Advertiser

 
Freed Form
In the next two weeks, two choreographers from opposite sides of the cutting edge land in Portland. Both ride in on a comet of critical acclaim.
That's where the similarities end.

BY CATHERINE THOMAS
243-2122 EXT 353

Open House 01
Portland Institute for Contemporary Art presents Wally Cardona Quartet

Portland State University, Lincoln Hall Auditorium, 1620 SW Park Ave., 242-1419
8 pm Friday-Saturday, Jan. 21-22. $13-$16.


Catapult: La Comedie Humaine
White Bird presents Diavolo Dance Theater
Arlene Schnitzer Concert Hall, 1037 SW Broadway, 224-8499.
7:30 pm Wednesday, Jan. 26. $15.50-$29


In the modern dance galaxy, the word "experimental" encompasses many forms. As the Portland dance season gears up, local presenters PICA and White Bird are eschewing the conventional in favor of two experimental--and highly divergent--architects of movement.

Wally Cardona creates dance so tense that it can resemble kinetic rapture or the writhing of the damned. The tension arises from paradox: In Cardona's conceptual universe, bodies wage wars of internal friction. A dancer straining upward is simultaneously collapsing. Heaving, spitting bodies battle moments of sculpted, majestic grace. Tempos alternate in discordant rhythms. Time stretches; even stillness crackles. Cardona is a master of optical illusion: You know the movement you're watching is internally propelled, yet the dancers appear buffeted by external forces beyond their control.

Jacques Heim's Diavolo Dance Theater is an altogether different spectacle. Eleven hyperkinetic performers ski down stairs and dance like furious demons on any structure that can hold them--cages, pipes, doors. Seemingly perilous vaults bisect the brink of physical jeopardy.

While both companies share a vehement physicality, they are as distinctive as their directors. Jacques Heim has rejected the personal in his work; Wally Cardona embraces it. Heim reconceptualizes movement in terms of external architecture; Cardona creates movement rooted in internal contradiction, composing irreconcilable situations for his dancers to maneuver.

Cardona was classically trained at Juilliard and danced for the modern iconoclast Ralph Lemon. He founded Wally Cardona Quartet two and a half years ago.

"The initial thrust behind Open House was a reaction to my training," the 34-year-old New Yorker told WW recently. "My history in dance was about display. At Juilliard, you trained in classical ballet and Graham and Limón, two very traditional modern techniques. Even Cunningham was too radical for them."

Cardona's early training shows in his rigor and meticulous form, but his nonconformist sensibility is pure Cunningham: Catalyzed by the unpredictable and devoted to a new dance idiom.

The 35-year-old Heim earned his creds as a theater artist on the streets of his native Paris, performing on cars and in subways, and later in clubs.

"I was bored, so I started a street theater group called Artichoke, experimenting with weird scenes," Heim says. "Everywhere we could perform, we were doing it. I knew nothing about dance. I had an opportunity to come to America, took a movement class and fell in love with dance. It changed my view on theater. I discovered that I could use movement instead of words. In the streets, I was interested in structures and architectures. I still retain those elements of improvisation and collaboration with Diavolo. When we create, what comes first is the set. The dancers improvise on the structures, and I put it together like a puzzle."

Heim's latest work, Catapult: La Comedie Humaine, is thematically oriented around a piece of furniture, the ubiquitous couch. The "easy chairs" are transformed through the course of the work into structures resembling ferris wheels and trampolines. The couch becomes fodder for ambitious bodily manipulation and a metaphor for human relationships.

As Diavolo's acrobatic dancers hurtle and clash with their physical environment, Cardona and his dancers dig trenches into the subconscious chasm. Ironically, Cardona's choreography is often perceived as "natural" and Heim's as "risky." Each insists that the opposite is true.

"Sometimes I say I'm going to make an easy piece--it always ends up turning into some kind of monster," Cardona says. "I tend to work within an extreme range. In one of the pieces we're doing in Portland, Blood Variations, I create situations which demand a great amount of willpower and physical rigor. I'll put two people in a situation and ask them to do movement that's big, expansive and moves all over the place, and then ask them to only do it in close proximity to each other. Or with a movement phrase that's built on momentum, I'll ask a dancer to take all the momentum out of it, which is basically unnatural. That's what I find interesting. Dancing on an edge is built into the work. You're not pretending. What the dancers are doing is alive."

Heim, for his part, insists that his company's acrobatics only appear to be risky. "It's so funny when you take something out of context, like skiing on stairs," he says. "People will say that's really dangerous. Actually, it's less dangerous than snowboarding. In the beginning, I was creating pieces with an element of risk, but not because I wanted to be dangerous. I wanted to have a group that was there for each other, a sense of community. When I catch someone, the person can trust me that they are going to fly and be caught."

Despite their disparate aesthetics, the two converge in their diagnosis on the state of modern dance.

"A lot of modern dance companies do beautiful work," says Heim. "But for me, modern dance is like Latin. It's a dead language. I go see ballet, and it's like looking at history, going to the museum and seeing Van Gogh. Modern dance is like this now. Abstract movement doesn't do it anymore for me. I needed for the human body to have a different experience. I think that's why I have to use the element of structure, and how it is evolving and affecting the human body."

Cardona agrees. "In dance, it very easily can become only about the display, and there is no doing," he says. "If you're just doing the ritual perfectly and there's no playfulness involved, some unknown element, then it's powerless. It's pointless. I'm not interested in showing the world as it is. I'm showing a world that you dream of, something that is going to shake people's lives up, stimulate them, get them to realize there's more possible."


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Willamette Week | originally published January 26, 2000

 

Portland Travel Specials!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

feedback site map search site personals classified webxtra culture news search site play dish screen visual arts music performance feature