November 4th, 2009
University Of Oregon | Who’s killing Rudolph?5 comments
October 28th, 2009
Metro | A blowhard answer to global warming? 5 comments
October 21st, 2009
Michael Ruppert | Peak trouble for an Oregon author.23 comments
October 7th, 2009
Beaverton Police | Zero tolerance for video recorders.11 comments
September 30th, 2009
Lynn Peterson | C’mon, Dems. Are Kitzhaber and Bradbury that formidable?3 comments
September 23rd, 2009
Denny Doyle | Beaverton mayor hits a foul ball.3 comments
September 2nd, 2009
Oregon Bankers Association | For bailouts, then against them.6 comments
August 19th, 2009
Wal-Mart | Save money. Live worse.9 comments
August 12th, 2009
Rep. Earl Blumenauer | Phoning it in.15 comments
August 5th, 2009
Brenda Sturdevant | Offended by a miniskirt.3 comments
![]() |
[January 9th, 2008]
A new survey of wireless service in Portland has gotten the Rogue Desk’s attention.
The analysis deals with MetroFi, the company that City Council chose in April 2006 to bring free wireless Internet access to Portland. MetroFi promised then that its network would be 95 percent complete in a year or two.
We’ve reported on major snags in that timetable (see “Unwired and Unloved,” WW, Aug. 29, 2007), though the city remains confident that the 95 percent figure will at least be achieved by the end of 2008. But now, even the lagging results so far may be overstated, according to a survey conducted by Russell Senior.
Senior spent 35 hours locating and checking each of MetroFi’s 677 access points in Portland to test whether the free wireless Internet is as accessible as MetroFi’s status map claims online at www.metrofi.com/cities-16.html. Is Senior just a pissed-off, uninformed consumer? No, he is a principal investigator with Unwire PDX Watch, a project dedicated to testing the availability of Portland’s municipal area networks.
Unwire PDX Watch’s survey findings reveal a wide disparity between MetroFi’s declarations of growth and its online map, which shows 36 more in-service access points in Portland than actually exist. Senior’s conclusion from that disparity: The access points only connect about 4.2 percent of the city’s area instead of the 29 percent MetroFi CEO Chuck Haas insists online.
MetroFi’s vice president of operations, Lucie Poulicakos, calls the map problem small, but says the report was useful and that the company plans corrections in the next few days. The city’s point man on wireless, Logan Kleier, says he hasn’t had a chance to verify Senior’s survey but believes about 20 percent of the city is covered.
Senior said he investigated the city’s wireless issue because it “is interesting and fun,” but he “wouldn’t have bothered if MetroFi was more transparent.” Check out the full report at unwirepdx-watch.org.
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Metrofi”
I have recently switched to home wireless using an indoor wireless antenna to boost the metrofi signal. It works pretty good most of the time. But now with the required MSN SideView which is always o...
We're 800 feet from a Metro-Fi access point and managed to build a very solid radio link using a 400mW bridge and a 14dBi patch antenna up on the side of the house. Service was fine 90 percent of the...
I didn?t think Metro-Fi was too bad, well until the day they started requiring msn sideguide, that kind of ruined the whole experience for me. I didn?t mind the banners at all and they weren?t nearly ...
I have been a habitual user of MetroFi for a few months now. I don












