Logo
Lewis & Clark
ISSUE #34.24 • NEWS •
[CONSUMER]

That Dam Bill


Ratepayers and regulators want PGE to explain a land donation.

Social bookmarking | Permalink
Email | Print | Rate It! | 6 comments
Recently in "News"

October 8th, 2008
Letters to the Editor • Inbox0 comments

October 8th, 2008
The Weekly Fix • Our spin on 7 days of news0 comments

October 8th, 2008
And The Walls Come Tumbling Down | What does the financial collapse and bailout mean for Oregon borrowers and pols?0 comments

October 8th, 2008
Palin-Palooza | Here’s one “who’s who” group in Portland that thinks Sarah Palin kicked Joe Biden’s ass. 7 comments

October 8th, 2008
Q&A: Russ Feingold | A sweetheart of the left talks about where he’s agreed with John McCain and Gordon Smith…and disagreed with Barack Obama.1 comment

October 8th, 2008
Murmurs • News That’s Not Debatable5 comments

October 8th, 2008
Rogue of the Week • Cynthia Harris | There’s wrong. Then there’s Army wrong.7 comments

October 8th, 2008
Klaus-trophobia | WW’s Czechered past prompts an international incident.2 comments

October 8th, 2008
Cover Story • Unlucky Strike | The Oregon lottery is going into detox—and our state budget is along for the smoke-free ride.6 comments

October 1st, 2008
Letters to the Editor • Inbox1 comment


PGE’s Riverdance: Some PGE ratepayer groups say the utility may have given up their millions when it did a transaction that included blowing up a Sandy River dam.
IMAGE: Dennis Culver
BY NIGEL JAQUISS | njaquiss at wweek dot com

[April 23rd, 2008]

Blowing up a dam is fun. Figuring out who should pay and how much? Not so much fun.

When Portland General Electric removed the Marmot Dam on the Sandy River last September, the explosion marked the end of a complicated 23-party negotiation dating back a decade to restore the Sandy’s free flow to the Pacific.

It would have been the end, except ratepayer groups and the Oregon Public Utility Commission now want PGE to provide a better explanation of a related land donation that came out of its customers’ pockets.

Next month, the PUC will consider PGE’s request to donate 729 acres of prime land around the former dam site, which lies about 40 miles east of Portland, to a conservation group. That donation provides some valuable green cover for PGE as the Sierra Club sues the utility over emissions at its coal-fired plant in Boardman, Oregon’s only such facility.

Under terms negotiated years ago, PGE will give the Sandy River land—which the utility says has an appraised value of about $7 million—to the Portland-based Western Rivers Conservancy. The conservancy will package the land with other nearby property and sell the combination to the federal Bureau of Land Management. With the proceeds, it will buy more riparian land to create a salmon-friendly corridor along the Sandy.

Here’s the rub: PGE customers bought the land with their monthly utility payments. If PGE sold the land directly to the BLM for cash, customers would get a credit from that sale on their bills. They get no financial benefit from the giveaway.

The utility says there’s a good reason for that. Gail Baker, a PGE spokeswoman, says the land donation is part of a bigger transaction.















icon Story continues below

advertisement

advertisement

In effect, Baker says, the other 22 parties to the transaction (which include the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the state of Oregon) agreed that PGE would give away the land in order to preserve riparian habitat. In exchange, the enviros and regulators signing the agreement would agree to PGE’s preferred method of taking out the dam and mitigating the damage to fish habitat downstream.

Baker says the utility’s plan saved about $9 million from the original proposal because blowing up the dam and allowing nature to flush the sediment was that much cheaper than tearing down the dam gradually and removing built-up sediment mechanically.

That means even though ratepayers get nothing for their land, they are kept whole and maybe even slightly better off. “The option we chose was riskier but saved ratepayers money,” Baker says.

But staff at the PUC, which must approve any transfer of utility-owned land, wants more details of the savings PGE is claiming.

“We’re asking PGE to demonstrate that there is a savings to customers,” says Bryan Conway, the PUC’s lead staffer on the issue. “That’s been difficult for PGE to do.”

Customer groups such as the Citizens’ Utility Board and Industrial Customers of Northwest Utilities also want more information about those savings.

“We don’t know what the ultimate facts are, but we have concerns any time we see millions of dollars of ratepayer assets being given away, even if it’s to a well-intentioned environmental group,” says Melinda Davison, a lawyer for ICNU.

Conway expects the PUC will hold a settlement conference to resolve the issue by early June.

FACT: PGE built two dams in the Sandy watershed between 1906 and 1913. The utility will remove the second, the Little Sandy Dam, from its namesake river later this year. Removal of both dams will free up 100 stream miles and 6.5 river miles.

 

Rate This Story
4.8 average/10 votes

 
read all 6 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “That Dam Bill”

3

I can't believe PGE is again trying to give us the shaft...

Taken Again, Apr 25th, 2008 1:53pm
4

First the Enron debacle that cost us $millions and $millions. Now this. When is PGE going to play fairly with us and stop hiding the ball?

Dam It, Apr 27th, 2008 3:25pm
5

Go, Go, Go, PUC!!!

Go To It, PUC!, Apr 28th, 2008 4:24am
6

PGE screws us in the backside once again... Unfortunately, if this May's ballot had a measure similar to a few years ago, the ignorant, uneducated voters of this city and county would still vote agai...

PUD Whackers, Apr 28th, 2008 8:29pm
 
 
 




OMSI
Ad

Ad
OPB
Ad

Sponsored Links: WW Personals
Musician's Market
Snowboard Jackets


Recently in Willamette Week
October 11th 2008Unlucky Strike | The Oregon lottery is going into detox—and our state budget is along for the smoke-free ride.
October 11th 2008Jail Junkies | Who knows more about stopping property crime: Kevin Mannix or an ex-addict who stole 1,000 cars?
October 11th 2008Shipracked | Judy Shiprack wants to be your next county commissioner. Here’s what she doesn’t want you to know about a real-estate deal gone bad.
October 11th 2008Señor Smith | Low-wage Latino workers keep Sen. Gordon Smith’s family business humming. Not all of them are legal.
October 11th 2008OMFG IT'S MFNW!
October 11th 2008Sometimes a Great Lawsuit | Ken Kesey’s last prank pits his widow in a court battle with his best friend and a Playboy model.
October 11th 2008Sliced Bread, Beware | A better fire hose, a poker aid & a foldable clipboard—meet six Portland inventors whose big ideas are the best thing since, well, you know.
October 11th 2008How to Live Cheap in Portland | Throwing too much money away on food and shelter? here’s WW’s Recession Survival Guide.
October 11th 2008The Queer and the Qur’an | Ali is gay. And Muslim. Can he be both?