Weapons of Marine Destruction
The Battle over W.E.D.s on the Willamette comes to the state Marine Board next week.
September 3rd, 2008
Letters to the Editor • Inbox1 comment
September 3rd, 2008
The Score • Elephants Suffer, On All Fronts.0 comments
September 3rd, 2008
Congressional Cribs | WW takes a tour of our federal lawmakers’ D.C. homes and finds a barn, a boat and a suburban McMansion. Play along.2 comments
September 3rd, 2008
Back To Fool | For dozens of Portland students, going back to school means shopping for books and clothes … And P.E. credits?5 comments
September 3rd, 2008
Losing Faith | A young Marine finds his candidate in Denver.5 comments
September 3rd, 2008
Murmurs • News That’s Pregnant When Teenagers Are, Too.2 comments
September 3rd, 2008
Rogue of the Week • Mayor Tom Potter | Fool me twice.7 comments
September 3rd, 2008
DIY Justice | In Oregon, The Man lets you be The Man, too. Here’s how to play traffic cop.1 comment
September 3rd, 2008
The Coffee Files | That daily cup of joe is burning a hole in your gut. What about your wallet?0 comments
September 3rd, 2008
Cover Story • OMFG IT'S MFNW!4 comments
![]() Wake Up: Willamette Riverfront property owners want regulators to do something about large synthetic wakes. IMAGE: sean dreilinger / durak.org |
[February 27th, 2008]
Residents of small Willamette River communities 20 miles south of Portland say they’ve identified weapons of marine destruction that have accelerated erosion, damaging both their properties and salmon habitats.
The WMDs are actually WEDs, or wake enhancement devices, that can pump up to 2,000 pounds of water to generate waves up to 3 feet high for wakeboarders.
“The advent of this kind of boat and its impact on the upper Willamette is an ecological disaster,” says Larry Michel, a Wilsonville riverfront homeowner.
In 2004, Michel lost a 36-foot-long, 32-foot-wide and 4-foot-deep section of riverbank to erosion. A fix was appraised at $42,000. Instead, Michel spent 80 hours and $1,125 on a DIY job involving a backhoe, plants and netting that he says will stall erosion for four years at best.
Fellow riverfront homeowner Mike McGuire traces increased erosion to 2000, about the time WEDs began to appear. Since then, about 50 homeowners from Wilsonville, West Linn and Aurora have complained to the Oregon State Marine Board about damage to their properties as well as to the river’s ecosystem. They say salmon suffer because wake-caused erosion increases silt, which in turn increases water temperature.
Instead of banning WEDs, as many
homeowners would like, the marine board has sought to educate wakeboard boat operators to use the middle of the Willamette instead of hugging the shoreline. Michel says that request isn’t realistic, with four boats going each way on a narrow, 500-foot-wide strip of river.
On March 6, the board has scheduled a demonstration in the Newberg Pool that may lead to new regulations. The demo will test how wakeboarding boats with—and without—WEDs generate wakes and how far the wakes travel. Landowners claim wakes don’t dissipate much as they travel across the channel. And wakeboarders claim only the wake shape is changed by WEDs.
Randy Henry, the board’s operations policy analyst, says large boat wakes do contribute to undercutting banks, but thinks “there are other forces at play,” such as land development.
advertisement
While some homeowners want a wakeboarding ban, Michel wants the board to limit wake sizes on the Willamette to 10 inches. That can be accomplished by turning off WEDs and limiting boat size to under 22 feet. These are the same regulations that privately governed Lake Oswego has adopted to curb erosion.
Homeowners are skeptical the board will take any strong regulatory action because two of the five board members have ties to the boating industry. Board member Deborah McQueen used to own a boat dealership and now is a sales representative for fishing products. Another board member, Trey Carskadon, does advertising and marketing work for Stevens Marine, a boat dealer in Tigard and Milwaukie.
Henry says the board is objective, noting the other three members include a retired biology teacher, a retired legislator and a former mayor.
And McQueen believes she can be unbiased, telling WW, “We have been gravely interested in resolving this problem.”
McQueen says she will recuse herself from a decision if needed, though she adds, “All boats can make wake with very little effort, whether they have [WEDs] or not.”
Travis Williams, executive director of environmental watchdog Willamette Riverkeeper, says the marine board has been fair so far. But while he says riverbank erosion happens naturally, the constant motion from high, stacked boat wakes is “not natural,” leading over time to banks sloughing into the river at an accelerated rate.
Some wakeboarders say pushback by
homeowners is a typical generational divide, in this case between young boarders and old fogies.
“It may accelerate the damage that is already occurring, but I would say [the riverfront homeowners] probably dislike us more than just the erosion,” says wakeboarder Ryan Barmore, 20.
Michel denies any bias. “Sure, their stereos in their boats are really loud and they’re playing rap—there’s f-this and f-that as they go by your house,” Michel said. “But a social issue doesn’t erode banks and produce big wakes.”
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Weapons of Marine Destruction”
I forgot to add. The large three foot wakes are created when doing what is called Wake Surfing. The boat is weighted heavily to one side and a rider rides a wake surfboard right behind the boat. A ...
Wow. Crazy to see how many people want to have a say on what is happening to the river. I wish those same people would have had the voice and initiative to clean it up for the last 20 years. Now my ge...
Are you riverfront homeowners telling me that I have to sell my SeaRay 260? I don't think so. If you want to do someting productive then possibly there should be a statewide ban on tower speakers or ...
Lots of info on the cost of boat wake erosion is at http://BoatWakes.info








