rectrectrectrectrectrectrectrectrectrectrectrectrect
Picture

Site Navigator
Personals
Classified
How to Reach Us
Web Directory
Cool Sites of the Week
Archive
Home
News:
Cover: Radio Racket
NewsBuzz
Murmurs: Pols on Parade
Lemon for a car
Willamette watershed
Rogue of the Week
Winners/Losers
Letters
Opinion: Randy Miller
King-56 crash stories
Arts & Culture:
Shinola: Things We Like
Beer: The High Season
General Events
Food/Drink Events
Restaurants
Music:
Timbre: music column
Music Calendar
Capsule Reviews
Rock: The Champs
Rock: Richard Davies
Classical: Evocations
Movies:
Capsule Reviews
Nightwatch
City of Angels
Men With Guns
Performance:
Listings
Stage: Indiscretions
Books:
Listings
Review: The Meadowlands
Photographer’s Portfolio:
Michael Olfert

Picture

Photo: MELISSA GERR

Picture
Picture

Would you like fries with that verdict?
 
When lawyer Karen Steele gave up a career in one of Portland's most prominent defense firms to marry convicted killer Frank Gable, most of the legal community thought she had lost her mind. Court documents suggest her legal integrity has since fallen apart, as well.

In 1991, Steele married the man convicted of killing Oregon Department of Corrections Director Michael Francke, a decision that earned her widespread ridicule. Fifteen months later, Steele, who now has a private practice in Salem, was one of two lawyers appointed to represent Gregory Paul Wilson, who was accused of murdering Misty Largo, a homeless 19-year-old living in Portland.

Picture

Illustration: KERI ROSEBRAUGH

In separate trials, juries sentenced Wilson and Grant Charboneau to death for their roles in the murder plot. But prosecutors have had trouble making the convictions stick. In 1996, the state Supreme Court threw out the two death sentences because the trial judge improperly admitted evidence. Retrials on the murder charges are scheduled for later this year.

Meanwhile, Wilson is trying to get his lesser convictions--kidnapping, assault and abuse of a corpse--overturned by arguing that his legal defense was inadequate.

 In a legal argument filed in late February, Wilson's new attorneys claim Steele lacked the experience required to represent clients in death penalty cases. Under state statute, all lawyers appointed to represent indigent clients in death penalty trials must, among other things, have five years' experience trying major felonies and must provide the names of judges and prominent criminal lawyers who will vouch for their abilities.

According to court filings, Steele fails on both counts.

She was admitted to the bar in 1987, barely five years before being appointed to represent Wilson, and spent her first year handling misdemeanors, not major felonies, according to Wilson's appeals attorneys, William David Falls and Richard L. Wolf. In addition, after she married Gable, she lost her job and temporarily waited tables in a Salem restaurant.

Furthermore Wolf and Falls say they contacted all but one of her references, and none would vouch for her. "All of the lawyers on her list held the opinion that she was either not qualified for appointment to a capital case, or they did not know her well enough to make that judgment," Falls and Wolf argue.

Steele, who divorced Gable late last year, says Falls and Wolf are mistaken. "I did follow the state guidelines and I did not list anybody as a reference that I didn't obtain their permission first," Steele told WW.

Ann Christian, the head of the state Indigent Defense Services, says her office may look into the matter but not until after Wilson's retrial. --Maureen O'Hagan

 

Correction:
In last week's cover story ("Micro Blues," WW, April 8, 1998), the sentence on page 31 reading "The company has used its clout to 'encourage' beer distributors to carry any non-Anheuser-Busch beers on their trucks" should have said "not to carry." Also, in the charts on page 27, the sales figures for Full Sail and BridgePort for the years 1996 and 1997 have been reversed.

WW regrets the errors.

Dredging Up the Future
 
A Cincinnati footwear maker has indirectly kicked the Port of Portland where it hurts.

U.S. Shoe convinced the U.S. Supreme Court on March 31 to toss out a decade-old tax that required exporters to pay 12.5 cents for every $100 of goods shipped out of the country. Although U.S. Shoe doesn't export from Portland, the impact of its legal victory will be felt here.

Picture

ACKROYD PHOTOGRAPHY

The money raised by the tax has been used to operate and maintain harbors. One of the nation's biggest ports, Portland is also one of the most reliant on the money raised by the export tax receipts. Each year the Army Corps of Engineers spends up to $20 million of that cash dredging local shipping channels--including the Willamette and Columbia rivers.

Dredging is the process by which the rivers are cleared of silt and other debris that clog them up. As container vessels get bigger, maintaining channels at the required 40-foot depth is crucial. Without regular dredging, ships can't get to Portland. "It's not a crisis now, but it could become one," says Tom Decker, the port's manager of government relations.

Currently, there's roughly $1 billion in the export tax kitty nationwide, so dredging funds won't be cut immediately. But Decker says companies that paid the tax during the past decade want their money back. The Supreme Court left unresolved how much of the $1 billion must be returned; however, big local shippers such as Willamette Industries and Weyerhauser will probably want refunds.

Port officials say finding a new way to finance dredging will be complicated. Meanwhile, spring runoffs will continue to deposit silt on the bottom of the Willamette and Columbia rivers. "If there's no new user fee," Decker says, "then the situation becomes much more threatening." --Nigel Jaquiss

Follow-up:
Raising Scores

Portland School Board member Marc Abrams is too short to be much of a front-court scoring threat, but he's got a fast first move. The day after he read in Willamette Week that prep athletes in Portland can play with a .71 GPA ("The Education of Brandon Brooks," WW, March 4, 1998), Abrams e-mailed board members suggesting higher requirements. Earlier this week he asked that his proposal be added to the agenda of the March 23 school board meeting.

Abrams' suggestion is that Portland high schoolers maintain a cumulative 2.5 GPA and get at least a 2.0 in the semester prior to playing. Those requirements are similar to NCAA standards. "I understand the value of athletics," Abrams says, "but if we're just keeping kids in school and they're not learning, that's a failure." Board chairman Ron Saxton had earlier requested that school administrators come up with high standards; Abrams hopes his proposal will jump start the process. The bottom line, Abrams says, is that changes must be made: "We have a policy--it's simply inadequate." --Nigel Jaquiss

 

Originally published: Willamette Week - April 15, 1998

ÿ