Advertiser

 



INTERVIEW

Jeffrey St. Clair: Gore's No Green

BY NICK BUDNICK
nbudnick@wweek.com

 


Jeffrey St. Clair will be featured at a reading at
The Lucky Labrador Brewpub
(915 SE Hawthorne Blvd., 236-3555)
at 6 pm Sunday, Oct. 22,
sponsored by Larry Tuttle and the Center for Environmental Equity.

For the PBS news show Frontline's in-depth investigation of the pasts of Gore and Bush, including interviews with childhood friends and former colleagues, check out www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/choice2000.



For the first time in decades, polls show that the presidential beauty contest is a statistical toss-up. Many green-leaning voters who were flirting with Ralph are deciding that maybe Al isn't such a bad guy after all. Not Jeffrey St. Clair.

The Oregon City writer, a veteran of the Northwest's forest wars, authors a nationally syndicated column with California-based writer Alexander Cockburn for The Nation and other left-leaning periodicals. In September, the duo released a book, Al Gore: A User's Manual, a scathing portrait of Gore's flirtation with the Christian Right and miscellaneous corporate villainy.

St. Clair, who will read from the book next week in Portland, talked with reporter Nick Budnick about why he thinks enviros have nothing to gain from either major-party candidate.

Willamette Week: How do you reconcile Gore's liberal image with the record you lay out?

Jeffrey St. Clair: Well, Gore was tutored on the rhetoric of liberalism. His father, Al Sr., was one of FDR's lieutenants in the building of the New Deal--basically an honorable liberal Democrat. So Gore Jr. knows the rhetoric of liberalism. That is his greatest political gift, to be able to perpetrate almost with impunity a dual personality.

What's his real personality?

In his first campaign in 1976, Gore ran as a conservative Democrat: tough on crime, "Let's get over Vietnam syndrome".... He referred to homosexuals as "abnormal." Later, Gore and Clinton built a slate of issues on crime, welfare reform, immigration, cutting the budget. You can apply an almost Freudian analysis to Gore's career. Brick by brick, he was taking out the very foundation that his father helped build.

What's the story on welfare reform?

The Republicans didn't want Clinton to sign a welfare reform bill because they wanted to use that against him in 1996. Closing in on the '96 election, Dole and Gingrich pushed through a bill that was almost identical to ones that had been vetoed five times before. The White House commissioned a study that said this is going to make millions of kids go hungry. Clinton's top advisers said, "Mr. Clinton, you are way up in the polls, veto it." Gore says, "No, the Democrats may take control of the House, so this may be your last chance to sign welfare reform." Clinton signed it.

Where's the record of Gore's not being an environmentalist?

Where is the record of Al Gore being an environmentalist? His voting record in Congress was anemic: a 64-percent rating by the League of Conservation Voters. Here in the Northwest, under President Bush, we had an injunction on logging in ancient forests that was handed down by a Reagan-appointed judge in 1992. Within six months of getting elected, the Clinton administration came in and demanded that environmentalists relinquish the injunction. That was really the beginning of the end, and the chain saws have been going ever since. The first six months of the administration was one dizzying reversal after another. I remember when Jay Hair, who was CEO of the National Wildlife Federation, was asked, "How do you describe this new relationship?" And Jay Hair said, "Well, it's like date rape."

But isn't it better than what we'd get under a Republican administration?

We've all heard the threats that the Republicans are going to open up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska for oil drilling. What we don't hear is that Clinton-Gore already opened up the 24-million-acre National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska for oil drilling, which had not been exploited since 1917 when it was created. In 1994 Clinton and Gore signed an executive order that overturned the ban on the export of Alaskan crude oil. One of the big beneficiaries of that was ARCO, which has contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Democrats; it now can export that Alaskan oil to China, Japan, South Korea, the Far East. It's hypocrisy for Gore to say, "I'm fighting for the little guy to keep home heating oil prices low in the Midwest," when he's had a big hand in overturning one of the fail-safe mechanisms on oil prices. My friend David Brower [longtime director of the Sierra Club] says that Clinton and Gore in eight years have done more harm to the environment than Reagan and Bush did in 12 years. It's not because they're more to the right than Reagan and Bush, it's because when Clinton and Gore were elected, the public interest groups swallowed their pride and their principles for reasons of political expediency.

How have we been hurt in Oregon?

Well, I don't think there's much chance of Gore losing Oregon or Washington or winning the state of Idaho. So he could take the principled stand on salmon policy. His federal biologists and the EPA have told him the only solution to saving these salmon runs is to breach the dams on the Snake River. So Gore's response is, "We're going to put together a salmon summit." The delay is going to spell extinction.

Isn't your book just a call to vote for Nader?

It's not a call to vote for Nader, but I think progressives ought to vote for Nader. If you vote for Gore, you shouldn't be suffering under any illusions about what this man stands for. One vote for Nader is worth a hundred votes for Gore, because if Nader gets 5 percent it's going to mean that federal money's going to kick in to build the Green Party as an effective force across the country.

If you had to cast a vote for either Gore or Bush, who would you support?

My inclination would be to vote for Bush, for this reason: It would energize the opposition.

If liberals heed your advice, they'll help Bush get elected.

Al Gore has voted for the death penalty at every opportunity. We're told you've got to vote for Gore because of Roe vs. Wade--but he's got an 84-percent pro-life voting record. You look at what it means to be a liberal or a progressive and I think you'll find very few areas where Gore is on your side.

What are those?

I don't know, you tell me. We looked for them, we really did. One of our colleagues asked, "Can't you find anything nice to say about Al Gore?" My response was, "Yeah, he doesn't like golf."

We have young people marching in the streets risking police violence, yet they don't bother to vote.

I think we fetishize the voting booth. I'm very excited about the political activism of kids on campus. Look at the work that's been done by anti-sweatshop groups. It really is an almost global movement on their part. If you look at the most exciting thing that's happened in the United States in the last decade, it would have to be the uprising in Seattle over the WTO, about these free-trade deals which are sticking it down the throats of working people and the environment and human rights. I think these kids know more about street theater, about politics, about the way the global economy works than I did at their age. I'm inspired by that.

 


Portland Travel Specials!

 

 

 

search site rogue of the week scoreboard news buzz 500 words News Stories Lead Story feedback site map search site personals classified webxtra culture news search site feature Q & A