Earlier this month, The Oregonian announced an online partnership with nine organizations to provide news, blogs and features through the newspaper’s website.
The new Oregonian
News Network, the paper said, features links to news sites that offer
“quality local independent reporting.” These include MyEugene.org, the
city’s “first community-driven news site”; the website for The Skanner, one of Oregon’s oldest African-American-owned newspapers; and the Lund Report, a well-respected healthcare news site.
But some critics say
one partner, Oregon Capitol News, raises questions about the newspaper’s
promise that its partners are truly independent.
Oregon Capitol News
is paid for and run by the Cascade Policy Institute, a Libertarian think
tank. Founded in 1991, Cascade espouses low taxes and small government,
and “promotes property rights, incentives, markets and decentralized
decision-making,” its website says.
Oregon Capitol News,
which has a staff of three, publishes news stories from Salem that look
at a wide range of political issues, including some that Cascade Policy
Institute lobbies on. The website also has a number of useful databases,
including some that list the salaries and benefits of public officials.
Scott Moore, of the union-backed advocacy group Our Oregon, first pointed to a disconnect between the guidelines The Oregonian established for its news partners and the choice of Oregon Capitol News.
“The Oregonian
appears to be breaking its own rules,” Moore wrote on Our Oregon’s blog
May 9. “The guidelines for prospective members of the Oregonian News
Network explicitly say ‘organs for institutions such as government
agencies, political parties, non-profits’ don’t qualify.’”
Cascade President John Charles told WW
his organization’s donors asked his group to establish Oregon Capitol
News in response to the dwindling number of news reporters in the state.
At the same time,
Charles maintains that the Oregon Capitol News blog is independent. “We
don’t exercise day-to-day oversight,” Charles says. “I suggest stories
to them occasionally, but I am more likely to be quoted in Willamette Week
than in Oregon Capitol News.” Cascade says it’s committed to
transparency in government, though Charles would not identify who is
underwriting Oregon Capitol News.
Chuck Sheketoff, director of the left-leaning Oregon Center for Public Policy, says The Oregonian
is lending its credibility to an organization with a clear political
agenda. “Oregon Capitol News is merely ‘a project of’ and not
independent of Cascade Policy Institute, and Cascade takes advocacy
positions on the issues that Oregon Capitol News writes about,”
Sheketoff says.
Oregonian
Editor Peter Bhatia disagrees. “I respect Chuck, but he couldn’t be more
wrong about OCN, based on what I’m reading,” Bhatia wrote WW in
an email response to questions. “Their stories are straightforward,
simple news reporting and reflect no bias that I can detect. He’s
looking for a problem that doesn’t exist.”
During the 2010
election, however, Oregon Capitol News published campaign interviews
with legislative candidates from only one party—the GOP. A May 5 story
on increased greenhouse gas regulation didn’t mention that a Cascade
executive had testified against the bill. A May 18 story on a bill to
make tax credits more transparent didn’t note Cascade’s testimony in
favor of it.
Bhatia says The Oregonian’s
views about its partners could change. “We’ll watch OCN as we do all
the original partners,” Bhatia says. “Our purpose is to help these sites
gain audience and to broaden the range of news available on
OregonLive.com.”
Tom Goldstein, a UC Berkeley journalism professor, says it’s too soon to judge The Oregonian’s experiment. He said the situation is analogous to the broadcast network Al Jazeera (owned by the state of Qatar) or The Washington Times (owned for many years by the Unification Church).
“If over a period of time Oregon Capitol News or Al Jazeera or The Washington Times
carries credible news reports, then the issue of ownership fades into
the background,” Goldstein says. “Al Jazeera seems to pass the
credibility test much of the time, The Washington Times passes sometimes.”
Sheketoff says it would be just as misleading if the daily presented his group’s work as unbiased.
“I’d welcome The Oregonian publishing all of our news releases and reports,” he says. “But I’d never ask the editor of the paper to claim [our site] is ‘independent journalism.’”
"But some critics say one partner, Oregon Capitol News, raises questions about the newspaper’s promise that its partners are truly independent."
By truly independent, you naturally mean "left wing and liberal"? Correct?
John Charles claims that the Oregon Capitol News blog is independent of Cascade Policy Institute, but Sarah Ross, the blog's Political Reporter, is also currently listed on Cascade Policy Institute's own website as a staff Policy Analyst.
Using Bhatia's analogy, that would strike me as if, say, Al Jaeera were to claim independence while its chief correspondent were also serving in a country's information ministry. Not very reassuring, IMHO.
Peter Bhatia said "Their stories are straightforward, simple news reporting and reflect no bias that I can detect". Peter, do you read the Oregonian? CPI is obviously a mouthpiece and front for the Oil and Banking Industry. Make CPI donors (for the interns as well - Koch funded!) open their books! You are really a great "detect"ive, Mr Editor. FAIL!
Your article is misleading and lacks any backing. It is obvious you have some bias against the online paper. You did not even contact the OCN. Let's not look to judge others on their journalism if you cannot even follow up on a story properly.
The Oregonian is also partnering with the website nothcoastoregon.com, based in Astoria. This is a terrible right wing rag that only occasionally masquerades as journalism. They mostly do little more than reprint press releases, and their 'coverage' of the controversial LNG issue in Clatsop County was so one sided it could not be taken seriously. They demonstrated they were little more than a mouthpiece for LNG developers, and their viscious attacks on local citizens and environmental groups for asking tough questions about LNG were shameful. Check out their archives on LNG related articles from 2010 to see this unvarnished bias. Of course, their basic 'pro-LNG at all costs' position pretty much mirrors the Oregonian editorial board's stance on LNG, so maybe it makes sense....