file:///Sangfroid/#Web%20Pages/pages-archive/Advertiser

 


FOLLOW-UP: GREEN ACRES

In Land We Trust
Metro's nonprofit partner in its green space program is taking good care of itself while it takes care of the earth, funding operations not through contributions but profits from its sales.

BY NICK BUDNICK
nbudnick@wweek.com

photo by Basil Childers

Kim Lathrop, a former land surveyor, says Metro paid the Trust for Public Lands too much for Willamette Cove, a picturesque but polluted North Portland riverside site. "This is a heavy-use industrial site with an unknown past," Lathrop says.

 

Earlier this month a WW cover story outlined several other questionable land acquisitions by Metro's open-space program ("Green Acres," WW, Feb. 2, 2000). Last week, we analyzed Metro's response to the article ("About Space").

 

In 1996, TPL offered to sell Jenne Butte to Metro for $2.2 million. Metro's staff appraiser valued the Gresham hilltop at $1.5 million. According to TPL's 1999 tax return, the group had revenue of $105 million last year. TPL's top-paid staffer made $168, 851. Vice president, Bowen Blair Jr. made $92,950.

 

Beck to Beck: Metro's dealings with Lucille Beck and her son, Legislator Chris Beck.

In 1995, it looked like a match made in political heaven.

Metro wanted to pass a ballot measure to fund open space. So the Trust for Public Lands went out and bought options to purchase several high-profile natural areas that starred in campaign literature as the return on a "yes" vote. The national green group also contributed $15,000 and gave employee Jim Desmond a paid leave of absence so he could volunteer for the campaign.

The teamwork won the day, as the measure garnered 62 percent voter approval.

Since then, Metro has used its bond measure to buy, among other things, seven pieces of land from TPL. (Desmond now runs the program for Metro.)

It was always envisioned that nonprofits, and particularly the Trust for Public Lands, would be a big player in Metro's green-space program. TPL's primary mission is the preservation of open space. Unlike most environmental groups, however, the bulk of its revenue does not come from membership dues and monetary contributions. Instead, the group acquires land that is likely to be targeted for government acquisition, then sells it to public agencies at prices that cover costs--or, in some cases, generate profit to subsidize other transactions.

For Metro, a government trying to buy land for parks and open spaces, partnership with TPL has many benefits: Unencumbered by bureaucracy, the group can quickly buy properties as they become available. In addition, the group presents another face to potential sellers who might distrust government--or view it as a cash cow. Once potential sellers know government is interested in their land, "they just think, 'Deep pockets,'" says former Gresham Mayor Gussie McRobert. With TPL, though, "they never know who's dealing with them."

Best of all, because a donation of land to a nonprofit can provide the donor with a tax writeoff, "Purchase through a nonprofit land-preservation organization may enable the program to secure land at below market rates," the Metro Council stated in its resolution to put the $135.6 million ballot measure before voters.

Five years later, some of the promises have come true. In several cases the nonprofit has played a key role in helping Metro save land from development. But that last benefit--getting land at below market value--has never panned out when TPL was involved, according to Metro's own records.

In 1996, the first year of the green-space program, Kris Hartley was Metro's appraisal watchdog, making sure that sellers weren't overcharging taxpayers. Three properties under TPL option were considered for Metro purchase under her watch, and "every one of them occurred controversially."

Overall, Metro records show, in four cases TPL provided Metro with its own appraisals, which Metro judged to have inflated the value of the land.

In most of those cases, Metro refused to pay TPL's initial asking price. But not always--as demonstrated by Willamette Cove, the first property Metro acquired from TPL.

In 1995, the riverbank site was one of 12 properties that Metro said it would acquire if voters approved the green-space ballot measure. Willamette Cove was advertised in a special leaflet to North Portland voters as "one of the last natural coves on the Willamette River" and would be developed as a park.

In 1994, in anticipation of the bond measure's passage, TPL purchased an option on Willamette Cove from its owner, the Portland Development Commission.

PDC had struggled to sell the 27 acres. Though picturesque, the property has two major drawbacks. First, the cove has long been an industrial site and is home to contamination that still has not been fully assessed. Second, it is just downstream of McCormick & Baxter, a heavily contaminated Superfund site that came to people's attention in 1988 when two children wading in the river suffered chemical burns.

In January 1993, PDC secured a promise from the state Department of Environmental Quality that neither it nor successive owners would be held liable for contamination leaking from the adjacent site. Nevertheless, one month later, a tentative deal for the bulk of the land at $19,000 an acre fell through due to concerns over McCormick & Baxter. A city memo that month said the neighboring site's toxics "jeopardize our ability to sell the site."

In 1996, TPL bought the site for $785,000 and that same day sold it to Metro for $854,000, more than $31,000 an acre.

Metro defends the purchase by pointing to a TPL appraisal that valued the land at that price, as well as a consultant's study saying that despite some contamination on the site, it wasn't expected to pose "unacceptable health risks" to future park-users.

In purchasing the land, however, Metro ignored the concerns of an appraiser it hired to review the TPL appraisal. William Eadie's review, a copy of which Metro provided to WW, said that regardless of the DEQ's promise, the land's market value was nevertheless likely to be affected by the Superfund site next door. He expressed concern that the TPL appraisal valued Willamette Cove as comparable to properties where contamination wasn't an issue, and assumed, improbably, that the Superfund site would not reduce Willamette Cove's market value.

"In my opinion, purchasers of sites situated adjacent to...sites with known contamination are generally concerned about the proximity of such a site, both as to future contamination risk as well as to impacts upon the value of the site," Eadie wrote. "Therefore, the appraisal may not fully meet the [appraisal rule] which requires consideration of these types of issues."

Eadie warned that his approval of TPL's appraised value was contingent upon further research and "the successful resolution of the questions raised in this review."

Desmond, who became head of the Metro open-space program in October 1995, admits that no further work was done to satisfy Eadie's concerns. But he and his staff nevertheless defend the price. "That was a low price for industrial land," said Nancy Chase, one of several negotiators overseen by Desmond.

While PDC was pleased by its dealings with TPL, Carole Hebb was not.

In early 1996, the recently widowed Hebb wanted to sell off her husband's property holdings. Among those was a one-quarter share of a 58-acre parcel of wetlands near Wilsonville that was coveted by TPL. The two co-owners of the property had already donated their shares of the land to TPL, claiming the value as a tax writeoff.

Hebb says she met several times with TPL's regional vice president, Bowen Blair Jr., about selling her share, and he repeatedly pressured her to give TPL the land for free. "He was trying to push me," she said. Her land-use consultant, Ben Altman, agreed, likening TPL's style to "Microsoft strong-arm tactics."

Blair denies bullying Hebb. "She wasn't forced to sell to us or to anyone," he says. "She negotiated hard for the property, and so did we."

In the end, Hebb held out for $20,000 cash and a tax write-off.

Not long after acquiring the land, TPL offered it to Metro for $231,000. Metro's Hartley judged that figure to be inflated and reduced the value by $61,000. TPL criticized Hartley's analysis but agreed to Metro's $170,000 offer--not a bad return for a $20,000 investment.

Just as it did in Portland with Metro's appraisal reviewers, TPL's focus on the bottom line has at times gotten the group in hot water with government fiscal watchdogs at the federal level as well.

In 1992, for instance, a report by the U.S. Department of Interior inspector general said that TPL had unduly profited on six land transactions across the United States. In one deal, TPL made $200,000 off an option it had purchased for $1,000. In another, a government curator accused TPL of inflating land value by $434,000.

Ives, for her part, does not deny making a profit on those deals, but she says the government benefited, too. "The six transactions reviewed in the audit we accomplished at a $2.2 million savings in land value to the agencies involved, and hundreds of thousands of dollars saved in staff and administrative costs."


Beck to Beck

In the list of Metro's purchases from the Trust for Public Lands, one name stands out: Lucille Beck, the mother of the best-known TPL staffer in Oregon, Chris Beck, who rode his green credentials to the Legislature in 1996.

On Nov. 21, 1997, TPL exercised an option on 28 acres owned by Lucille Beck and her sister-in-law, Carolyn Smith, outside Wilsonville, then sold it to Metro for its appraised value of $270,000. TPL paid Beck the full $270,000. In exchange for the group's help, she says, she contributed a small percentage of the price.

The purchase was not unusual for Metro, as the land was in one of the agency's open-space target areas, the Tonquin Geological Basin. Rep. Chris Beck says his mother got no special treatment. "I made a point of not being involved with that transaction," he says. His mother agrees, saying, "I don't think that would have been cricket."

Although the land's appraisal assumed it was developable for one homesite, Lucille Beck told WW that the land would have been difficult to build on due to the large amount of wetlands and the power lines traversing the property. "We had tried to get a nurseryman to take a look at it," she says, "but he wasn't interested."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Willamette Week | originally published February 16, 2000

file:///Sangfroid/#Web%20Pages/pages-archive/Portland%20Travel%20Specials! Phys Ed: guide to a better body

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

search site rogue of the week scoreboard news buzz 500 words News Stories Lead Story feedback site map search site personals classified webxtra culture news