Logo
Lovejoy Surgicenter
ISSUE #34.09 • NEWS • NEWS STORY
[CITY HALL]

Sam The Tax Man


Opponents say they’ll refer Sam Adams’ tax to the ballot: here’s why they might gain traction.

Social bookmarking | Permalink
Email | Print | Rate It! | 24 comments
Recently in "News"

August 20th, 2008
Letters to the Editor • Inbox0 comments

August 20th, 2008
The Score • Teenage Drinkers, Bikini Coffee and Cuban Showgirls0 comments

August 20th, 2008
Street Race | Renaming rules create an accidental competition between Latino activists and sci-fi geeks. 0 comments

August 20th, 2008
Sect Appeal | Forget Olympic fever in Beijing. There’s a Chinese eatery in Old Town that offers instant bliss and cheap veggie grub.0 comments

August 20th, 2008
Something Difficult | Same song, different verse: Uninsured Portland band faces huge medical bills. 0 comments

August 20th, 2008
Murmurs • News That Will Never Accept A No. 2 Spot.

0 comments

August 20th, 2008
Rogue of the Week • Vladimir Putin | Georgia on our mind0 comments

August 20th, 2008
Take Me to the River | Bring your own Bible: Party in Portland this weekend with evangelicals.0 comments

August 20th, 2008
Obama in Black And White | Why aren’t these Portlanders voting for him?0 comments

August 20th, 2008
Cover Story • Sliced Bread, Beware | A better fire hose, a poker aid & a foldable clipboard—meet six Portland inventors whose big ideas are the best thing since, well, you know.0 comments



IMAGE: Lukas Ketner
BY NIGEL JAQUISS | njaquiss at wweek dot com

[January 9th, 2008]

When city Commissioner Sam Adams rolls out his “Safe, Sound and Green Streets” proposal this week , he’ll be asking Portlanders for $463 million over 15 years to fix city streets, at the same time he’s running for mayor.

For political cover against any charges that he’s ramming through a tax, Adams convened an 89-member stakeholder committee that seemed to include every special interest except Eskimos. Adams, the commissioner in charge of transportation, also spent $420,000 of city money to send three citywide mailers and hold a dozen open houses and town halls.

The outreach was effective: Trade unions, cyclists and the Portland Business Alliance back his proposal. But one group that potentially has the muscle to thwart Adams has big concerns. And on Tuesday that group told WW it would work to refer the tax to voters.

While the tax would cost each Portland household about $4.50 per month and businesses would pay according to the number of customer trips they generated, a coalition of convenience stores, gas stations and fast-food restaurants says the trips-generated calculation is too confusing. And unfair, given that big stores such as the Hollywood Fred Meyer that sell a variety of non-food items will be classified as “shopping centers” and charged a lower rate than coalition members.

“For us, it is a predictability issue,” says Danielle Romain, who represents the coalition. “How much will a local store owner pay each month? We’d like it to be fair and proportionate to other stores.”

Adams plans a first reading of his measure at council Wednesday, Jan. 9, followed by a council vote on Jan. 16. The tax would then go into effect June 1, 2008—unless Romain’s clients collect the 18,000 signatures needed to refer the tax. The very threat of such a referral in 2001 caused then-city Commissioner Charlie Hales to junk a council-approved street maintenance fee.

Here are three reasons voters might take issue this time with Adams’ carefully constructed measure:

The tax does far more than fix potholes: Adams’ office has emphasized the city’s deteriorating streets, often stressing $422 million in unmet maintenance needs. Nobody would deny the city’s streets are in lousy shape, with a growing 627-mile backlog of streets in crummy condition. Yet a healthy $24.2 million—or about 5 percent of the total tax—won’t go for maintenance but for building 112 miles of new “bike boulevards.”

Adams says the expenditure acknowledges bicycles’ growing share of the city’s transportation load. Somewhere between 4 and 6 percent of Portlanders commute primarily by bike, according to the city Department of Transportation. And the $24.2 million also addresses safety issues highlighted last October when two cyclists were struck and killed in less than two weeks.

“Safety has been up front and center in our thinking,” Adams says. “It’s what the public wants us to spend money on.”















icon Story continues below

advertisement

advertisement

While the city will still have plenty of unpaved streets 15 years from now, Adams says the boulevards will reduce oil consumption and pollution, reduce car-bike conflict and ease congestion. In the event of a referral, that’s essentially a bet that bike-lovers trump tax-haters.

The new tax will be expensive: When the city issues bonds for capital construction, such as the $54 million bond floated in 1998 to renovate and build new fire stations, about 2 percent of the proceeds goes to administrative overhead.

But because the new tax would involve ongoing tax collections, customer service and accounting and engineering oversight (involving the hiring of more than a dozen new PDOT employees), it would be far more expensive to administer than other city capital projects.

Two line items for the street tax—“city billing and customer service costs” and “program oversight and accounting”—would eat up a combined $50.1 million, or 10.8 percent of the total. Adams says an independent oversight committee would review all such costs annually and make recommendations directly to City Council about whether PDOT is spending the tax money efficiently.

“This will be the most scrutinized and picked apart program in the city,” Adams says.

The tax will be complicated: Romain’s clients dislike the proposed schedule, which would charge them based on number of trips their businesses generate, because they claim consumers typically visit their stores as an afterthought.

Such calculations could indeed be an administrative headache for the city and rate payers.

But so is a proposed system of “green” discounts for individual transit users, ratepayers who don’t own cars, and ratepayers who “own one of the U.S. EPA’s top 10 highest-rated vehicles for fuel economy.” (Imagine the frustration if you had the 11th most fuel-efficient car.)

Businesses located within 300 feet of a transit route or that subsidize employees’ transit use could also qualify for discounts on their tax bills.

In total, ratepayers could qualify for up to a 30 percent discount, which could cost the city up to $700,000 per year.

John Charles, president of the libertarian Cascade Policy Institute, says green incentives have nothing to do with fixing potholes and should be handled separate from a tax.

Adams disagrees. He says the discounts have two purposes: first, to encourage conservation, and secondly, to reward that desired behavior.

“Our polling showed that people want to do the right thing, but they also want to be rewarded for it,” Adams says.

Adams recognizes not everybody will love his proposal, although he’s confident he has the votes he needs on the council. He questions whether Romain’s group was ever willing to reach an agreement—or can reach a referral.

“They have 30 days to gather 18,000 signatures,” he says of potential opponents. “I don’t know if they can do it.”

Fact: PDOT gets about two-thirds of its maintenance budget from the state gas tax, which is 24 cents per gallon and has not been raised since 1993. The city agency has cut its budget by $42 million over the past seven years.

 

Rate This Story
3 average/10 votes

 
read all 24 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “Sam The Tax Man”

17

$4.50/month. Hello? $4.50/month.

Wingnuts:Willamette Week comments::moth:flame

christopher, Jan 13th, 2008 9:54pm
18

Where does the figure of 5% (or $24.2 million) for bike improvements from the revenues generated by this new tax come from? I read the ordinances as posted on the city's website and see nothing there ...

Rick, Jan 16th, 2008 11:49pm
19

You want the bicyclists to pay? Good news: they do. They get a bill too. The 5% or so spent on bikes is pretty consistent with their mode share. The list of projects is on the website. The oversi...

R, Jan 17th, 2008 2:16pm
20

It is time for the people of Portland ot open their eyes and see the socialistic view that Sam Adams and the Tommy Potter Clan are pushing down our throats. He wants to reward those who comply with ...

Al Smith, Feb 2nd, 2008 10:48am
 
 
 





Recently in Willamette Week
August 20th 2008Sliced Bread, Beware | A better fire hose, a poker aid & a foldable clipboard—meet six Portland inventors whose big ideas are the best thing since, well, you know.
August 20th 2008How to Live Cheap in Portland | Throwing too much money away on food and shelter? here’s WW’s Recession Survival Guide.
August 20th 2008The Queer and the Qur’an | Ali is gay. And Muslim. Can he be both?
August 20th 2008Good Cop, Mad Cop | Many of Navin Sharma’s colleagues in the Vancouver Police Department can’t believe he got fired. After reading this, neither will you.
August 20th 2008Lean, Mean Meat-Free Machine | Portlander Robert Cheeke is the face of vegan bodybuilding.
August 20th 2008The Sopranokovs | The Russian mob comes to town with a new scam—medical identity theft.
August 20th 2008Manhunter | Almost every state lets bounty hunters chase down its most wanted. Why doesn’t Oregon?
August 20th 2008Get Wet: WW’s Summer Guide 2008 | The rain is finally over. Now let’s get wet!
August 20th 2008New Kids In The Flock | Gresham’s twin teenage sensations go about their Father’s business. And it’s making them superstars.