Shields up
How will the Northwest’s federal lawmakers vote on protecting reporters’ notes?
January 7th, 2009
Murmurs • Amid The Challenges, A Commitment To Show Up.0 comments
January 7th, 2009
Hot Air | An Oregon chemist tends the fires of global-warming deniers.1 comment
January 7th, 2009
Rogue of the Week • Barack Obama | Partying on our last dime18 comments
January 7th, 2009
Mobile Sten | What’s the man who was City Hall’s biggest deal maker doing in Bend?0 comments
January 7th, 2009
The Weekly Fix • Just Like Starting Over0 comments
January 7th, 2009
Cover Story • Jody De Simone Wants To Kick Your Ass | A Pearl District PR woman takes a “crash course” in mixed martial arts.39 comments
January 7th, 2009
Clearing The Smoke | More fights and outdoor urination, plus other predictions after the new smoking ban’s first week.
January 7th, 2009
The Score • Estate Of Denial | Think prosecuting elder abuse will be easy under Newly passed Measure 57? Maybe not.2 comments
January 7th, 2009
Letters to the Editor • Inbox0 comments
January 7th, 2009
Ask the Editor • What Were We Thinking? | WW Editor Mark Zusman answers your questions about our coverage.0 comments
![]() |
|
Story attachments
|
|
| Comments from the legislators | |
[May 9th, 2007] In Oregon and Washington, reporters have robust legal protections for their sources’ confidentiality along with the privacy of their notes and conversations, published or otherwise.
In Idaho, reporters got nothin’.
While Oregon is in the majority with 32 other states that give protective shields to reporters from judicial subpoenas, many in Congress want the protection to be a federal one covering all 50 states. So last week, in what’s becoming an annual rite, U.S. Rep. Rick Boucher (D-Va.) introduced the Free Flow of Information Act of 2007, which would offer some protections to journalists and their sources.
Among the six House co-sponsors of HR 2102 is Oregon’s own Rep. Greg Walden (R-Hood River), who says “coercing reporters to divulge their sources through the courts has a chilling effect on whistle-blowing and investigative reporting.... We in Congress must do everything in our power to protect the freedoms of journalistic institutions.”
Agreed. But given that similar bills were introduced in 2005 and 2006 but never made it to a floor vote, we wondered how the congressional delegation from Oregon and southwest Washington would vote.
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Shields up”
In this week's Portland Business Journal is an article that should make every reporter's blood run cold:
Less disclosure may equal more investment
Portland Busine...










