Boom With A View
Economics vs. Environment in the Gorge.
May 7th, 2008
Cover Story • Best New Band 2008 | Portland music insiders take our local scene to the chopping block—and come out with 10 new faves. 0 comments
May 7th, 2008
Holy Smoke | High times for marijuana marchers.9 comments
May 7th, 2008
Trib Translation | An annotation of last week’s news about the news.9 comments
May 7th, 2008
Murmurs • Where We Gather Each Week To See How We Live.4 comments
May 7th, 2008
Rogue of the Week • Elaine Franklin | Thy name is mud-slinging.1 comment
May 7th, 2008
Honor Thy Neighbor | But covet your own U.S. Senate candidate.0 comments
May 7th, 2008
Quick Picks for the Primary | A WW endorsements cheat sheet for your vote-by-mail ballot.2 comments
May 7th, 2008
Pop Quiz • What do you see in the picture? | WW’s weekly election feature—designed to scare the hell out of City Hall candidates.0 comments
May 7th, 2008
Getting In Gear | Can 5,000 cyclists swing a City Hall election?0 comments
May 7th, 2008
The Big Dump | A Sauvie Island resident’s fight to prevent an isle of blight.3 comments
![]() Gouge in the Gorge: A rendering of what one stretch of the Columbia Gorge could look like. IMAGE: broughtonlanding.com |
[February 6th, 2008]
The Columbia River Gorge Commission is deliberating whether to let a lumber company build a 250-unit resort in violation of existing rules against a large-scale development. And Gorge defenders are crying foul.
“The level of political pressure is particularly unusual,” says Michael Lang, a spokesman for Friends of the Columbia Gorge. “[Congressman] Brian Baird [D-Wash.] is really pushing this.”
Congress and then-President Ronald Reagan created the Gorge Commission by passing the National Scenic Area Act in 1986. The Act gave the commission two tasks: to protect the Gorge and to promote its development.
Now those two tasks are in conflict as struggling timber companies must find new uses for their land and Skamania County, Wash., needs to boost its sluggish economy.
` On Jan. 10, Jill Arens, the commission’s executive director, sided with the economic development mandate. She recommended the 13-member commission approve an amendment allowing Broughton Lumber Company to build a resort on a 50-acre inactive mill site it owns on the Washington side of the Gorge. The commission will hold its last public hearing on the matter at the Hood River Best Western Inn at 9 am Feb. 12, and will reach a final decision in March.
Arens calls the issue “very complicated” and says she sided with Broughton because it offered “a reasonable solution that will help the gorge overall.”
Nonetheless, the timing of a letter sent Oct. 4 by Baird and U.S. Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) encouraging the commission to accept Broughton’s development offer raises questions with Friends of the Columbia Gorge and others.
Last Sept. 17 and 20, Baird received $11,000 in contributions from executives with Broughton and SDS Lumber—two Bingen, Wash., companies that share owners and top executives.
Pat Meeks, a Klickitat County Democrat, researched the contribution histories of SDS owner Wally Stevenson as well as SDS president—and Broughton general manager—Jason Spadaro. Meeks, who opposes the development, says she was “extremely surprised” to discover “that a company that has always supported such conservative candidates would suddenly give to a liberal Democrat.”
advertisement
“This isn’t the first time I’ve contributed to a Democratic campaign, nor will it be the last,” Spadaro says. “I support individuals based on the policies they vote for, not their party affiliations.”
Baird’s letter sounded the alarm for Lang and Meeks because they say Baird has a good record otherwise on Gorge issues. Baird, however, says his support for the Broughton Landing Resort is genuine and that it “vastly predates the contributions.”
“Here’s an opportunity to take an eyesore and turn it into something useful,” Baird says.
U.S. Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore) differs from his fellow Democrat. “While I have no objection to appropriate economic development in the Gorge,” Blumenauer wrote to the commission on Jan. 25, “this proposal appears to me on an unnecessarily large scale and in conflict with the provisions of the act.”
While there’s little doubt that Baird wants to create the 288 temporary and 60 permanent jobs Broughton Lumber claims the project will create, Lang says economic growth is possible without the amendment.
Lang supports the development of a “rustic resort” that includes cabins and camping on the site. Broughton, Lang believes, intends to build a housing project with “no assurance the public would have access.”
Says Arens: “I don’t like to predict, but it may well be that we’ll end up in court.”







And now for the rest of the self-executing template:
1. Spineless Dem from outside of PDX sells out to developer
2. Envirolitigators begin to circle and use land use laws to enforce their version of morality and proper development, as distinct from that of greedy developer
3. PDX politicians milk controversy
4. Media milks controversy
5. Government agency whores itself to developer and approves project
6. Court makes conservative decision siding with envirolitigators concept of moral and proper development to stop project and awards fees to happy envirolitigators
7. Land use law recognized as unsustainable, selectively enforced, meaningless vehicle for political decisionmaking under the color of law that it is
8. Developer issues standard gripe about anti development attitudes
9. Spineless Dem makes off with campaign cash
10. Hippies blather about how area "saved" was "sacred"
10. Rinse, lather, repeat ad nauseum. Form new shell group for envirolitigation if necessary. See e.g., Cooper Spur.