Juicy Suits: Cliff Hanger
A new lawsuit rings in the ski season at Mount Hood.
November 18th, 2009
Murmurs • Going Rogue Each Week4 comments
November 18th, 2009
Dr. Know2 comments
November 18th, 2009
Letters to the Editor • Inbox1 comment
November 18th, 2009
Cover Story • Randyland, Part II | WW examines whether Randy Leonard is using his power to benefit downtown’s largest private property owner.80 comments
November 18th, 2009
Rogue of the Week • Bureau Of Transportation | One more mouth to feed.5 comments
November 18th, 2009
The Back Of The Bus | Why TriMet is carrying Anti-Fred Meyer ads. 3 comments
November 18th, 2009
Chronic Debate | Where there’s smoke, there’s a dispute.0 comments
November 18th, 2009
Making It Rain | Oregon’s most litigious stripper is out to reform the industry.13 comments
November 18th, 2009
Fire Drilled | After the blaze at Marysville School, a retired inspector sounds the alarm.11 comments
November 18th, 2009
By The Numbers | Fare Trade0 comments
![]() Mountain of lawsuits: All seasons, all court cases on WWire’s Juicy Suits. |
[November 28th, 2007]
The first skiers of the season hit Mount Hood Meadows last week after a storm the previous weekend dumped two feet of snow on Portland’s most popular ski area.
As if sensing the change in weather, a Portland lawyer and amateur skier hit Mount Hood Meadows with a lawsuit two days before the snowstorm.
In the lawsuit, filed Nov. 15 in Multnomah County Circuit Court, real-estate lawyer Randal Johnson claims he was skiing Jan. 12, 2006, when he “suddenly dropped off a sheer embankment for which Mt. Hood Meadows had provided no markings or warnings.” Johnson’s attorney, Brian Posewitz, tells WW his 46-year-old client was skiing near the Vista Express lift when he went over the drop. Posewitz declined to say how far his client fell. But the lawsuit says Johnson suffered a broken left leg.
“The embankment off of which plaintiff fell was not reasonably obvious, apparent or necessary,” the lawsuit says. “If Mt. Hood Meadows had not created the embankment, or had eliminated or marked the embankment, plaintiff would not have fallen off the embankment and would not have been injured.”
Johnson is seeking $116,000 to cover medical bills, plus pain and suffering. Dave Tragethon, spokesman for Mount Hood Meadows, says the ski area doesn’t comment on litigation.
WWire readers know we’ve been covering other colorful lawsuits in a regular online column since Aug. 15. In the past three-plus months, Juicy Suits has ranked among WWire’s most widely read features.
The effort has highlighted the hidden gems of Multnomah County litigation and generated its own trenchant reader commentary. Here are some recent favorites, along with reader comments posted online:
advertisement
—Nov. 16: A California woman sues Fred Meyer for injuries she sustained when a stocker allegedly hit her with a turkey he was swinging in the chain’s Medford store two days before Thanksgiving 2005.
Reader comment: “That problem is that, with the holiday crowds, you can’t swing a dead turkey without hitting someone.”
—Oct. 24: A Hillsboro man sues Shanghai Tunnel after he was allegedly beaten up by an ID checker at the popular downtown bar July 29, suffering a broken nose and facial lacerations.
Reader comment: “Drunken louts from the suburbs coming downtown like they think they are somebody. It was always few and far between back in the day...we would beat ’em down and send ’em back to the ’burbs to tell their friends.”
—Oct. 2: The owners’ association at the Elizabeth Lofts Condominiums in the Pearl District sues a fellow tenant for allegedly dropping cigarette butts off his balcony.
Reader comment: “I live in the Pearl and this is over the top. We already have a reputation that WWeek and others love to exploit for their own profit. We don’t need this to help.” 
To read the entire Juicy Suits catalog, go here.
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Juicy Suits: Cliff Hanger”
hey does anyone know what has happened with Schmaltzie's lawsuit against the guy who's arm he broke....just wondering...











