Logo
ISSUE #33.23 • NEWS • COLUMN
[ROGUE OF THE WEEK]

Basic Rights Oregon and Rep. Tina Kotek

Recently in "Rogue of the Week"

June 10th, 2009
Brandon Caselman | An insurance agent who lost his license over his million-dollar “advice.”11 comments

June 3rd, 2009
Karla Keller | Worse than parking tickets: Drinking and driving.28 comments

May 27th, 2009
Ken Allen, Dan Clay, Tom Chamberlain | Look for the union label.20 comments

May 20th, 2009
Ed Kraus | Oy vey. Slapping down an open hand.3 comments

May 6th, 2009
Bakke Properties | Who’s the real vermin?6 comments

April 29th, 2009
Laurie Monnes Anderson | Wrong time to kill a watchdog.5 comments

April 22nd, 2009
Mayor Sam Adams | One deal too many.26 comments

April 15th, 2009
Portland Revenue Bureau | A wheel pain for local business.0 comments

April 8th, 2009
12 Lanes | We like these signs of dissent.6 comments

April 1st, 2009
Rev. E. William Beauchamp | Censorship isn’t a Christian value.10 comments


Tina Kotek (left) with her "domestic partner," Aimee Wilson
IMAGE: Byron Beck
BY BYRON BECK AND HENRY STERN | bbeck at wweek dot com and hstern at wweek dot com

[April 18th, 2007] The Rogue desk would love to join Basic Rights Oregon in celebrating the House's passage of House Bill 2007 on Tuesday.

The bill, which would give gay couples similar rights to those of married hetero couples, and Senate Bill 2, which would bar discrimination against gays, are the principal goals this session of BRO, the state's leading gay-rights lobby.

But pardon us if we don't join BRO and its legislative partner, Rep. Tina Kotek (D-North Portland), when they pop the bubbly at the group's annual business leaders luncheon on April 18.

Why? Because they succumbed to poll-driven pressure to change language in HB 2007 that, in our minds, was just fine the way it was.

Five weeks ago, HB 2007 was a civil unions bill. But last week Kotek amended the bill to use the more poll-proven domestic partnership, borrowing a phrase from our neighbors to the south (California) and north (Washington passed it last week). New Jersey, Connecticut and Vermont call their same-sex couples civil unions.

"No matter what we call it, the reality is that we are getting a package of rights we've never had before,'' says Aisling Coghlan, BRO's interim executive director. "It's a historic victory that will change the lives of thousands of Oregon families."

Rebekah Orr, communications director for the House Democratic Majority, strongly agrees that the name change doesn't matter since the bill's effect remains the same and that name-change critics totally miss the point. At the same time, Orr, a former communications director for BRO, and others insist HB 2007 would have passed the Legislature if it carried the original civil-unions label.

So if the contents of the bill are the same and it would have passed anyway, why change the term? Here's a clue: A statewide poll taken in February showed 41 percent of respondents would vote to repeal a change in same-sex law if the change was termed a civil union, versus 23 percent if it was phrased as a domestic partnership.














icon Story continues below

advertisement

advertisement

Kotek, who's a lesbian, wrote supporters that "it has become increasingly clear to me that the language of 'Domestic Partnerships' is far more understandable than 'civil unions,' which is a relatively new term...while the term 'Domestic Partner' has been around a long time."

But extend the "what's in a name" logic for a second to when Congress passed the Civil Rights Acts in 1957 and 1964. How about if lawmakers had still given African-Americans their long-denied rights but called them "middle of the bus" bills, so Southerners could sleep easier believing the legislation didn't really do anything for civil rights.

And just imagine the "gay bait-and-switch" campaign ads in Oregon from gay-rights opponents next year, when they'll get to say bill backers swapped the language.

Senate Majority Leader Kate Brown (D-Portland) was asked specifically about a civil unions bill in a Q&A with WW that ran on March 7. Brown said then, "I think there are the votes in the Legislature" for that, and that the measure would come up in April. Brown this week echoed other bill supporters, saying "it doesn't matter what you call this" because the bill is a good one.

Well, it does matter. And the Rogue desk isn't alone in being pissed off in its gut about the change.

Portland City Commissioner Sam Adams, who's openly gay, says he'll defer to BRO on the political strategy but adds, "My human reaction is, it's very disappointing."

Rate This Story
1.29 average/329 votes

 
read all 43 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “Basic Rights Oregon and Rep. Tina Kotek”

40

I admit, my immediate reaction was, why are they changing the language? But after it was explained and the evidence was provided to me, I just fail to see how this name change is worthy of a 'rogue' ...

JustinGraig, Apr 25th, 2007 3:58pm
41

When same-sex marriages were allowed in Multnomah County, I stood in front of the couples with a sign of congratulations and next to a Bible thumping screamer who was opposed to the unions. For forty-...

Nelson L. Jones, Apr 26th, 2007 9:17pm
42

I think we are too quick to assume there is no real and substanative difference between the implications of the term,"domestic partnership" as opposed to "civil union".

"Domestic" i...

Kim Barigar, Apr 30th, 2007 11:28am
43

It seems to me Oregonians have decided marriage is a religious issue, so the real action should be to build the wall higher between church and state, and get government out of the marriage business. ...

Robert G. Gourley, Jun 27th, 2007 9:03am
 
 
 





Music Millennium
Ad

Ad

Ad

Sponsored Links: WW Personals
Musician's Market
Snowboard Jackets
Legal Tips


Recently in Willamette Week
December 31st 1969Washington State | The Canada of Oregon has it all—a Stonehenge replica, a longboarder's concrete wet dream and dark, damp underground lava caves. Vive les rocks.
December 31st 1969Oregon's Outer Edges | Crater Lake. Hell's Canyon. Wallowa and Steens mountain ranges. Hell, yeah.
December 31st 1969Central Oregon/High Desert | No rain, plenty of snow, obsidian flows and great local beer. The folks from the real eastside know how to unbend outside.
December 31st 1969Great Cascades/Columbia Gorge | With plenty of room to roam—and hot springs for your weary feet—it's the place to ramble and relax for the weekend.
December 31st 1969Willamette Valley | Monks, tracks, tubing and wine make the fertile strip a virile place to play.
December 31st 1969Stumptown | Tons of public parks, an extinct volcano and nude beach volleyball to keep you jolly. Get out and collect those merit badges, without leaving the city.
December 31st 1969The Coast | The beaches are public. You own them. Go play—hike in the old-growth forests.
December 31st 1969Cycle Tour 101: Your on-bike guide to Highway 101 | To ride the greatest bike route in Oregon, you need to get out of Portland.
December 31st 1969Doggin' It | What happens when a Portland running club jogs with pooches from the pound?
December 31st 1969Over the Edge | Sam Drevo will paddle yr ass.