Advertiser






Screen

REVIEW
End of Career? Please?
Arnold battles Satan in End of Days.
Don't be surprised if you root for the Devil.


BY DAVE MCCOY
dmccoy@wweek.com

End of Days
Rated R
Now showing

Forget the millennium and Y2K and the end of the world--the more immediate question is this: Who's going to save us from another Arnold Schwarzenegger movie? Obviously, the only person who doesn't understand how ridiculous it is watching a thick-lipped, noticeably paunchy 52-year-old action has-been run around in tank-tops trying to save the world (again) is Schwarzenegger himself. Ah-nold simply refuses to drift off into cinematic obscurity with dignity, and it's both embarrassing and sad. Think of watching your drunken dad pick a fight at a family picnic and you get the idea.

Of course, if you're Schwarze-negger, what else can you do? The "actor" has had years to learn his craft and still knows only one or two facial expressions and reads lines like his jaw's been wired shut. If he doesn't have a gun in his hand, he's lost. But at this point in his career, not even that comfort works for poor Arnie. His last two action films--both critically maligned--did moderate (Eraser) to terrible (Batman and Robin) business. Schwarzenegger's last action hit was 1994's True Lies. Now, after a too-brief absence from the screen, he's back to cash in on millennial paranoia with End of Days. Bombastic, obnoxious, tediously long and dull, and just plain stupid (even for a Schwarzenegger movie), End of Days possibly ranks as the weathered superstar's worst film. It takes itself so seriously that it's not even bad enough to be trashy fun. Schwarzenegger may have found one more way to save humanity, but after this turd, it's doubtful that he can save his own career.

According to the production notes, End of Days originated as a film pitch. Screenwriter Andrew W. Marlowe (Air Force One) came up with the idea of Schwarzenegger battling Satan at the end of the century and pitched the idea without a script. Schwarzenegger, who's exhausted all possible earthly adversaries, signed on blindly. Watching End of Days, it makes perfect sense that the movie was derived from a single, dollar-sign-inspired gimmick. Though director/cinematographer Peter Hyams (The Relic, Sudden Death) dresses up this premise with numerous explosions, special effects, blood and gore, an arsenal of weapons, and muddled theology and mysticism, he can't hide the fact that End of Days doesn't contain even one original idea. From The Omen to Rosemary's Baby to Day of the Beast to even Ah-nold's own Terminator series, End of Days shamelessly rips off every device Marlowe or Hyams can remember.

Presumably after watching Lethal Weapon, Marlowe came up with this persona for Schwarzeneg-ger: Jericho Cane, a drunken, tormented ex-cop whose wife and daughter were murdered years ago because he wasn't around to protect them. When we meet Cane, he's about ready to put a bullet in his skull. We should be so lucky. Sadly, his security-guard partner, Chicago (Kevin Pollak, who provides the only intentional comic relief in the film), interrupts him and, through a series of hilariously awful action sequences, they begin unraveling a case in which a bunch of priests are trying to kill a 20-year-old woman named Christine York (Robin Tunney, all mouth a-gaping and breasts a-dangling). You see, when Christine was born, she was chosen by Satan to conceive his child when he returned on the eve of the millennium. Twenty years later, the horny Devil--or, as the End of Days press kit deems him, "The Man"--has returned, in the form of a dapper Wall Street executive played with great relish by Gabriel Byrne (the only actor who appears to understand the load of dung he's stepped into). You can figure out where this goes from here.

There's so much wrong with End of Days that it's difficult to pick a critical starting point. Marlowe may have stolen his ideas from other movies, but he clearly doesn't understand the formula for an entertaining Schwarzenegger film. The key is to develop Arnold's character motivations but make him say as little as possible. Marlowe not only fails to develop any character in the film, he gives the mush-mouthed actor twice as much dialogue as he's had in all of his action films combined. Lines like "I know what I heard" come out like "Uh knu wha uh hurk." Even sillier, Marlowe decides to try his hand at subtext: Through blatantly obvious symbolism, he turns Schwarzeneg-ger into a Christ figure. He's exiled and crucified, playing the role like a martyr with a Glock. Well, if Schwarzenegger can get pregnant (Junior), I suppose Hyams and Marlowe felt he could be the Messiah.

None of this character or plot stuff really matters to "Hack" Hyams, though. Coming from the Michael Bay school of sledgehammer aesthetics (The Rock, Armageddon), Hyams is only concerned with big boom boom. He's a director who revels in excess: He can't just blow up one van; he takes out an entire city block, shot from two or three different angles. Fireballs follow Schwarzenegger and Tunney wherever they go. He shoots entire action sequences in close-up, then edits them together into disorienting, headache-inducing fragments in hopes that audiences won't have time to think. By the finale, you won't care whether Arnold saves the world or not, because burning in hell might be a better option than seeing another film by Schwarzenegger or Hyams.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Willamette Week | originally published December 1, 1999

 

Portland%20Travel%20Specials!
 

 

search site play dish screen visual arts music performance feature feedback site map search site personals classified webxtra culture news