Logo
Aequis
ISSUE #34.20 • NEWS •
Rogue of the Week

City Club Of Portland


They Don’t Want Candy.

Social bookmarking | Permalink
Email | Print | Rate It! | 11 comments
Recently in "Rogue of the Week"

May 7th, 2008
Elaine Franklin | Thy name is mud-slinging.1 comment

April 30th, 2008
Oregon Employment Division | Deep in the heart of taxes.0 comments

April 23rd, 2008
Dave Frohnmayer | UO president is hiding the ball.13 comments

April 16th, 2008
Kate Brown | The Secretary of Hypocrisy2 comments

April 9th, 2008
Assumed Business Name Renewal Service | Assume nothing.7 comments

April 2nd, 2008
Sho Dozono | Please read before signing.28 comments

March 19th, 2008
Richard Lamanna III | Copping An Address19 comments

March 12th, 2008
Randall Palazzo | Not exactly building community.69 comments

March 5th, 2008
Ling Garden | No living wage.23 comments

February 27th, 2008
Jim Middaugh | Don’t hold back.5 comments


BY WW EDITORIAL STAFF | 503-243-2122

[March 26th, 2008] Peace is a woman’s job, Jeannette Rankin famously said when she was Congress’ first female member and opposed U.S. involvement in World Wars I.

In 2008, Candy Neville—who’s running in Oregon’s Democratic primary for U.S. Senate—is doing her part to make sure voters have candidates who think ending the Iraq war is everyone’s job.

Unfortunately, Neville’s efforts have been rejected by City Club of Portland , this week’s Rogue for barring Neville from the club’s upcoming debate focusing on the Senate primary. The rejection is both undemocratic and unnecessary.

City Club’s April 4 debate spotlights the Democratic candidates for U.S. Senate hoping to unseat Sen. Gordon Smith (R-Ore.). There are six, including Neville. But the City Club has invited only Oregon House Speaker Jeff Merkley and activist Steve Novick.

“We want our debate to be as in-depth, substantive and useful to voters as possible,” says Wade Fickler, the club’s interim executive director. “In this case, we think there are two very clear front-runners.”

Neville says City Club debates are supposed to provide voters a public service. “In this election, it’s important that I be heard,” says Neville, the only woman among the six candidates. “If [voters] want to reject me, then reject me. If they want to elect me, then elect me. But don’t eliminate me.”

The Rogue Desk agrees with Neville. Merkley and Novick managed to contend with a third antiwar voice in an issues-centered debate earlier this month at the Eugene City Club, and Neville’s stress on arguably the campaign’s most substantive issue—the war—should earn her a City Club of Portland invite.














icon Story continues below

advertisement
3900 Festival
advertisement

Rate This Story
2.33 average/9 votes

Comment on this article

Vicky  writes on Mar 26th, 2008 11:31am

Mr. Fickler and his puppy associates at City Club wouldn't know "in-depth, substantive and useful" to save their lives! Once a prestigious organization, the "Club" is now populated with sheep, not members, that come to hard left conclusions & only then commit to "research" that supports the established conclusion. I resigned my membership four years ago and when they called me to urge me to rejoin: I went into my 23 years at City Club, what the institutional memory required, strengths/weaknesses, etc. I waited for a response (absolute silence) and I hung up. Classy joint- NOT.

Bad Boy Brown  writes on Mar 26th, 2008 12:30pm

The City Club is a pathetic joke populated by leftist sheeple. God forbid if an honest conservative came there to speak and spouted anything that goes against the LIEberal sheeple mantra.

E.PDXer  writes on Mar 26th, 2008 2:37pm

Love ya, WillyWeek, but come on. There are two very obvious frontrunners in this race, and Neville is very clearly not one of them. Novick may have even been a fringe candidate last fall, but now it's looking like this primary will be really close. Between two candidates, not three.

Richard Ellmyer  writes on Mar 26th, 2008 3:12pm

What's Good For The Goose Is Good For The Gander?

"Starting Saturday, March 15, visitors to CandidatesGoneWild. com will be able to vote—just once—for the SEVEN candidates they would like to see onstage. The winners will be announced on April 10."

 
JimG  writes on Mar 26th, 2008 5:31pm

Ellmyer and E.PDXer have it exactly right. The purpose of the debate is for City Club members and the public to hear from candidates with a reasonable chance to be elected. It is not to provide a forum for those running whimsically, regardless of the issues they claim to champion. I'm sure Novick, and even Merkley, will provide plenty of criticism of Bush's war. What else but laziness explains WW's inability to come up with any true Rogue this week?

Mikey  writes on Mar 26th, 2008 11:14pm

Also, Willamette Week's own CGW event is doing the same thing!

Candy Neville  writes on Mar 27th, 2008 7:18am

Have some of you lost all sense of curiosity? Are you really willing to allow the self-appointed "in crowd" to make your selections for you - without even checking things out? Beware of being trusting to the point of obedient.

Deke  writes on Mar 27th, 2008 10:37am

Gee Candy, maybe they just don't want to hear a bunch of leftist, anti-war ravings.

There are people in this state that support the war.

Bravo for the city club!

bs  writes on Mar 28th, 2008 9:38am

Can you say early presidential race debates? Having 9 candidates on stage to "debate" was an absolute joke. There was no meaningful "debate" in any of those. The same would hold true with 6 candidate for the U.S. Senate race. Where is the public service in a waste of time where each "debater" basically gets to introduce themselves.

WWeek, get off your high horse. A meaningful debate is more useful than sound bites among a herd of candidates.

Jonathan Radmacher  writes on Mar 31st, 2008 1:02pm

On OPB this morning, there was a story about Jeff Merkley and Steve Novick running to unseat Gordon Smith. No mention of the marginal, non-viable candidates. Which means that the City Club of Portland is in good company, and Willamette Week has next week's Rogue!

Dave Lister  writes on Mar 31st, 2008 1:54pm

The difference between CGW and the City Club is there is a vote for CGW. The City Club just checks campaign contributions and picks the two top money raisers. Pretty good for a progressive outfit that supports public campaign financing, dontcha think?

Comment on the "City Club Of Portland" article



Recently in Willamette Week
May 10th 2008Best New Band 2008 | Portland music insiders take our local scene to the chopping block—and come out with 10 new faves.
May 10th 2008For The Love of Politics | WW’s endorsement page-turner has all the candidates worth falling for this election.
May 10th 2008Say Amen, Somebody | African-American ministers struggle to make their voices heard in America’s whitest city.
May 10th 2008Green With Envy | Seven things Portland should do if we’re serious about being green.
May 10th 2008Kvetch Fest | 27 things we hate about the city we love.
May 10th 2008Bitter Pill | A Portland doc flips on big pharma and reveals its “dirty little secret.”
May 10th 2008Gunfight at the OR Corral | A crusader who fought the Mob or a long-established Oregonian? Inside the shootout to become the next attorney general.
May 10th 2008Lean Cuisine | Has Portland lost its insatiable appetite for its restaurant scene?
May 10th 2008Barack In The Day | Long before Obama ran for president, he was a state senator in Illinois. Here’s what he did.
May 10th 2008The Adventures of Zetaman | Portland’s superhero bunks in the ’burbs and drives a minivan—when he’s not keeping our streets safe.