Logo
ISSUE #33.25 • NEWS • FEEDBACK
Letters to the Editor

Mailbox

Social bookmarking | Permalink
Email | Print | Rate It! | 4 comments
Recently in "Letters to the Editor"

January 7th, 2009
Inbox0 comments

December 31st, 2008
Inbox1 comment

December 24th, 2008
Inbox0 comments

December 17th, 2008
Inbox6 comments

December 10th, 2008
Inbox1 comment

December 3rd, 2008
Inbox0 comments

November 26th, 2008
Inbox1 comment

November 19th, 2008
Inbox1 comment

November 12th, 2008
Inbox7 comments

November 5th, 2008
Inbox8 comments

BY WW EDITORIAL STAFF | 503-243-2122

[May 2nd, 2007] LESS SIMON, MORE PAULA

As an actor and artist in this city, I have been outraged by the reviews of Aaron Mesh for Punk Love [WW, April 11] and Stephen Marc Beaudoin for Grease [March 7]. These were personal attacks, not constructive and insightful critiques. These reviewers did their best "Simon Cowell" and basically put down the artists involved. Is this paper trying to drive all artists out of Portland? This is not American Idol, and this "Cruel Criticism for Entertainment" needs to STOP! The contestants on American Idol know what they're in for. It is a show for entertainment and that kind of criticism is part of it. But in the real world, artists are putting themselves and their art out there for honest criticism.

Take Punk Love, for example. If Mr. Mesh had done any research at all, he would have seen that is was a darn good second try by a young local filmmaker. It was shot with one DV camera, and Nick Lyon did all of the editing and post work by himself on his computer. He admits the story is weak, and would not do it again. But there was a lot great with the film, especially with the budget constraints. Visuals were artistic, gritty. The acting was gutsy and strong, and the editing made this film far above other local low-budget films.

When Mr. Beaudoin said Corey Brunish had "zero sex appeal" as Danny, what kind of critique is that? How can an artist learn from that? The mean-spirited criticisms may be humorous, along with the new violence in commercials à la "Trunk Monkey," but they should not be used in this way. It's irresponsible, and also "sophomoric," to use Mr. Mesh's word. My question to all of you, is there no responsible, experienced editorial staff at this paper?












icon Story continues below

advertisement

advertisement

Sherilyn Lawson

Via wweek.com

HABITAT FOR INANITY

WW's recent section on home-buying [Habitat, April 11, 2007] opens with the assertion that prospective buyers shouldn't worry about the market but should just "take action" and jump in, even if they can't even muster much of a down payment, because the general trend in prices is an "overwhelming" up. Perhaps since you are urging your readers to bank their financial future on this, you could also have mentioned that even though the job market is raging, interest rates are rock-bottom, and pretty much anyone with a pulse has been able to get a mortgage, the median price for a U.S. home actually declined over the past year, which is unprecedented in recent history.

Given that lending standards are now being tightened thanks to a rash of irresponsible loans that are producing defaults and foreclosures, and that inventories of unsold homes are steadily increasing, why would we expect that housing prices are nothing but an "elevator" that keeps rising? Could it be that WW is unduly influenced by the mortgage brokers and Realtors whose advertising graces the space throughout your home-buying guide? Nah, that would be downright roguish.

David Graves

Southeast 13th Avenue

Rate This Story
5 average/2 votes

 
read all 4 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “Mailbox”

1

Hey, Sherilyn, when I go to a movie, I don't do any research either. I don't care what the movie was shot with, how it was edited, or how much it cost. If it's a good movie, it's a good movie. And if ...

Tom, May 3rd, 2007 4:32pm
2

Then there are those film makers who bastardize the facts then present their rewritten version of history in documentary format with mind numbing editing to create moments in history that never occurr...

el rey , May 4th, 2007 3:46am
3

"ctr nd rtst", hh?

Mthnks smll Strbcks mply...wth lbrl rts dgr.

troll, May 8th, 2007 3:54pm
4

oh chris, you are soooo wrong. but entitled to your opinion too. it's not bad reviews i was criticizing, but the mean spirited direction they are taking for entertainment value.

sherilyn, May 9th, 2007 1:56pm
 
 
 





Recently in Willamette Week
December 31st 1969Washington State | The Canada of Oregon has it all—a Stonehenge replica, a longboarder's concrete wet dream and dark, damp underground lava caves. Vive les rocks.
December 31st 1969Oregon's Outer Edges | Crater Lake. Hell's Canyon. Wallowa and Steens mountain ranges. Hell, yeah.
December 31st 1969Central Oregon/High Desert | No rain, plenty of snow, obsidian flows and great local beer. The folks from the real eastside know how to unbend outside.
December 31st 1969Great Cascades/Columbia Gorge | With plenty of room to roam—and hot springs for your weary feet—it's the place to ramble and relax for the weekend.
December 31st 1969Willamette Valley | Monks, tracks, tubing and wine make the fertile strip a virile place to play.
December 31st 1969Stumptown | Tons of public parks, an extinct volcano and nude beach volleyball to keep you jolly. Get out and collect those merit badges, without leaving the city.
December 31st 1969The Coast | The beaches are public. You own them. Go play—hike in the old-growth forests.
December 31st 1969Cycle Tour 101: Your on-bike guide to Highway 101 | To ride the greatest bike route in Oregon, you need to get out of Portland.
December 31st 1969Doggin' It | What happens when a Portland running club jogs with pooches from the pound?
December 31st 1969Over the Edge | Sam Drevo will paddle yr ass.