Lowball Landscaping
Prison can be a walk in the park.
May 7th, 2008
Cover Story • Best New Band 2008 | Portland music insiders take our local scene to the chopping block—and come out with 10 new faves. 0 comments
May 7th, 2008
Holy Smoke | High times for marijuana marchers.9 comments
May 7th, 2008
Trib Translation | An annotation of last week’s news about the news.9 comments
May 7th, 2008
Murmurs • Where We Gather Each Week To See How We Live.4 comments
May 7th, 2008
Rogue of the Week • Elaine Franklin | Thy name is mud-slinging.1 comment
May 7th, 2008
Honor Thy Neighbor | But covet your own U.S. Senate candidate.0 comments
May 7th, 2008
Quick Picks for the Primary | A WW endorsements cheat sheet for your vote-by-mail ballot.2 comments
May 7th, 2008
Pop Quiz • What do you see in the picture? | WW’s weekly election feature—designed to scare the hell out of City Hall candidates.0 comments
May 7th, 2008
Getting In Gear | Can 5,000 cyclists swing a City Hall election?0 comments
May 7th, 2008
The Big Dump | A Sauvie Island resident’s fight to prevent an isle of blight.3 comments
![]() union official Richard “Buz” Beetle: These leaves don’t pick themselves up. Increasingly, prisoners do. IMAGE: chrisryanphoto.com |
[November 28th, 2007]
Picking up wet leaves in the cold for 5 cents an hour is an opportunity to “develop appropriate work habits,” according to the Oregon Department of Corrections and Portland Parks and Recreation.
It’s also an opportunity for Portland Parks to save $387 a day by hiring state prisoners to do work that city union officials say should be done by its full-time employees.
“Any way they can figure out how to lowball people, they’re gonna do it,” says Richard “Buz” Beetle, business manager for Laborers’ Local 483, which represents about 150 parks workers. “We’re slowly eroding the difference between us and China.”
On Nov. 21, the City Council voted unanimously to approve a two-year, $180,000 contract with the state prisons department. The contract, which provides the city with inmate work crews from the minimum-security Columbia River Correctional Institution in Northeast Portland, formalizes an on-the-fly arrangement that dates back at least six years. But city managers never told union leadership that state prisoners would be sharing the workload, and shop stewards never complained.
Bob Downing, a Portland Parks manager, says there was no intention to “short-circuit” the unions. Rather, he says, the city was guilty of a “communication flub.”
Beetle brought his concerns to the council on Nov. 14, after WW asked for his take on the inmate work contract he didn’t know about. Beetle’s “heartburn” delayed passage of the contract by a week—which in turn delayed the annual leaf pickup in the city’s 180-plus parks.
So, if you’re upset about soggy autumn leaves decomposing in your neighborhood park, blame WW . “Why do you have to read our agenda so closely?” joked Commissioner Dan Saltzman, who oversees the parks bureau.
Saltzman argued that having strapping young criminals do the heavy lifting saved older full-time parks employees from potential injury.
“That wasn’t very heartwarming,” says Beetle, a 30-year city employee.
Parks director Zari Santner wrote Beetle that the department does not intend to “supplant” employees with inmate workers, but rather to “supplement” them.
advertisement
The union wants the city to confine the inmates to unskilled, “pick and shovel”-type work. In addition to picking up leaves, the inmates will build trails, haul equipment, plant, water, weed, mow and cut on the city’s 10,500 acres of park land.
Though the city claims to have “no interest” in expanding the program, Santner did not rule out the possibility that inmates could do other jobs in the future. “If the need arises,” Santner wrote, “expansion would not occur without the involvement and consent of Local 483.”
Oregon’s inmate work program was created by a 1994 ballot measure. Critics say Measure 17, which was backed by the pro-business Oregon Roundtable, was always intended to be a union-buster, though it was sold as a way to get tough on crime.
Prison labor “puts a huge amount of downward pressure on the value of our work,” Beetle says.
Parks officials say about 25 percent of their maintenance backlog is handled by volunteers, inmate crews or other non-staffers. The bureau employs just two full-time maintenance workers, who each make about $23,000 a year. Why hire more, when the city can rent a crew of 10 inmates from the state for the low, low price of $400 a day?
That daily rate is likely to increase, because it falls about $135 short of covering the Corrections Department’s costs, says Columbia River Correctional Institution spokeswoman Susan Erickson. Of course, a rate increase would cut into the city’s cost savings.
Money, not safety, was the union’s chief concern. Erickson says sex offenders, arsonists and prisoners with a history of escape or behavioral problems (as opposed to well-behaved criminals) do not work outside.
The parks bureau’s Downing says inmates may work in a park where children play, but they won’t work in the kids’ immediate vicinity. Schools and day cares are notified in advance when an inmate crew is scheduled to work nearby, Downing says.
He also says the city’s union-represented crews like having the jailbirds around because “they’re highly productive.”
DDDDDave
They are not "parole Officers" they are prison gaurds and prisoners. Read the article. Parole comes after prison. And if your into saving money how about not having folks in prison who are mentally ill, or drug addicts. Save the space and money for sex offenders and violent crime offenders.
Parks also cuts corners by having Portland Patrol Inc. patrol parks downtown, which is much cheaper and non-union.
There is ample precedent in Multnomah County and the State of Oregon for inmate work crews, sheriff’s office managed work crews, as well as unpaid community service in lieu of jail and fines as condition of probation. The Prison Reform and Inmate Work Act (Ballot Measure 17) was passed by Oregon voters in November 1994 and is now part of Article 1 of the Oregon Constitution. This amendment requires that inmates "should work as hard as the taxpayers who provide their upkeep" and "inmates confined within corrections institutions must be fully engaged in productive activity." Since passage, the act has only been sparingly implemented and many productive work opportunities for inmates have not been undertaken because of reluctance on the part of the State Department of Corrections relying on a variety of greatly overstated security and staffing concerns. As a result, inmates have been relegated to recycling and mulching operations ( including leaf collection) in addition to making prison clothing “on the inside to be worn on the outside”. The money state inmates receive for their labors is a pittance compared to what civil service employees earn. When combined with retirement and medical benefits city employees receive it is insignificant for the value of the work that is performed. The difference should be seen as symbolic restitution for the crimes they have committed which have cost taxpayers enormous amounts of money to support, process, cloth, feed and house them. Notwithstanding the unions concerns seeing the city step up and make use of these crews fits with the state and county commitment to restorative justice. It is indeed a good idea and well supported by law.








If the Parole Office thinks accepting "5 cents an hour" is an "appropriate work habit", then the Parole Officers should lead with their own example. Think how much money the county would save!