November 25th, 2009
Murmurs • Our Reporting, Our Words.0 comments
November 25th, 2009
Dr. Know0 comments
November 25th, 2009
Letters to the Editor • Inbox0 comments
November 25th, 2009
Lost A Space | The new cannabis cafe’s neighbors are ticked. But not about the pot.0 comments
November 25th, 2009
Contract Killers | What’s holding up a deal between Portland Public Schools and teachers?0 comments
November 25th, 2009
Reasonable Doubts | Five Portlanders take the police union’s beanbag-video challenge.0 comments
November 25th, 2009
A Donor By Any Other Name | Corporate interests use associations to pass money to Oregon’s anti-tax campaign.0 comments
November 25th, 2009
Cover Story • Trail Mix | This holiday weekend, give thanks for your other family: The Blazers.0 comments
November 25th, 2009
Ask the Editor • What Were We Thinking? | WW Editor Mark Zusman answers your questions about our coverage.0 comments
November 18th, 2009
Murmurs • Going Rogue Each Week4 comments
![]() GOT “VISIONING”? |
[June 11th, 2008]
Urban planning is to Portland what sharia is to Riyadh—the answer for everything.
Last week, city officials kicked off their latest update to the Portland Plan, which will chart the city’s course for the next three decades. At least 10 city staff will work full-time on the three-year project, which will cost about $2 million next year.
How do the last big Portland plans—from 1972 and 1988—hold up? Pretty well, considering all that can change over decades. Aside from grumps like Cato Institute fellow Randal O’Toole, who believes “government planning always fails,” most consider Portland’s planners some of the best. But here’s where their crystal balls fell short:
1972
On TV: Fat Albert, Munich Olympics
Typical plan sentence: “Automobile traffic is noisy, smelly, and dangerous.”
Grade: B. Ambitious and concise. Hostile to cars and tall buildings.
GOALS:
• “Keep the Willamette River free of pollution.”
2008) River still full of shit. Fish still full of PCBs and mercury.
• “Reinforce the Oriental restaurant concentration along NW Fourth Avenue with additional entertainment facilities.”
2008) Are strip clubs “entertainment facilities”?
• Calls for major emphasis on public transit, and downtown “traffic-free” districts where private car traffic and on-street parking are “eliminated.”
2008) Cars are banned…during parades. This year’s Plan drafters call the transportation goals of 1972 “unrealistic.” Transit ridership is 50 percent lower than the 1972 goal.
1988
On TV: Matlock, Iran-Contra
Typical plan sentence: “These are aspirations for greatness, aspirations that, if adhered to, can be achieved. This is how great cities come into being.”
Grade: C. Less ambitious yet more grandiose. Made peace with cars and development.
GOALS:
• “Establish a World’s Fair committee.”
2008) Still time to bid for the 2020 Olympics.
• “Recognize that parking is an important element in the transportation system.”
2008) So much for 1972’s going “traffic-free.”
• “Provide year-round shelter for the homeless.”
2008) No—but we’ve got a 10-Year Plan for that, too.
• Develop “public restroom facilities such as pissoirs.”
2008) Not yet—but you can pee in City Hall after dark.
• Study “alternative fuels for transit.”
2008) TriMet still burns diesel. Some gas stations pump biofuels.
• Build a public aquarium as a major attraction.
2008) Go, Fish.
• Promote the growth of the brewing and distilling industries.
2008) Portland has 30 breweries—more than any city anywhere. Cheers!
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Best-Laid Plans”











