Logo
ISSUE #34.24 • NEWS •
[CONSUMER]

That Dam Bill


Ratepayers and regulators want PGE to explain a land donation.

Recently in "News"

February 3rd, 2010
Rogue of the Week • Clearwire | For a communications company, it doesn’t listen too well.8 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Paulson Shoots, Scores | The Timbers’ Owner closes a sweet ballpark deal, but doubts remain.3 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Sex And The City | Will gender reassignment surgery be a new city insurance benefit? 2 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Second Time Around | What the mayor will likely tout in his State of the City Speech. 0 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Hot Seat • Gov. Ted Kulongoski | Why the governor wants to deal with your kicker check in his last session.5 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Murmurs • Always Asking, Always Telling.1 comment

February 3rd, 2010
Dr. Know • Dr. Know1 comment

February 3rd, 2010
Letters to the Editor • Inbox3 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Cover Story • The Crusaders | Eight relentless watchdogs who hound public officials in pursuit of answers.44 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Ask the Editor • What Were We Thinking? | WW Editor Mark Zusman answers your questions about our coverage.2 comments


PGE’s Riverdance: Some PGE ratepayer groups say the utility may have given up their millions when it did a transaction that included blowing up a Sandy River dam.
IMAGE: Dennis Culver
BY NIGEL JAQUISS | njaquiss at wweek dot com

[April 23rd, 2008]

Blowing up a dam is fun. Figuring out who should pay and how much? Not so much fun.

When Portland General Electric removed the Marmot Dam on the Sandy River last September, the explosion marked the end of a complicated 23-party negotiation dating back a decade to restore the Sandy’s free flow to the Pacific.

It would have been the end, except ratepayer groups and the Oregon Public Utility Commission now want PGE to provide a better explanation of a related land donation that came out of its customers’ pockets.

Next month, the PUC will consider PGE’s request to donate 729 acres of prime land around the former dam site, which lies about 40 miles east of Portland, to a conservation group. That donation provides some valuable green cover for PGE as the Sierra Club sues the utility over emissions at its coal-fired plant in Boardman, Oregon’s only such facility.

Under terms negotiated years ago, PGE will give the Sandy River land—which the utility says has an appraised value of about $7 million—to the Portland-based Western Rivers Conservancy. The conservancy will package the land with other nearby property and sell the combination to the federal Bureau of Land Management. With the proceeds, it will buy more riparian land to create a salmon-friendly corridor along the Sandy.

Here’s the rub: PGE customers bought the land with their monthly utility payments. If PGE sold the land directly to the BLM for cash, customers would get a credit from that sale on their bills. They get no financial benefit from the giveaway.

The utility says there’s a good reason for that. Gail Baker, a PGE spokeswoman, says the land donation is part of a bigger transaction.















icon Story continues below

advertisement

advertisement

In effect, Baker says, the other 22 parties to the transaction (which include the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the state of Oregon) agreed that PGE would give away the land in order to preserve riparian habitat. In exchange, the enviros and regulators signing the agreement would agree to PGE’s preferred method of taking out the dam and mitigating the damage to fish habitat downstream.

Baker says the utility’s plan saved about $9 million from the original proposal because blowing up the dam and allowing nature to flush the sediment was that much cheaper than tearing down the dam gradually and removing built-up sediment mechanically.

That means even though ratepayers get nothing for their land, they are kept whole and maybe even slightly better off. “The option we chose was riskier but saved ratepayers money,” Baker says.

But staff at the PUC, which must approve any transfer of utility-owned land, wants more details of the savings PGE is claiming.

“We’re asking PGE to demonstrate that there is a savings to customers,” says Bryan Conway, the PUC’s lead staffer on the issue. “That’s been difficult for PGE to do.”

Customer groups such as the Citizens’ Utility Board and Industrial Customers of Northwest Utilities also want more information about those savings.

“We don’t know what the ultimate facts are, but we have concerns any time we see millions of dollars of ratepayer assets being given away, even if it’s to a well-intentioned environmental group,” says Melinda Davison, a lawyer for ICNU.

Conway expects the PUC will hold a settlement conference to resolve the issue by early June.

FACT: PGE built two dams in the Sandy watershed between 1906 and 1913. The utility will remove the second, the Little Sandy Dam, from its namesake river later this year. Removal of both dams will free up 100 stream miles and 6.5 river miles.

 

Rate This Story
4.8 average/10 votes

 
read all 6 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “That Dam Bill”

3

I can't believe PGE is again trying to give us the shaft...

Taken Again, Apr 25th, 2008 1:53pm
4

First the Enron debacle that cost us $millions and $millions. Now this. When is PGE going to play fairly with us and stop hiding the ball?

Dam It, Apr 27th, 2008 3:25pm
5

Go, Go, Go, PUC!!!

Go To It, PUC!, Apr 28th, 2008 4:24am
6

PGE screws us in the backside once again... Unfortunately, if this May's ballot had a measure similar to a few years ago, the ignorant, uneducated voters of this city and county would still vote agai...

PUD Whackers, Apr 28th, 2008 8:29pm
 
 
 




 

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55838) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55842) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55844) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=58781) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55843) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55841) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55839) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55840) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61


More


More


More


More


More


More


More


More

Ad
Lovejoy Surgicenter
Ad

Ad

Sponsored Links: WW Personals
Musician's Market
Snowboard Jackets
Legal Tips
Camping Gear


Recently in Willamette Week
December 31st 1969Washington State | The Canada of Oregon has it all—a Stonehenge replica, a longboarder's concrete wet dream and dark, damp underground lava caves. Vive les rocks.
December 31st 1969Oregon's Outer Edges | Crater Lake. Hell's Canyon. Wallowa and Steens mountain ranges. Hell, yeah.
December 31st 1969Central Oregon/High Desert | No rain, plenty of snow, obsidian flows and great local beer. The folks from the real eastside know how to unbend outside.
December 31st 1969Great Cascades/Columbia Gorge | With plenty of room to roam—and hot springs for your weary feet—it's the place to ramble and relax for the weekend.
December 31st 1969Willamette Valley | Monks, tracks, tubing and wine make the fertile strip a virile place to play.
December 31st 1969Stumptown | Tons of public parks, an extinct volcano and nude beach volleyball to keep you jolly. Get out and collect those merit badges, without leaving the city.
December 31st 1969The Coast | The beaches are public. You own them. Go play—hike in the old-growth forests.
December 31st 1969Cycle Tour 101: Your on-bike guide to Highway 101 | To ride the greatest bike route in Oregon, you need to get out of Portland.
December 31st 1969Doggin' It | What happens when a Portland running club jogs with pooches from the pound?
December 31st 1969Over the Edge | Sam Drevo will paddle yr ass.