Logo
ISSUE #33.21 • NEWS • NEWS STORY

Hot gas blues


Oregon joins a nationwide consumer revolt against Big Oil.

Recently in "News"

November 25th, 2009
Murmurs • Our Reporting, Our Words.0 comments

November 25th, 2009
Dr. Know0 comments

November 25th, 2009
Letters to the Editor • Inbox0 comments

November 25th, 2009
Lost A Space | The new cannabis cafe’s neighbors are ticked. But not about the pot.0 comments

November 25th, 2009
Contract Killers | What’s holding up a deal between Portland Public Schools and teachers?0 comments

November 25th, 2009
Reasonable Doubts | Five Portlanders take the police union’s beanbag-video challenge.0 comments

November 25th, 2009
A Donor By Any Other Name | Corporate interests use associations to pass money to Oregon’s anti-tax campaign.0 comments

November 25th, 2009
Cover Story • Trail Mix | This holiday weekend, give thanks for your other family: The Blazers.0 comments

November 25th, 2009
Ask the Editor • What Were We Thinking? | WW Editor Mark Zusman answers your questions about our coverage.0 comments

November 18th, 2009
Murmurs • Going Rogue Each Week4 comments



IMAGE: Chad Crowe
BY JAMES PITKIN | jpitkin at wweek dot com

[April 4th, 2007] Wipe that springtime smile off your face. Warm weather may bring out T-shirts and sandals, but it also may mean you're getting screwed at the gas pump.

With Big Oil's reputation lower than dirt, consumer groups are calling foul on a scam they say has gone on for decades. And a lawsuit filed March 9 in U.S. District Court in Portland is plunging Oregonians into the fray.

Mark Haben, a long-haul trucker from Keizer, is suing Chevron USA Inc. and Tesoro Refining and Marketing Co. for failing to adjust measurements of fuel those two companies sell at the pump for fuel-temperature variations. The alleged cost of this practice to Oregon motorists: an estimated $10 million a year in extra cash spent on gas.

The class-action lawsuit could eventually include everyone who buys gasoline, depending on whether judges allow the case to move forward and how big a slice of the public they decide to let in on the action.

The science behind the debate is simple. When a liquid gets hot, the molecules move apart and it expands, so the same amount takes up more volume. When gasoline is sold at higher temperatures, you're actually getting less fuel in your tank—and less energy to burn—per gallon.

The per-gallon difference is tiny, but it adds up fast. That's why almost 100 years ago, oil companies established a standard temperature of 60 degrees. When the companies sell to each other or to gas stations, they adjust the amount based on temperature. If the fuel's hotter than 60 degrees, the buyer gets a little more; if it's colder, the buyer gets a little less.

In Canada, where gas-buying consumers would benefit from colder temperatures, gas pumps adjust the amount they dispense based on the fuel's temperature. But down south in the United States, where the average temperature of fuel sold is 64.7 degrees, pumps don't adjust—benefiting the oil companies. Drivers get nicked buying the warmer gas—more than $1.7 billion a year nationwide, according to consumer groups.

"Consumers get hammered because the oil companies have put the kibosh on fair prices," says Doug Heller, executive director of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights in Santa Monica, Calif. "We're just asking them to apply the same fair standard that they apply at the wholesale level."














icon Story continues below

advertisement

advertisement

Truckers have long grumbled about the practice, but they gained no traction until the Kansas City Star ran a series of articles on so-called "hot fuel" starting last August. Since then, 28 lawsuits have been filed in 17 states, including Haben's in Oregon, where the weather is warm enough to make consumers a loser.

The Star investigation used gas-tank temperatures nationwide to estimate the net gain or loss to customers in each state. Some cold states actually come out ahead, but overall the nation takes a loss. The $10 million estimate in temperate Oregon is in the middle of the road, modest compared with $509 million a year in California.

Haben says he answered an email early this year from the Owner-Operator Independent Driver Association in Grain Valley, Mo., recruiting truckers to get involved in hot-fuel lawsuits. He didn't know much about the issue then, and still doesn't. He told WW he had no idea he was the only plaintiff in the Oregon lawsuit, and said he'd been neglecting to file paperwork requested by lawyers.

"It's been way on the back burner, 'cause I've been way skeptical about the whole thing," Haben says. He says he told lawyers he buys most of his gas at Chevron and Tesoro, which is why those companies are named in the lawsuit.

A spokeswoman for Tesoro in San Antonio, Texas, declined to comment. Chevron corporate headquarters in San Ramon, Calif., didn't return a phone call seeking comment.

Haben's Portland attorney, Linda Williams—whom Haben says he's never met—says the lawsuit and others like it around the country will almost certainly be folded into one case, before a court that's yet to be determined. Big class-action cases generally take two to three years to litigate, she says.

Guy Calladine, a San Francisco lawyer who filed the first two hot-fuel lawsuits in December, says if the plaintiffs win, the payoff could come in the form of a court-ordered rollback of gas prices nationwide. Lawyers are also asking that pumps be retrofitted to adjust for temperature, he says. He calls hot fuel a "dirty little secret that the industry knew about forever."

Rate This Story
2.8 average/20 votes

 
read all 13 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “Hot gas blues”

10

Is New York part of the lawsuit?

peter bradley, Jun 20th, 2007 6:22pm
11

All comments are good and can save $.

but the price is still the problum.

les. moore., Aug 10th, 2007 8:32am
12

I THINK THAT ALL AMERICANS SHOULD WRITE THIER STATE GOV. AND DEMAND THAT THEY GET ON BOARD AND GO TO WASHINGTON AND DEMAND THAT ACTION BE TAKEN TO LOWER THE PRICES OF OIL BACK DOWN , THERE IS NO REASO...

r. westbrook, Nov 7th, 2007 7:28pm
13

Mark...if you ever read this email me. Can't believe your trucking again. LOL

Kristina, Feb 13th, 2009 1:09pm
 
 
 





Recently in Willamette Week
December 31st 1969Washington State | The Canada of Oregon has it all—a Stonehenge replica, a longboarder's concrete wet dream and dark, damp underground lava caves. Vive les rocks.
December 31st 1969Oregon's Outer Edges | Crater Lake. Hell's Canyon. Wallowa and Steens mountain ranges. Hell, yeah.
December 31st 1969Central Oregon/High Desert | No rain, plenty of snow, obsidian flows and great local beer. The folks from the real eastside know how to unbend outside.
December 31st 1969Great Cascades/Columbia Gorge | With plenty of room to roam—and hot springs for your weary feet—it's the place to ramble and relax for the weekend.
December 31st 1969Willamette Valley | Monks, tracks, tubing and wine make the fertile strip a virile place to play.
December 31st 1969Stumptown | Tons of public parks, an extinct volcano and nude beach volleyball to keep you jolly. Get out and collect those merit badges, without leaving the city.
December 31st 1969The Coast | The beaches are public. You own them. Go play—hike in the old-growth forests.
December 31st 1969Cycle Tour 101: Your on-bike guide to Highway 101 | To ride the greatest bike route in Oregon, you need to get out of Portland.
December 31st 1969Doggin' It | What happens when a Portland running club jogs with pooches from the pound?
December 31st 1969Over the Edge | Sam Drevo will paddle yr ass.