November 18th, 2009
Bureau Of Transportation | One more mouth to feed.4 comments
November 11th, 2009
Washington Co. DA’s Office | Abusing a domestic violence law.24 comments
November 4th, 2009
University Of Oregon | Who’s killing Rudolph?7 comments
October 28th, 2009
Metro | A blowhard answer to global warming? 6 comments
October 21st, 2009
Michael Ruppert | Peak trouble for an Oregon author.23 comments
October 7th, 2009
Beaverton Police | Zero tolerance for video recorders.11 comments
September 30th, 2009
Lynn Peterson | C’mon, Dems. Are Kitzhaber and Bradbury that formidable?3 comments
September 23rd, 2009
Denny Doyle | Beaverton mayor hits a foul ball.3 comments
September 2nd, 2009
Oregon Bankers Association | For bailouts, then against them.6 comments
August 19th, 2009
Wal-Mart | Save money. Live worse.9 comments
![]() Kari Chisholm |
[August 29th, 2007] The 2008 election is more than a year away, and already the machine is picking targets. Its first victim: Steve Novick, the underdog Democratic candidate who hopes to win the May primary and face Oregon’s Republican senator, Gordon Smith.
The Rogue Desk isn’t known for playing nice. We like it when politicians mix it up. But we’re calling foul on Democratic media consultant Kari Chisholm , who runs the blog BlueOregon.com, for excessive use of bullshit in his mud-slinging.
This week, Chisholm accused Novick of buying into the Republican “swiftboating” of Jeff Merkley, Oregon’s House Speaker and Smith’s more established challenger.
So guess who Chisholm’s backing? Here’s a hint: He’s not Republican, and he has 10 fingers.
Novick’s supposed crime? The candidate with no left hand criticized Merkley for voting in favor of a March 2003 resolution in the Oregon Legislature acknowledging “the courage of President George W. Bush, the President’s cabinet and the men and women of the Armed Forces of the United States,” and expressing “support for the victorious removal of Saddam Hussein from power.”
Merkley’s people are calling House Resolution 2 a “support the troops” measure. Sounds pretty pro-war to us.
Chisholm was also cheesed that Novick had pointed out that Democratic voters are demoralized because “they feel their leaders have missed opportunities…to take a strong stand against the war.”
This rather obvious remark, said Chisholm, was an attack on Merkley and “a clear parroting of the Republican line.”
It took the Rogue Desk a minute to untangle Chisholm’s argument. It amounts to this: Criticizing Democrats who cowered before the bogus arguments of warmongering Republicans makes you…almost as bad as a warmongering Republican.
In other words, if you ain’t with us, you must be against us.
Chisholm defends Merkley’s role on the grounds that legislative rules prevented him from abstaining. Novick “was never put
in this box,” Chisholm says.
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Kari Chisholm”
Darn. I never get any e-mails from Kari. I feel cheated. By the way, CONGRATULATIONS KARI on making Rogue of the Week! WAHOO!
Charlie, aren't you supposed to be one of the Editor's of Blue0? 'Cause your Chief Cook and Salad Spinner is saying just the opposite now. When he caught caught this week in what would generously be c...
it seems like Kari & mandate media have a monopoly on democratic candidates running for office and their websites... who else does websites for candidates?
BlueOregon has been bullying people who don't agree with the editorial slant for too long. I am glad WWeek has finally called them out on it! I stopped reading BlueOregon a long time ago and recomme...













