bias cut


Advertiser

 

Lame dot-com beauty site is coming for you!


BY LIZ BROWN
243-2122

Photo by Steven Lane


Great Fashions of the Forties

This fashion show--featuring vintage ensembles and "renovated" fashions by local artists, hors d'oeuvres, wine and door prizes--is a fund-raiser for the renovation of the Maryhill Museum of Art.

Embassy Suites Hotel, Queen Marie Ballroom, 319 SW Pine St., (509) 773-3733. 7 pm Thursday, July 20. $35 advance, $50 at the door.


Is the broad array of beauty booty at local drug and department stores just not enough to meet your personal needs? Do you feel unfulfilled after sudsing your tresses with a favorite Aveda shampoo? Has Revlon somehow overlooked your perfect shade of red in its countless formulations?

I didn't think so.

But household goods behemoth Proctor & Gamble is banking on the notion that women do, indeed, want something more--specifically, custom-tailored beauty products from reflect.com, an Internet offshoot P&G launched last September. According to a July 10 article in the business section of The New York Times, the company is sinking $3 million to $5 million into an ad campaign promoting reflect.com for the third quarter.

Considering that online skin care and cosmetics retailers such as Beauty.com (not to mention "e-tailers" in general) are disappearing faster than a fresh coat of mascara in a downpour, P&G's confidence is befuddling. But, as company mouthpieces assured Times reporter Stuart Elliott, reflect.com has something unique--and potentially profitable--to offer women shoppers.

Are you sitting down? Get this: Customers can have hair care, skin care and cosmetics custom-formulated based on their answers to questions posted on the website. Then, products are shipped (free of charge) to shoppers' homes, complete with personalized labels (i.e., "Tina's shampoo"). Apparently, the site's "whimsical" illustrations and cutesy messages (like "Active ingredient: You") are projected to score points with beauty mavens, too.

Don't get me wrong--I like to slather a rich cream cleanser onto my face at the end of the day. I appreciate nice lip gloss. And I've spent plenty of time hovering over the MAC counter at Nordstrom. But this whole reflect.com gimmick strikes me as absurd. Who wants to buy products they can't try on first? Even if having my name on a bottle of toner were, for some unimaginable reason, important to my identity, I'd make my own label before I'd pay someone to do it for me in the guise of "personalized service."


Eventually, I got to enter my name (I chose "Asshole"), which soon appeared on a virtual foundation bottle label ("Asshole's foundation").

Despite my irritation with this whole concept, the investigative urge got the best of me. I visited the site.

The main page features a picture of a naked woman with an image of a giant flower superimposed on her back (note to marketing directors: ads that associate women with flowers are notoriously off the mark). I plowed through tedious introductory messages (whimsical illustrations take a helluva long time to download), meanwhile learning that I could use this revolutionary service to "while away the hours" dreaming up a wish list of every beauty product imaginable. Just what every busy woman needs!

Eventually, I got to enter my name (I chose "Asshole"), which soon appeared on a virtual foundation bottle label ("Asshole's foundation"). That's where the fun ended. The registration page was cumbersome, and when I finally got to the questionnaire and clicked on my answer to the first question about wardrobe choices, absolutely nothing happened. I had hit a roadblock (after having trouble even getting this far on the site earlier in the day), with nowhere to turn for help. Twenty minutes into my customized shopping adventure, I was stymied.

In the time it took to get this far on the site, I could have walked to Fred Meyer and chosen from myriad brands of tried-and-true beauty products, or driven to Escential Lotions & Oils to have a moisturizer mixed with my favorite essential oils with the help of a friendly, knowledgeable humanoid. Hell, I could have mixed my own potion from the contents of my medicine cabinet in the time that it would, theoretically, take to order--let alone receive--the goddamn goods here. I signed off, vowing never to return.

Reflecting on my reflect.com misadventure, I'm convinced that P&G should stick to peddling impersonal yet beloved products like Oil of Olay and Pantene Pro-V. Or at least that company strategists should spend less time in marketing meetings and more time observing how women actually shop. My experience at the site was hardly "interactive," and it was far from "personal." The lo-tech "computer" consultations at Clinique counters that were available more than a decade ago were far more helpful than this newfangled bull. For now, I'll stick to interacting with real live people who will answer my questions and help me choose products when I seek their help (you know, it's called personal service). Or maybe I'll coat the inside of my wrist in 10 red lipsticks at the Revlon display and buy one on the spot without anyone's help at all. Now that's user-friendly.

 

 

Portland Travel Specials!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

feedback site map search site personals classified webxtra culture news shop search site play dish screen visual arts music performance feature