to the Editor • Inbox5 comments


BY JAMES PITKIN | jpitkin at wweek dot com

[February 21st, 2007]

There appears little doubt Portland lawyer Scott Caplan worked for the CIA. The question is, did he know it?

In August 2003, when shadowy figures started a company in Oregon that subsequent reports linked to the CIA's practice of flying terror suspects to other countries to be tortured, it was Caplan—a $250-an-hour local business lawyer—who filed the paperwork with the state.

If it was anonymity the backers of the company called Bayard Foreign Marketing LLC wanted, they found it in Caplan.

A 46-year-old father of two from suburban West Linn, Caplan coaches youth soccer and works in the unadorned Pittock Block building in downtown Portland. Most of his work in 20 years of practice has been for small companies that need help filing articles of incorporation, reviewing contracts and dealing with workers.

While Caplan may have seemed a perfect cover, things went seriously awry when the national press jumped on the story, part of a larger investigation into a worldwide network of secret CIA prisons used in the war on terror. Reporters for the Associated Press and the Chicago Tribune found out the company's listed owner—Leonard T. Bayard—had no official history and didn't appear to exist.

Now Caplan finds himself alone, facing difficult new questions from the Oregon State Bar, which is investigating a complaint that he represented Bayard under false pretenses.

Caplan gave WW his first interview last week since retired political science professor Michael Munk filed the bar complaint against him Oct. 3. Caplan's Portland attorney, Christopher Kent, arranged the meeting in his office last Friday but demanded there be no questions about Caplan's mysterious client. Kent allowed no recording of the interview, and Caplan refused to be photographed.

Nervous, with a baby face and closely cropped goatee, Caplan says his life is now in ruins. He fears for his safety and that of his family, his clients and his two law partners. He says his office has been stormed by protesters at least three times and TV crews twice, though he did not contact police to report the incidents.

The bar investigation hasn't determined yet that there's enough evidence to prosecute. But if it decides there is enough evidence and finds wrongdoing, penalties could range from public reprimand to disbarment.

Caplan told the bar he had reason to believe Bayard was a real person, but that attorney-client privilege prevents him saying anything more, including how they met—something the bar demands to know. He says that, in his dream world, "the bar comes out with a ruling of no wrongdoing, and I can just go back to practicing law and doing what I love to do."

A self-described "boring guy," Caplan says he has no history with the CIA or any other spy agency. Born and raised in the Portland area, where his family belonged to the prestigious Multnomah Athletic Club, Caplan is a registered Democrat with no military training and no criminal record. He says he opposes torture.

Asked if he was duped by the CIA, Caplan didn't answer. Instead, he looked me in the eye, gave a wan smile, raised his hands and shrugged his shoulders. I took that as a yes.

Munk doesn't buy it. "He doesn't act like an innocent person," Munk says. "He acts like he's covering for the CIA."

Munk says he's pursuing the case to publicize the CIA program and stop the use of torture.

And Munk adds that Caplan should have split with Bayard two years ago, when it became clear his client was a fake. "The CIA may even have a contract with him that prohibits him from revealing the kind of information that the bar is trying to get," Munk says.













icon Story continues below

advertisement
OMSI
advertisement

In November 2004, the CIA had a problem. Reporters in Europe were publishing details of the agency's secret program to take terror suspects it captured in Europe, Africa, Central Asia and the Middle East to countries where torture wasn't outlawed. The reporters had hard information, including flight logs and airplane tail numbers.

Days after the story broke, an obscure Portland company called Bayard Foreign Marketing LLC bought one of the program's busiest planes from a company in Dedham, Mass., that reporters determined was a CIA front. The tail number of the Gulfstream V executive jet was changed, but it continued to make flights to countries like Egypt and Iraq after Bayard bought it.

The company's mailing address was the Portland office of Scott Caplan, who had filed the firm's articles of incorporation with the state the year before. Caplan says he charges $100 to $150 for that service.

It wasn't the first time the CIA has turned to Oregon firms to do its dirty work. McMinnville-based Evergreen International Aviation Inc. has long-standing ties to the agency and was used to fly the Shah of Iran out of Panama in 1980 when he faced extradition.

Moving terror suspects to secret prisons—dubbed "extraordinary rendition" by the Bush administration—was a complex operation that reporters and human rights workers say used a small fleet of civilian planes owned by CIA shell companies. Each company needed a registered agent in its home state to accept legal notices and file paperwork.

The CIA relied on local lawyers around the country for that job, says A.C. Thompson, co-author of the 2006 book Torture Taxi: On the Trail of the CIA's Rendition Flights. He says somebody like Caplan fits the profile the CIA was looking for—low-profile lawyers from second-tier cities.

Some lawyers used by the CIA had ties to Washington and clearly knew who they were working for, says Thompson. For others, like Caplan, he says the connection is less clear. Caplan is the registered agent for 252 companies in Oregon, according to public records.

"He could have been caught up in it and not even know," Thompson says. "With someone who's doing tons of these, they may be acting as a sort of mill for people to create and maintain companies that are totally legitimate."

Most lawyers don't check clients' backgrounds if they simply want to set up a company, said Peter Jarvis, a Portland lawyer with expertise on legal ethics. He says Caplan was negligent only if he knowingly lied for his client or broke the law.

Five of Caplan's clients and two fellow lawyers contacted for this story gave him high marks as a lawyer and said they were surprised to hear he was involved in the Bayard mess.

"When I read the story, I thought, God, that seems weird," says John Kingery, an investment manager from Bend who uses Caplan as an authorized agent for several companies. "He just never struck me as a big wheeler-dealer."

Doug Blizzard, owner of Blizzard Motors in downtown Portland and a Caplan client for 10 years, calls him "one of those Norman Rockwell family types" and says there's no way he would knowingly get involved with the CIA.

"Let's say somebody we don't know walks in, [and] I sell a car to a terrorist," Blizzard says. "How the hell am I supposed to know?"

Rate This Story
4.4 average/10 votes

Comment on this article

dan maher  writes on Feb 21st, 2007 10:52am

If the issue is about how we deal with terrorists, then I see nothing wrong. The nation is in a long term battle with homicidal muslim zealots, a battle in which anything goes. Bleeding hearts are easy to have, when it is not recognized that much of the blood can be that of a neighbors. Mr. Munk should spend some energy on something worthwhile such as the plight of the elderly in our nursing homes, a commendable project for someone like him that has plenty of time to meddle. As far as terrorists are concerned my feeling is send them where they can be done the most harm.

dan maher

KISS  writes on Feb 22nd, 2007 6:27am

Being easily duped can be a legitimate excuse...the CIA is very good at it. Anyone remember Air America and Governor Clinton of Arkansas? Mr Maher is one of those that scares the hell out of me...the " Kill "em all, and let God sort "em out "mentality. Somewhere lurking in the back ground is Chenney and his ilk. This why impeachment is so necessary, why are the dimmos dragging their feet? Oh damn, I forgot, they are good Christians too.

Tom  writes on Feb 22nd, 2007 12:02pm

Who is Michael Monk? He can tell when people are "innocent" and he is a "retired proffesor"? I would bet my house he is an activist. Guilty before tried, a favorite of extremists both left and right.

ks  writes on Feb 22nd, 2007 2:25pm

dan maher; The issue is not about how we deal with terrorists. It's about an agency of our government commiting a felony and using a private citizen to evade prosection for it. The war on terror isn't about red vs blue but about the rule of law vs the rule of intimidation and fear. In that war extraordinary rendition is a weapon of the enemy.

dan maher  writes on Feb 25th, 2007 12:30pm

ks, tell that one to the jihadists, or talibanistas whose perverted views on the Koran have led them into an all out war on the U.S., in addition to waging an all out war on civilized nations. Intimidation and Fear? Our nation commiting a felony? Woe, woe, woe. I still remember the hijacked planes that killed many of our neighbors; I don't think that we meet these people with Marquis of Queensbury rules, if we try to do so, then we lose.

dan maher

Spartacus  writes on Feb 26th, 2007 4:13pm

At the risk of sounding anti-nationlist I have to say that we are very good at being professional terrorists. Our govt. uses citizens and the name of the American people to run secret operations. Whether it is this instance or hundreds of others in the middle east and beyond. And to what exposure? shouldn't american citizens have full disclosure on the happening of our govt. and where our money is being spent. If our govt. is truly performing these acts as stated we have much more to be worried about than far off terrorists. What about here at home?

FOIA Gras  writes on Mar 3rd, 2007 12:25am

Tom, "Guilty before tried," to borrow your words, would aptly describe those subjected to the CIA's policy of extraordinary rendition, not to mention other recorded atrocities at the hands of our countrymen in Afghanistan, Gitmo, and Iraq. It is utter folly to believe that we can flout the very principles that we claim to be defending in our so-called war on terror. It's akin to one selling one's own soul in order to save it. To believe that the Bush Administration has appropriately or effectively (let alone legally or ethically) responded to 9/11 requires abject selective attention to the events that have followed.

Carson  writes on Mar 5th, 2007 10:06pm

It's Munk, not Monk. Re-read, Tom Pahlke. Then, remember that Michael Munk is not an attorney. He is not trying Caplan. Munk filed a complaint. It's out of his hands. Whatever the bar chooses to do at this point is their decision. Not Munk's. I don't think we should point directions (left, right) when someone as admirable as Michael Munk points out something wrong in a system most of us are too ignorant to observe. He's only trying to alert us that the CIA may be covering up something. Leave the nursing homes to the orderlies. Munk is an activist to be looked up to. His book, "The Portland Red Guide," due out in May, will present Portland with untold stories of our radical past.

Comment on the "North By Northwest" article



Recently in Willamette Week
July 5th 2008Manhunter | Almost every state lets bounty hunters chase down its most wanted. Why doesn’t Oregon?
July 5th 2008Get Wet: WW’s Summer Guide 2008 | The rain is finally over. Now let’s get wet!
July 5th 2008New Kids In The Flock | Gresham’s twin teenage sensations go about their Father’s business. And it’s making them superstars.
July 5th 2008The Price is WHAT? | Second-guessing City Hall—it’s more fun than Monopoly!
July 5th 2008Welcome to Googleville | America’s newest information superhighway begins On Oregon’s Silicon Prairie.
July 5th 2008Fleeced | While students across Oregon celebrate graduation, many are facing a gnawing problem—they’re getting sheared by huge debt.
July 5th 2008A Bridge Over The River Why? | Local pols say global warming is a dire threat. But they want to spend $4.2 billion on a project that makes driving easier.
July 5th 2008Higher Ed | Reed College is exceptional for more than academics. It’s one of America’s most permissive colleges for experimenting with drugs.
July 5th 2008Best New Band 2008 | Portland music insiders take our local scene to the chopping block—and come out with 10 new faves.
July 5th 2008For The Love of Politics | WW’s endorsement page-turner has all the candidates worth falling for this election.