Logo
ISSUE #33.26 • NEWS • NEWS STORY

A real break


Real-estate agents want to widen an unusual tax benefit.

Recently in "News"

November 25th, 2009
Murmurs • Our Reporting, Our Words.0 comments

November 25th, 2009
Dr. Know0 comments

November 25th, 2009
Letters to the Editor • Inbox0 comments

November 25th, 2009
Lost A Space | The new cannabis cafe’s neighbors are ticked. But not about the pot.0 comments

November 25th, 2009
Contract Killers | What’s holding up a deal between Portland Public Schools and teachers?0 comments

November 25th, 2009
Reasonable Doubts | Five Portlanders take the police union’s beanbag-video challenge.0 comments

November 25th, 2009
A Donor By Any Other Name | Corporate interests use associations to pass money to Oregon’s anti-tax campaign.0 comments

November 25th, 2009
Cover Story • Trail Mix | This holiday weekend, give thanks for your other family: The Blazers.0 comments

November 25th, 2009
Ask the Editor • What Were We Thinking? | WW Editor Mark Zusman answers your questions about our coverage.0 comments

November 18th, 2009
Murmurs • Going Rogue Each Week4 comments



IMAGE: Matt Clark
BY NIGEL JAQUISS | njaquiss at wweek dot com

[May 9th, 2007] A bill introduced by the Oregon Association of Realtors to extend a local income-tax exemption to more of its members could backfire on the whole industry.

The aim of House Bill 2541 is simple: to give principal real-estate brokers the same break on local taxes, such as Portland’s business license fee, that rank-and-file real-estate brokers already enjoy.

Principal brokers are distinguished by their supervisory positions and by their “ownership” of listings, says the Realtors Association’s government affairs director, Jana Jarvis.

But the bill, now in a Senate committee after the House approved it last month, raises a more fundamental question for Portland City Commissioner Sam Adams: Why aren’t all real-estate agents paying local business taxes just like other independent contractors?

“I am searching for a legitimate reason why Realtors should be exempt from the business license fee, and other professional service providers, such as lawyers, doctors or physical therapists, should not,” Adams says.

Currently, most businesses that operate in Portland, from sole proprietorships to large corporations, pay a 2.2 percent business license fee on net business income. The fee last year generated $62 million, or about 17 percent of Portland’s discretionary general fund, according to Terri Williams, the city Revenue Bureau’s license and tax division manager.

According to the City Attorney’s office, the real-estate agents’ tax break harks back to the early 1980s, when industry lobbyists persuaded legislators to classify brokers as contractors rather than employees.














icon Story continues below

advertisement

advertisement

The city responded by charging brokers an annual license fee on net income. But in 1987, the industry took care of that by getting an exemption from the Legislature. That exemption, however, did not include principal brokers.

Real estate is a big business locally. In 2006, according to the Regional Multiple Listing Service, 13,986 properties worth more than $4.3 billion sold in Multnomah County.

The RMLS says 3,276 brokers and 420 principal brokers do business in the county. The former are already exempt from paying the city tax, which Williams says costs the city up to $250,000 annually.

Ironically, Jarvis says, the impetus for the bill doesn’t come from Portland. It comes instead from Medford, which has been trying to tax out-of-town brokers.

Nonetheless, Adams, who wrote changes this year that will reduce the BLF’s impact on some small businesses, says it’s time to examine the break for real-estate brokers.

“We spent months trying to reform the BLF last year and one of the questions that kept coming up was, why are real-estate brokers exempt?” Adams says.

Adding to the perception of inequity, Adams says, is that all real-estate brokers pay the Multnomah County business income tax, a substantially similar tax that costs nearly all companies doing business in the county 1.45 percent of their net business income.

Rate This Story
4.14 average/7 votes

 
read all 1 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “A real break”

1

Boy, I knew Realtors were DUM but this takes the cake. Waiting in the wings our spend and tax-man Adams is licking his chops. With the added revenue he can have another Tram.

KISS, May 10th, 2007 5:45am
 
 
 





Recently in Willamette Week
December 31st 1969Washington State | The Canada of Oregon has it all—a Stonehenge replica, a longboarder's concrete wet dream and dark, damp underground lava caves. Vive les rocks.
December 31st 1969Oregon's Outer Edges | Crater Lake. Hell's Canyon. Wallowa and Steens mountain ranges. Hell, yeah.
December 31st 1969Central Oregon/High Desert | No rain, plenty of snow, obsidian flows and great local beer. The folks from the real eastside know how to unbend outside.
December 31st 1969Great Cascades/Columbia Gorge | With plenty of room to roam—and hot springs for your weary feet—it's the place to ramble and relax for the weekend.
December 31st 1969Willamette Valley | Monks, tracks, tubing and wine make the fertile strip a virile place to play.
December 31st 1969Stumptown | Tons of public parks, an extinct volcano and nude beach volleyball to keep you jolly. Get out and collect those merit badges, without leaving the city.
December 31st 1969The Coast | The beaches are public. You own them. Go play—hike in the old-growth forests.
December 31st 1969Cycle Tour 101: Your on-bike guide to Highway 101 | To ride the greatest bike route in Oregon, you need to get out of Portland.
December 31st 1969Doggin' It | What happens when a Portland running club jogs with pooches from the pound?
December 31st 1969Over the Edge | Sam Drevo will paddle yr ass.