Ken Allen, Dan Clay, Tom Chamberlain
Look for the union label.
Table of Contents: | Hear The Ads
February 3rd, 2010
Clearwire | For a communications company, it doesn’t listen too well.8 comments
January 27th, 2010
Oregon School Activities Association | Stop spelling “T-E-A-M” With an “I.” 0 comments
January 13th, 2010
Schubert Flint Public Affairs | Prop. 8’s fear mongers return to Oregon for Measures 66 and 67.3 comments
January 6th, 2010
Associated Oregon Industries | Claiming free speech to stomp unions.3 comments
December 16th, 2009
Lewis & Clark | Trafficking in B.S.18 comments
December 9th, 2009
Port Of Portland | What’s a public agency got against peaceful dissent?1 comment
November 18th, 2009
Bureau Of Transportation | One more mouth to feed.12 comments
November 11th, 2009
Washington Co. DA’s Office | Abusing a domestic violence law.28 comments
November 4th, 2009
University Of Oregon | Who’s killing Rudolph?7 comments
October 28th, 2009
Metro | A blowhard answer to global warming? 6 comments
[May 27th, 2009]
We at the Rogue Desk can stomach an attack ad if it’s got some substance.
But this week’s roster of Rogues—Ken Allen, executive director of Oregon AFSCME Council 75; Dan Clay, president of Oregon UFCW Local 555; and Tom Chamberlain, president of Oregon AFL-CIO—don’t have all the facts on their side.
Last week, in a sure sign a healthcare reform bill from U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) faces an optimistic diagnosis in Congress, Allen, Clay and Chamberlain helped start a radio campaign attacking Wyden, who is typically an ally of labor.
It’s fine to disagree with Wyden. But Oregon’s senior senator is making an honest effort to tackle health care, and the unions are using scare tactics to derail him. Wyden’s proposal would change the tax code. Though the unions complain the proposal taxes health care for the middle class, it also creates a new tax deduction and subsidies that would save middle-class families money, Wyden says.
In 2006, an independent group found Wyden’s plan would save families earning up to $150,000 about $300 a year. (For more, see “Sicko and the Senator,” WW, July 11, 2007.) What it wouldn’t do is allow “Cadillac” healthcare plans to keep their current tax-free status. “If some unions want to negotiate for better health coverage than some members of Congress have, we respect their right to do so,” says Josh Kardon, Wyden’s chief of staff. “But Americans shouldn’t subsidize Cadillac health benefits for a wealthy few.”
Clay calls the ad “accurate.” Chamberlain says Wyden is creating a “smoke screen.”
Story continues below
advertisement
Meanwhile, the Rogue Desk hopes Wyden’s union attackers don’t screw up the debate as badly as the system we all want to reform.
^Hear The Ads
The Union AdsRon Wyden’s Response
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Ken Allen, Dan Clay, Tom Chamberlain”
After attending several meetings of the Oregon Health Fund Board last year as well as a panel discussion with executives from the top 6 Oregon health insurance companies one thing is clear: no one kn...
Bill clearly doesn't know the facts and figures about private health insurance (although he repeats a few industry talking points).
First, he is wrong that many private health ins...
It's not clear if Bill is an intentional or unintentional propagandist for the industry, or just motivated by personal economic interest or ideology. Nonetheless, his rebuttal demonstrates several pro...
The 80% figure for medical cost ratio figure comes from Do Not Resusciate: Why the Health Insurance Industry is Dyting and How we Must Replace it by John Geyman. Geyman takes his figures from, among o...
