Logo
ISSUE #33.22 • NEWS • COLUMN
Rogue of the Week

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Social bookmarking | Permalink
Email | Print | Rate It! | 4 comments
Recently in "Rogue of the Week"

January 7th, 2009
Barack Obama | Partying on our last dime15 comments

December 24th, 2008
Willamette Week | Man, we screwed up.15 comments

December 17th, 2008
Chris Sundstrom | Such a sweetheart deal.4 comments

December 10th, 2008
Oregon Rail Holiday Express | So much for holiday spirit.56 comments

December 3rd, 2008
TMT Development | Bully in a bar fight.7 comments

November 26th, 2008
Associated Creditors Exchange | Chasing a debt to the ends of the Earth.7 comments

November 19th, 2008
Butch Miller | Un-fare play.18 comments

November 12th, 2008
Rainbow Adult Living | Busted!34 comments

November 5th, 2008
Steve Blake and Ike Diogu | Two Blazers blow a layup.21 comments

October 29th, 2008
Oregon Public Utility Commission | A little transparency, please.2 comments


BY WW EDITORIAL STAFF | 503-243-2122

[April 11th, 2007] Who cares about a tiny minnow that lives in puddles, stagnant marshes and beaver ponds?

According to scientists at the Institute for Wildlife in Eugene, you should. And they've even provided a Rogue to blame, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which the institute says is breaking the law by failing to protect the skinny minnows.

Oddly known as the Oregon chub (Oregonichthys crameri), the minnow has been listed under the Endangered Species Act since 1993. But according to a lawsuit filed March 9 in U.S. District Court in Portland, the feds have failed to take steps required by that law to save them.

The lawsuit filed by the Eugene-based nonprofit asks the court to order Fish and Wildlife to establish critical habitat for the fish, and to begin five-year reviews on efforts to save them—safeguards required under the Endangered Species Act.

The chub doesn't have the sex appeal of the salmon, baby harp seal, grizzly bear or bald eagle. But all species are worth saving, says Randy Webb, senior ecologist at the Institute for Wildlife. "Just because humans don't really care about it," Webb says, "does that mean we should get rid of it?"













icon Story continues below

advertisement

advertisement

According to Webb, it's important to establish the critical habitat, because then landowners can't damage it. Sand and gravel pits, sewage plants and road projects would be the biggest losers, he says.

Joan Jewett, spokeswoman for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Portland office, says the agency hasn't designated critical habitat for the chub because it couldn't be determined. The five-year plans were dropped "due to the press of other business," but one is planned for this year, she says.

The chub is "doing very well," Jewett says, and is close to being upgraded from "endangered" to "threatened." But Webb says that's beside the point because the law says the chub should be getting the protections of an endangered species.

And the Rogue desk agrees. "The idea is that these things need to be recovered," Webb says. "And that is not happening."

Rate This Story
3 average/2 votes

 
read all 4 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service”

1

Because i actually work for the Service, i can see right through this- this article is totally irresponsible and careless reporting.

One thing you are correct on: Yes, the Service ...

lasognatore, Apr 11th, 2007 4:11pm
2

Hey since you are all into protecting endangered species how about we send you a few of our rock star status biologist which have well trained and habitualized Mexican Gray Wolves? After all they are...

B, Apr 11th, 2007 8:24pm
3

As a professional fish biologist who has worked with Oregon Chub for over a decade, I would like to respond to the “Rogue of the Week” column regarding protection of Oregon chub under the Endangered S...

Paul Scheerer, Apr 12th, 2007 12:03pm
4

"More than $750,000 has been spent for monitoring and recovery since the chub was listed under the ESA."

Your tax dollars at work. I bet a lot more than is being claimed has been s...

BeenBitten, Apr 14th, 2007 10:30pm
 
 
 





Recently in Willamette Week
December 31st 1969Washington State | The Canada of Oregon has it all—a Stonehenge replica, a longboarder's concrete wet dream and dark, damp underground lava caves. Vive les rocks.
December 31st 1969Oregon's Outer Edges | Crater Lake. Hell's Canyon. Wallowa and Steens mountain ranges. Hell, yeah.
December 31st 1969Central Oregon/High Desert | No rain, plenty of snow, obsidian flows and great local beer. The folks from the real eastside know how to unbend outside.
December 31st 1969Great Cascades/Columbia Gorge | With plenty of room to roam—and hot springs for your weary feet—it's the place to ramble and relax for the weekend.
December 31st 1969Willamette Valley | Monks, tracks, tubing and wine make the fertile strip a virile place to play.
December 31st 1969Stumptown | Tons of public parks, an extinct volcano and nude beach volleyball to keep you jolly. Get out and collect those merit badges, without leaving the city.
December 31st 1969The Coast | The beaches are public. You own them. Go play—hike in the old-growth forests.
December 31st 1969Cycle Tour 101: Your on-bike guide to Highway 101 | To ride the greatest bike route in Oregon, you need to get out of Portland.
December 31st 1969Doggin' It | What happens when a Portland running club jogs with pooches from the pound?
December 31st 1969Over the Edge | Sam Drevo will paddle yr ass.