The way Richard Felley sees it, his son has already paid the price for his crimes.
Felley, who lives in
Nehalem, wrote the Oregon attorney general this spring to complain about
a website, pdxmugshots.com, that featured a mug shot of his 21-year-old
son. Felley had found out the site was demanding $29 to remove his
son’s booking photo. “Doesn’t seem fair that we should have to continue
paying,” he wrote.
Felley today says he
never paid it, nor did his son, who he says has a mental disability.
Court records show his son also has misdemeanor theft and menacing
convictions.
“I’d say they’re predatory in the way they operate,” Felley says of the website, pdxmugshots.com. “It preys on troubled people.”
The
site posts thousands of booking photos from Portland, Salem, Eugene,
Corvallis and other Oregon cities and now charges the accused $39 to
have the photos removed and their names attached to the pictures
scrubbed from Google searches.
The
company operates in other states, including Idaho and Tennessee. Other
companies’ mug-shot sites have popped up in such places as Florida and Utah.
.jpg)
LOCAL FLAVOR: Whatever part of the country you reside in, there's likely a mugshot site available for it.
Mug shots as entertainment has been flourishing. Anyone who has visited a Plaid Pantry lately might have seen copies of Busted,
a $1 tabloid that reprints local booking photos. Other businesses, such
as removearrest.com, promise to purge embarrassing information about
you from the Web.
But pdxmugshots.com is one of the few that both showcase the photos and offer to remove them for a fee.
Fairly simple
mechanics power pdxmugshots: An algorithm scrapes the photos from law
enforcement websites, including the Multnomah County Sheriff’s Office,
which oversees the jail. “It’s definitely not something the sheriff’s
office would condone,” spokesman Lt. Steve Alexander says.
Even advocates of
open government say such sites are in effect extorting people hoping to
avoid further embarrassment. “It seems to me that any effort to profit
from someone else’s personal embarrassment is fundamentally wrong,” says
Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy of the
Federation of American Scientists, a nonprofit group that advocates for
increased transparency. “It is disrespectful. It is exploitative. It is
unethical.”
One of the site’s operators, who identifies himself as Alfonso Petal, says he’s providing a public service.
“Look, we are not
embarrassing anybody,” Petal says. “We are giving public information out
so people can see it in an easy way, so they can see whether their
neighbor or their friend has been arrested.”
His partner, who
identifies himself only as “Barry,” gave a Dec. 8, 2010, interview on
KBOO. He told the radio station that the website didn’t start charging
until he and his business partner were inundated with requests from
people whose mug shots appeared on the site to take them down. “I
realized its revenue potential,” he said.
He also attempted to
explain the appeal of the site: “That whole kind of twisted psychology
where people like to see their friends and neighbors in kind of a
vulnerable position...people can do it privately. You don’t have to feel
too bad about it.”
Petal and his partner have operated in the shadows to avoid being identified. WW tracked the address of the site’s parent company, KA Marketing, to
Anand “Lucky” Jesrani, a Redding, Calif., attorney who filed the corporation's original paperwork. Jesrani says he is only KA Marketing's registered agent and has no connection with the company or the site. He contacted the owners on WW's behalf, and Petal called.
Petal claims the
group doesn’t make much money from the site. “I think me and Barry
probably made $50 each after everything was done last month,” he says.
But crunching numbers he provided suggests the group made about $1,500 a
month in profit from mug shot removal alone. Even advertisers on the
site have had some misgivings.
“My initial thought
was that it’s kind of nefarious,” says Matt Stickler, whose site,
Arrestly.com, alerts employers or other subscribers if people on a watch
list get arrested. “But after talking to them about what they are
actually doing, it’s going to be that or it’s going to be something
else. People are going to monetize emotion, maybe humiliation.”
UPDATE: pdxmugshots.com appears to have stopped charging people for removal of their mugshots—for now.
UPDATE II: The website operator has identified himself as Kyle Ritter, who also runs pdxbars.com
2010 Bojack called and wants his story bak: http://bojack.org/2010/05/scary_yet_irresistible.html
I say round 'em up -- any good lawyer out there would be able to get all of these people on board for a couple of class action suits!!! Bring all the people in the photos to the COURTS!!! MAKE THEM TRY THE CASE! It's already won someplace out west... all they need is a real-life COWBOY! ROUND 'EM UP AND TAKE BACK JUSTICE! PS -- none of the people in these photos were even CONVICTED! They are just BOOKING photos! Take it to the COOOOOUUUURTTTTSSSSSS!
I'm very glad WW did this article. The fact that the scumbags behind these sites themselves use phoney names is very telling. And it's also very telling (and typical) that such mugshot sites are pervasive in fucked-up, mostly CONservative states like Utah, FL, Tenn, Idaho, etc. Why this shit is allowed in Oregon is the real question.
However, One thing that wasn't explained in this article was exactly HOW it is that such sites are even LEGAL to begin with. Collecting mugshots/personal info., placing them on some gawker-esque web-site, and charging people money to remove them - this is soo obviously, nakedly EXTORTION! So someone please tell me how this is not totally illegal. Also, there was no mention of such sites, as well as "Busted" mag. facing numerous lawsuits. How is that not so???
GREAT points "DamosA." Thank you for making them!
Thank you for writing this article! “Look, we are not embarrassing anybody,” Petal says. “We are giving public information out so people can see it in an easy way, so they can see whether their neighbor or their friend has been arrested.” BULLSHIT! Their articles are sick, disgusting, and are a violation of people's rights. It is blackmail pure and simple, and it is WRONG. I hope these sites get shut down.
So far as these sites getting shut down, perhaps Anonymous can get right on it.
to Paul,
Clearly, you're too busy engaging in ad-hominem attacks to recognise two main things:
1. The sites who post these photos are clearly practicing extortion when they charge people money to take them down.
2. Many of these mug shots are of people whom haven't even been CHARGED with a crime, much less convicted.