February 3rd, 2010
Clearwire | For a communications company, it doesn’t listen too well.8 comments
January 27th, 2010
Oregon School Activities Association | Stop spelling “T-E-A-M” With an “I.” 0 comments
January 13th, 2010
Schubert Flint Public Affairs | Prop. 8’s fear mongers return to Oregon for Measures 66 and 67.3 comments
January 6th, 2010
Associated Oregon Industries | Claiming free speech to stomp unions.3 comments
December 16th, 2009
Lewis & Clark | Trafficking in B.S.18 comments
December 9th, 2009
Port Of Portland | What’s a public agency got against peaceful dissent?1 comment
November 18th, 2009
Bureau Of Transportation | One more mouth to feed.12 comments
November 11th, 2009
Washington Co. DA’s Office | Abusing a domestic violence law.28 comments
November 4th, 2009
University Of Oregon | Who’s killing Rudolph?7 comments
October 28th, 2009
Metro | A blowhard answer to global warming? 6 comments
 |
[February 6th, 2008]
Let’s be clear: Oregon Petroleum Association rep Paul Romain pulled a slimy move last week when he broke a bargain with Commissioner Sam Adams on Adams’ $464 million transportation tax.
Yes, Adams has made a case to seek money for new asphalt, traffic signals and bike routes. But Romain makes a valid point (as did crotchety blogger Jack Bogdanski this week): Adams has gone to Roguish lengths to keep Portlanders from voting on his tax when he’s also running for mayor.
Until last month, Adams was doing a good job building support for his plan. Then, in order to complicate Romain’s ballot-referral threats and legal challenges, Adams broke his transportation package into three chunks.
On Jan. 30, Adams announced Romain had agreed to drop his signature-gathering plans in exchange for reduced fees for his convenience-store clients. (Basically, Adams gave a $1.1 million break to the very folks he now calls “Big Oil” stooges.)
But when a relieved Adams recombined his plan into a single ordinance, Romain reneged, saying he’d agreed to not oppose the “measures,” but would still seek to refer the “measure.” (Romain argues Adams doesn’t know what the meaning of “s” is.)
So why not call Romain’s bluff, and take the tax to the ballot? “They have no intention of making this a deal in good faith. They don’t have any more good faith,” says Adams.
OK. But after watching this duel, it’s hard not to conclude that Adams’ real motivation is as Romain suggests, that Adams fears voters would reject his tax—and his mayoral candidacy along with it.
On Wednesday, Feb. 6, the City Council hears Adams’ plan for the second time, in three parts. And then it’s gone till November.
Story continues belowadvertisement
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Sam Adams”
"Randy's speech was brilliant"?
Boy are there some stupid people stopping by here.
To them, dishonest, fabricated jibberish sounds brilliant.
I LIKE paying local taxes. At least I know they're going to improve my community, not support the OILY MAN's bloody wars. If you don't like paying local taxes, I suggest you move to some decrepit bibl...
A big problem for this tax is its going on a ballot with other financing requests. Schools are asking for money, so are Parks, so are...
Voters my see all that money and just say n...
peter,
You couldn't be more foolish if you don't think people sit in traffic for miles arund here.
Thanks to people like Sam and YOU our congestion is worsening f...
_2.jpg&contenttype=jpeg)
